Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
There is no argument with your non-sequitur point.
The rackets I listed are cons foisted upon the public and committed by criminals within all levels of government.
Now, as I wrote earlier, go sit in the corner and leave the humans in peace.
Choose one of the following:
A - In order to conduct a racket (in the context of a criminal operation), it requires the confidence of all parties affected by its operation.
B - In order to conduct a racket (in the context of a criminal operation), it requires the act of conniving amongst the operators of the racket.
CASE CLOSED!
Now please, just go sit in the corner somewhere and leave the actual humans alone.
Sorry, I am correct, you are wrong.
I won't waste my time with entities such as you anymore.
I choose to grow out of the practice of wasting my time with the ilk who are labeling forum participants as "dipshits," when they have lost an argument.
FE WINS!!!
Q - How do persons running a protection racket evade prosecution and detection from law enforcement?Con stands for confidence, dipshit, not conniving. As in you gain someone's CONfidence to exploit them.
A - CONniving to do so.
Please try again.
Describe a racket that does not involve some sort of conniving approach.Protection.
Then, I will cede the point.
War is certainly a con, human trafficking is certainly a con, and the Burisma deal was certainly a con.You are biased. Thus your writing is biased.
You are free to disagree, but any non-biased reader clearly understands I am correct in my analysis.
Any non-biased reader clearly understands Joe Biden to be a demented old pedo, who thankfully, is close to the end of his criminal career and, hopefully, life.
My point is cons are rackets and the things I listed are certainly "rackets." Therefore, they are cons.
Cons are a "racket."And not all Rackets are cons.
The war in Ukraine, human trafficking, and the practice of being a NAZI, all constitute the highest type level of rackets.
Ukraine has been (and continues to be) a focal point for human trafficking and bioweaponry research, in addition to a "NAZI" safe space.
Right along with the US, by the way, who provided immediate relocation to the US of many top NAZI's after WWII.
None of these things constitute "cons,", amirite?
Not at all.Wait wait wait..
I abhor cons like Trump University and others, like the war in Ukraine.
How about you?
You love the con being pulled in Ukraine, don'tcha!?!?
As I wrote earlier, that conviction will get overturned on appeal.Why?
Do you have any insight as to whether the Virgin Islands or Guam desire to remain a US protectorate or wish to leave?Do you?
I am going to take a wild guess and write: "No, you don't."
The US certainly has a Day of Independence and Greenland (just like the Virgin Islands and Guam) can join that group in celebrating.
The Greenland PM recently announced that Greenland wishes to go independent. Now yesterday Greenland issued a press release on Trump's recent comments stating that they are struggling for independence and would be happy to work with the Trump and his administration.
It's not looking good for the narrative that Greenland wants nothing to do with Trump. The likelihood is high that if Greenland goes independent that they will voluntarily become a US protectorate.Quote from: GreenlandGreenland's independence
Greenland belongs to the Greenlanders – and the development and future of Greenland will only be determined by the Greenlanders. The struggle for independence is the responsibility of the Greenlanders. We must decide and shape our own future. We know our rights as independent people.
International cooperation
States and countries are welcome to express interest in further cooperation with Greenland. We are open to closer and more ambitious cooperation with our neighboring countries in the pursuit of Greenland's independence. Greenland looks forward to discussions with the United States on economic cooperation, in the field of mining in Greenland, and on other opportunities related to the development of the country's important mineral resources and sectors.
The Trump administration
will work with Greenland today, today and in the future as one of the United States' closest partners. Greenland has had a defense cooperation with the United States for more than 80 years, and the cooperation has benefited both countries and their borders. The Cabinet is looking forward to building relations with President-elect Donald Trump and his administration.
Political developments in the field of fisheries in the Arctic
Greenland is aware of the change in the political position in the field of fisheries in the Arctic. We understand and accept that Greenland is a decisive and important country in the US security interests. This is the reason why the Americans have an important military base in northern Greenland. Greenland looks forward to cooperating with the US government and NATO allies to ensure security and stability in the Arctic.
If opposition to faulty reasoning = hate in your world-view, then why the question? I am not going to engage in some dialogue with an entity holding this approach."This has never happened from a democratic president so it's likely not going to happen now" isn't faulty reasoning.
Given everything you and I have witnessed over the last 8 years (and disagreed about, sometimes vehemently), I can only reiterate my extreme opposition to the type of reasoning necessary in forming the wording of your question.So you're jaded and hate everything.