The FAQ is the very first message: it is absolutely accesible to every reader, and it does answer the questions that the official faq cannot.
It is not the first message.
Also, what you wrote answers nothing. I'm sorry but if I can't understans the answers without first understanding how subquarks flow inside the aether (and what aether is) then its not a faq. (Frequently Asked Questions). What it is, is a book.
The readers of the FEFAQ want to be challenged, to go beyond what the official science has to say.
Or they want answers to frequently asked questions.
My explanations are pretty clear: please read the bibliographical material, explained by the best scientists in the world (for example, Dr. Stephen Phillips of UCLA).
No, they really aren't. You didn't define a quark or a boson. I know they're subparticles that make up quantum physics but most will not.
I have even put at your disposal PHOTOGRAPHS of magnets with subquark flow.
How do you photograph a subquark when they are, by definition, smaller than light waves? Smaller than electrons? If you're talking about the picture, thats a single subquark string, so not a magnet with subquark flow.
Finally, you don't seem to understand what is going on here.
Other than my FAQ, the reader will not able to get the answers he/she wants re: FET.
Not from the official faq anyway.
I haven't gotten any answer I understand yet. Do you think a new person will do better? I at least know you and am familiar with your work.
Simplify.