# The Flat Earth Society

## Flat Earth Discussion Boards => Flat Earth Projects => Topic started by: 9 out of 10 doctors agree on February 05, 2019, 08:13:35 PM

Title: Better explanation for FAQ on UA/speed of light
Post by: 9 out of 10 doctors agree on February 05, 2019, 08:13:35 PM
The FAQ in the wiki has the following reasoning for why the Earth will not exceed the speed of light:

Quote
Due to special relativity, this is not the case. At this point, many readers will question the validity of any answer which uses advanced, intimidating-sounding physics terms to explain a position. However, it is true. The relevant equation is v/c = tanh (at/c). One will find that in this equation, tanh(at/c) can never exceed or equal 1. This means that velocity can never reach the speed of light, regardless of how long one accelerates for and the rate of the acceleration.

While the science used here is correct, it seems like someone reading it would still have trouble grasping the argument, or why it works this way. So I wonder if we could change it to something more like this:

Quote
Unfortunately, that's only half of the truth. You're probably thinking of an object that accelerates at a constant rate, then abruptly stops accelerating when it reaches the speed of light. The problem with this idea is that it violates relativity. The real reason that we say that the speed of light can't be exceeded comes from the Lorentz factor, calculated as (1-v2/c2)-1/2. This factor is used in special relativity for many different purposes, but most notably for time dilation. Essentially, while a moving object feels the same force regardless of speed due to the principle of relativity, the rest frame will see it accelerate progressively less and less according to the Lorentz factor. Since it approaches infinity as the object approaches the speed of light, that speed is never exceeded to the rest frame.
Title: Re: Better explanation for FAQ on UA/speed of light
Post by: Pete Svarrior on February 08, 2019, 10:44:02 AM
The explanation could certainly do with improving, and I think your suggestion is a step in the right direction. Though I'm not sure if saying that a body "feels" a force is the best choice of words. "Perceives", maybe?
Title: Re: Better explanation for FAQ on UA/speed of light
Post by: WellRoundedIndividual on February 08, 2019, 10:52:33 AM
How about "the force acting upon a moving object remains constant regardless" or resultant force or the like? (Omg, the wrong team is helping you...oh no...)