1

Flat Earth Community / Another Neil deGrasse Tyson and NASA Booboo

« on: August 06, 2015, 03:13:56 AM »

A friend of mine sent me a video by Neil deGrasse Tyson.
It's quite nice, as far as production goes... but then... just like in so many of their other videos,
the booboo happens.


Check out at 2:44 into the film - you'll see it.
There is the international space station filming footage from space, outside the atmosphere of the Earth. Ok. It's fake, for sure, but what proves that the video is fake, or that they are actually revealing something about the earth being flat?
The fact that the stars are rotating around the North Star even while the perspective is NOT on the Earth while it is rotating.

You see, we flat earthers believe that the earth is flat and does not rotate. Instead, the stars in the firmament rotate around Polaris (North Star).

But here, in this video, we see that even while the space station is OFF the planet, so one is not benefiting from the Earth's "rotation" to see the fixed stars "move" in the sky around us while we rotate (globe earth jargon), we can still see the stars in full rotation. So this video is of course faked.

I saw in the credits that this was from a video called - Earth -Time Lapse View from Space/Fly Over -Nasa, ISS
which has the same booboo all over the video - it shows a "satellite" (clearly fake) outside of the earth's atmosphere with the stars circumpolarly rotating in the sky.


(in particular at 1:49 and again at 3:30 - you can see the circumpolar rotation of the stars which makes no sense from a Globe earth theory perspective.)

Folks, according to "round earth theory" the stars are fixed. they don't move.
The only reason they move is due to being on a rotating earth.
So why are they moving in the background in a circumpolar fashion in these NASA "international space station" videos?

Try to explain THAT away with Round Earth theory.

So if this is footage from the international space station in space above the planet (say, 100,000-150,000 feet), it's moving along the flat earth and the roundness is faked with a fish eye effect, all the while the stars rotate in the firmament around the North Star. or the whole damned thing is faked. Or, the whole thing is faked and they took footage of stars rotating around the North Star and pasted it into the video of the "round earth" not realizing how dumb that is.

Another fake NASA video.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Flat Earth Diameter? no round earthers need answer thanks

« on: August 03, 2015, 07:18:50 PM »

hey FE friends,

What is the diameter of the flat earth from antarctic ridge to antarctic ridge?

And how has this been determined?

thanks Globe Earthers for keeping clear of this one.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Jupiter - rotation?

« on: July 31, 2015, 09:15:13 PM »

Hi friends,

I had the privilege last fall of looking at Jupiter and its moons (along with other stars and planets) in a high powered telescope.  I was a Globe Earther at the time, ignorant of any wondrous happenings of Flat Earthers. Recently, I've become convinced of Flat Earth. I have no doubt about it. None of the globe earth arguments stick with me at all.

I do have a question regarding Jupiter's rotation as a means of potentially verifying some present "scientific" bullshit info.
According to: http://www.universetoday.com/23914/rotation-of-jupiter/
Jupiter  has the fastest rotation of any of the planets. It takes 9.9 hours to make one full rotation.

Ok, so this is what I wasn't even thinking of looking for when I gazed through the telescope.
I could see the red Storm eye of Jupiter, and I must have been looking at it for around 15 minutes.
Here's my question -
A full rotation of the huge planet in 10 hours would make it easy to look for surface rotation in the telescope.
One could look for the red storm eye of Jupiter, mark the time and the position of the storm eye, and then wait
1.25 hours and expect to see 45 degrees of rotation, or in 2.5 hours, one could see 90 degrees of rotation of Jupiter.

However, when one sees images of Jupiter, one most often (almost always) sees the red storm eye of Jupiter front facing toward the camera. So, this could be because the photographers are so storm-of-Jupiter happy that they couldn't fathom NOT taking a picture of Jupiter with the storm front facing, or...
Jupiter is, in fact, NOT rotating at all.

So, has anyone every witnessed Jupiter's storm movement over time? It wouldn't take long to verify a 45 degree change (only takes 1.25 hours) and 2.5 hours to see a 90 degree change from the "9.9 rotation."

I've asked my friends with the telescope to check this problem out, but they won't be home for 1.5 months and I can't wait to hear an answer to this.