21
Suggestions & Concerns / EJ's posts in "Transgenderism"
« on: May 24, 2014, 06:47:59 PM »
Why the flip was my post deleted?!! Can someone plese flippin explain thus to mez?!! #stupititey
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
How do you explain the measured distances between places fitting in with a flat earth? eg. Falklands to Australia.As ive said the distences are not entirley acurete and it is my intrist to fix them
I am not a mormonWell then you are an blaspimer an idolter and an IDIOT!!!
I LOVE AFRICAN-AMERICENSAs do i as an African American!!!
I love African-Americen lovers!Why thank you ! I love you to!
Rigecting the Trinitey is rigecting God!!! And deniel of Jesus as God is the deniel of Jesus altogether!!!!!Morminism is nothing but a flippin evil santanic cult. They are NOT Christans!! They dont beleive that Jesus is God thus they are absibituteley NOT Christans
From: http://mormon.org/faq/belief-in-jesus-christQuoteJesus Christ is the literal Son of God. His birth, life, death, and resurrection fulfilled the many prophecies contained in the scriptures concerning the coming of a Savior. He was the Creator, He is our Savior, and He will be our Judge (see Isaiah 9:6, 53:3-7; Psalms 22:16-18).
Under the direction of our Heavenly Father, Jesus Christ created the earth (John 1:10; Hebrews 1:2).
So they dont believe in the trinity, big deal.
Rama, pls.What?
Sounds like a more literal God than in other sects to me.Da flip now?!!
Why??! Im not saying he isent an rascist (wich he is) but pda flip whyz???!!!!!Rama, pls.
Reported for racism.
On another topic, is anyone here any kind of Latter-day Saint (Utah variety or otherwise)? Has anyone read The Book of Mormon? What do you think of it? I've read it. I'm doing some work on it. Any thoughts? Anyone who doesn't know about it, let me know, & I can give a brief synopsis.Morminism is nothing but a flippin evil santanic cult. They are NOT Christans!! They dont beleive that Jesus is God thus they are absibituteley NOT Christans
How is this a flippin "completeley nobsensicel" thred? The olimpics are an event relavint to the internationel comunitey and that it would make an intresting discusion. Thats why I put it in PR&S but I can understand why it got put in A&E but if would be yet another travistey if sent to CN...AGAIN. So look markjo if you have nothing nice or good to say or nothing to add to the discusion plese just lurk somewere elseThen stop making Completely Nonsensical threads.inb4CNSaddam plese I reley dont want another thred to be moved to CN again
Inded they were Much beter than the opining onesThe Olympics are complete. Good games everyone.I heard that the closing ceremonies were nice.
I liked the feel of the games this season.I as well!!!
The Paralympics begin soon.Reley? Show us video plese!
Fun fact, I was actually visible on TV during the opening ceremonies of the Vancouver Paralympics.
inb4CNSaddam plese I reley dont want another thred to be moved to CN again
I saw someone fall over while ice skating. That was amusing.What the hell is wrong with you?
The Olympics are complete. Good games everyone.There still going on you know. Anyone know the flippin standings for yeezjeez sake?!!
Good thread everyonePlese keep low content posting out of the proper fora! Thank You!!!!!
Ok. Let me ask another question. How do FEers explain the movement of stars? For example, Columbus could tell approximate clock time from the Guards of the North Star. The Little Bear or Little Dipper swings around Polaris once every 24 hours sidereal time. Star movement w/ a round, moving Earth I get, but w/ a flat, stationary one?Well round earthism teches that the galaxey has a galatic center wich me agres with. However I do not beleive that some mithicel black hole is in the center I beleive the earth is. Thus all the soler sistims of the galaxey revolve above the earth
If the earth isn't moving, then obviously the stars are.Yep. Yeah pretey much!!!
Well, if you can come up w/ a map that solves the problem, I'd love to see it, seriously. Incidentally, what is your theory about how planes circle the Earth @ the equator?Again gravitey at the poles cause the planes to travel in a circuler direction and give the ilusion that the earth is round by causing them to travel circuleraley round the equater. Think about how (in my neo tichonien model at lest) the sun and moon orbit above the earth VARY VARY SLITLEY elipticley thus: we travel in a circuler "orbit" when walking on the earth
Ok, EJ. Your idea sounds rather interesting. Now, I have a map of a Bipolar Earth on my computer. & the one weakness I see with it is that you can't circumnavigate the world @ the Equator. But in real life, a plane can. How does your theory account for this?The map isent totaley corec and needs some workin out. But ether way gravitey keeps you in the circuler direction that fools people into thinking the earth is round. But again the map stil needs some workin out and I wish to do so on my own time its kinda like how mercater maps are technicley wrong
& on another note, what goes on down in AR stays in AR, ok? Up here, lets just talk about FET. Fair enough?Agred. Thats exacley what I had in mind and we should stay fathful to it
Ok. Here's where I get lost. FEer's can't seem to unify on WHAT the Earth is. Is it unipolar or bipolar? Is it a disc or square? Is it an infinite plane? What is Antarctica? What is (& is there) the ice wall? What happens to ships @ the edge? Is their a firmament? Can an experienced FE theorist take on these questions & present a unified, coherant worldview? I'm not trying to be a dick. I'm genuinely curious.Well this is actueley one of the (suprising) strongist wekneses of our societey. There is a generel thoery as stated in the FAQs that the earth is monopole circuler finite and that antartica is an ice wall of wich I disagre with all four. I think FES may have been ment to just showcase one thoery but as it grew many difrient thoerys have arisin do the fact that the FAQs has a handful of pathetic faliceys. I myself beleive that the earth is bipoler, a disc within a sqware, infinite, and that the antartica is a continint. Most of my thoery is based of scientific evidance some of it is based of religous beleifs. We all have our own thoerys basicley mine causing controversey sometimes! If you have any other questions wether it be about the OP or my thoery plese do ask!!
Wow! Couldent have explaned it beter myself Tintagel! Beutiful!Ok. Here's where I get lost. FEer's can't seem to unify on WHAT the Earth is. Is it unipolar or bipolar? Is it a disc or square? Is it an infinite plane? What is Antarctica? What is (& is there) the ice wall? What happens to ships @ the edge? Is their a firmament? Can an experienced FE theorist take on these questions & present a unified, coherant worldview? I'm not trying to ae a dick. I'm genuinely curious.
I'll go first.
- Unipolar, meaning that the south pole surrounds us. Magnetic substances align with our north pole, and those magnetic field lines extend out beyond the known earth. On the bipolar map, compasses and navigation don't make sense, to me.
- A disc. Everything in the cosmos moves in circles, navigation on the earth (round or flat) happens in circles. The earth is a disc, this is certain.
- It is generally accepted that Antarctica exists. The disc extends past Antarctica for an unknown expanse. This territory is dark, cold, inhospitable, may not even support life, and remains unexplored. It may be infinite. No edge has ever been seen.
- Antarctica is the mass of land that has been theorized to be a continent covering the southern polar region on a globe. On the monopole earth it the mass of land that surrounds the inhabited continents we call the earth. Its total area is unknown and it remains unexplored. Necessarily, it holds the oceans in.
- The Ice Wall is just a fancy name for Antarctica. Some claim there is a literal wall of ice that sits on the antarctic land mass - I wouldn't be surprised if there are several, in fact. It's cold. Be that as it may, the Ice Wall as a whole is essentially just Antarctica.
- As the edge (if it exists) is out of reach of the sun, it is unlikely that a ship would ever sail there, as the oceans would be frozen.
- There is no evidence for a physical firmament. Some (like Thork) do like the idea of a firmament but I've never seen anything that would indicate its existence.
There are a lot of unknowns. Zetetic Astronomy is a science of observation. Unless I've observed / experienced a phenomenon for myself, I cannot say unequivocally that the phenomenon exists. This is why our ideas about the expanse of the earth beyond the Antarctic get a little murky.
Ok. Tintagel, that is interesting. @ least that is a start. Anyone else?You should definateley listen to what tintagel just posted. Tis a vary thorough and detaled explanation!!!!!!
I think the problem is you think of it as a single theory.Exacley. Evereyones thoerys seem to be difrint one way or another
It's more like flat earth theories.
They don't all agree.
Try meAgred. It is a fantastic pece of litratur a must reed! How can you posibley deny dr. Rowbothoms argumints?Quite easily, for the most part.
Show me your proof, and I will argue for the sake of arguing.Water. When you poor water into a cup the surfice is flat. Even wen the botom is curved upwerd or downwerd the surfice is still flat. There is a fanominon caled "meniscus" in wich the top surfice of water apers to curve in a gradruated silindar but this is simpeley caused by molcules in the glas. So were is the glas in the ocens? You cant have a round earth because the water in the ocens should be flat acording to this truth. The top surfice of water naturaley stays flat so therfore it is imposibel that a round earth can exist. There you have it
Read Earth Not a Globe by Samuel Rowbotham.Agred. It is a fantastic pece of litratur a must reed! How can you posibley deny dr. Rowbothoms argumints?
What a lazy OP.
I herd u lyk macklemoreWel...DUH!!!
Doesn't really matter who wins what, most of the artists in competition for these awards will be washed up by the end of the decade anyway.Shut up no they flippin wont mackelmore is the GRETEST RAPER OF ALL TIME!!!!!! You probz couldent rap as fast as him!!!!!!!!!
Exacley I have much disdan for israel they STOL the lands from the palastinens!!!So they can accuse you of being racist when you question their despicable actions. See Israel.In the Heaven thread, someone actually suggested this. If anyone has any questions about Jews & Judaism, I'll try to answer. I'm neither the most brilliant nor the most foolish Jew in the world. I like to think I'm reasonably well informed. If I can't answer your question, I'll tell you that too. So, fire ahead. If nobody does, that won't offend me either. This is just an offer.Yeah I have a question: why the flip do jewish people act like jewish is a race when it is a religion?
1/32 is ignored. Everybody else, please continue.Yakoov (hear ill call you "Jewish is a race " for now on ) if your going to make a thred were we can ask jewish dude a question you gota be able to anser everey question. Looks pretey bad on your part and I think/know evereyone here can agre with me
Seeing what Thork said, I'll respond to that. Jews are not, and never have been, a race, nor do we pretend to be. We are an ethnic group, which is quite different. A Jew shares DNA with another Jew that he does not share with you. A Levite shares DNA with another Levite that he does not even share with other Jews. A Cohen shares even closer DNA with another Cohen that he does not share with Levites or other Jews, although Cohens are Levites and both of them are Jews. I shan't go on at length because I've discussed this matter to the point of wanting to vomit in other threads, on both Flat Earth websites. As far as doing things with which a person might disagree, anyone can disagree with a given action of the State of Israel without being anti-Semitic. But when one expects Israel to act differently than other nations might act when faced with similar circumstances, that IS anti-Semitic, and needs to be called out.Thats onley becuz jewish has a supa crazey rule were you can onley marey felow jewish people. (rascism much?) and thats why there so geneticeley in comon. Its stil a religon. Its like how cathlics can onley marey cathliks. Idiot
So, that having been said, I think I've responded to Thork reasonably well. Responding to 1/32 isn't necessary. He is ignored. The rest of you, please continue. I won't respond to 1/32 unless one of you does, like Thork did. Otherwise, he will be ignored.
It's not anti-Semitic since, by definition Arabs are a Semitic people as well. But please keep on trying to appropriate it. It would be difficult for other nations to be in the position that Israel believes itself to be since there can be only one land of milk and honey right?Jewish is a Semitic religon not a Semitic people
If you prefer, I shall use the term "anti-Jewish". We did not not invent the term "anti-Semite". That was a German in the late 19th Century who hated Jews. He called himself an anti-Semite. It wasn't Hitler, who was Austrian. I forget the dude's name, actually. I could probably find it, but I don't care to. You're right. Arabs are Semites, and there are a few more people that are as well, or at least that use Semitic languages (some various folk in Ethiopia).What?!! Etheopeins are AFRICAN AMERICANS not semitic!!!
In the Heaven thread, someone actually suggested this. If anyone has any questions about Jews & Judaism, I'll try to answer. I'm neither the most brilliant nor the most foolish Jew in the world. I like to think I'm reasonably well informed. If I can't answer your question, I'll tell you that too. So, fire ahead. If nobody does, that won't offend me either. This is just an offer.Yeah I have a question: why the flip do jewish people act like jewish is a race when it is a religion?
I should be curious to know who did the study that purports to prove that the religious outlive the non-religious. Has it been peer-reviewed? How was it validated? I'm a religious man, but just taking some blind statistic that someone pulled out of their heiny is playing awfully loose w/ facts. What about atheists w/ a strong network of friends & supporters analogous to a faith community, v. a Jew living in the Deep South 100 miles from another Jew? & every half-educated dimwit knows we didn't evolve from monkeys. We are a Primate, like them. Well, maybe EJ DID evolve from them, but the rest of us didn't, & Darwin never said we did.Are you honesley saying you beleived we evolved from flippin monkees?!! That is papostros??!