Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Lord Dave

Pages: < Back  1 ... 246 247 [248] 249 250 ... 315  Next >
4941
Wait... You said your readers love your proofs and hate the faq. 
Then you say your only supporter is yourself?  By mere fact that you dismiss evidence that isn't your own?

4942
The FAQ is just the very first message, not the debate which ensued afterwards: I am telling you how things are, you seem to  want to be making up the rules on this thread, which is kind of rude, don't you think?

You haven't paid your dues here or anywhere else to be able to tell me what to do.

I have given the best references which do answer your questions (most of them are linked to this very site).

The other references do include the very definition of a quark, subquark, and a Higgs boson for that matter: obviously, as usual, your homework was done superficially, that is why you have no right to complain.


The photographs refer to subquark flow, that is, the magnetic field (Spintronics published these amazing images for the very first time).


Now, do not pretend that you do not understand the answers I have been providing to you.

What I was expecting from you, is to take your time, in fact several days, to go through the ample references I provided: here you are, 15 minutes later with a bizarre request, "simplify".

You were able to understand them when we were debating the DePalma experiment some years ago, no complaints from you then.


Trust my judgment: I know that most of my readers DO understand what I'm saying, and are very dissatisfied with the other faq.

The official faq answers NOTHING at all pertaining to gravity, radio waves and much more: if YOU are satisfied with this state of affairs, most other RE are not.

One of the RE asked a very simple question: how do you explain the ham radio distance to the moon measurements? No other FE was able to answer (nor will they using the official faq). But I was.

My FAQ does answer the important questions, no matter what you say: it has been used for the past  eight years to defeat each and everyone of the best RE (perhaps they understood it much better than you can).

If I need days to understand an answer, then it really shouldn't be in an faq.

As for paying my dues, not sure which ones those are.  Activity?  Upper forum activity?  FET promotion?

Finally: ok.  Your readers trust your judgement.  Fine.

Let them speak your praise here.  In fact, if they do, its likely you'll win the vote and have your faq put up.

As for if I'm satisfied with the current faq: yes.

4943
The FAQ is the very first message: it is absolutely accesible to every reader, and it does answer the questions that the official faq cannot.
It is not the first message.
Also, what you wrote answers nothing.  I'm sorry but if I can't understans the answers without first understanding how subquarks flow inside the aether (and what aether is) then its not a faq.  (Frequently Asked Questions). What it is, is a book.


Quote
The readers of the FEFAQ want to be challenged, to go beyond what the official science has to say.
Or they want answers to frequently asked questions.

Quote
My explanations are pretty clear: please read the bibliographical material, explained by the best scientists in the world (for example, Dr. Stephen Phillips of UCLA).
No, they really aren't.  You didn't define a quark or a boson.  I know they're subparticles that make up quantum physics but most will not.

Quote
I have even put at your disposal PHOTOGRAPHS of magnets with subquark flow.
How do you photograph a subquark when they are, by definition, smaller than light waves?  Smaller than electrons?  If you're talking about the picture, thats a single subquark string, so not a magnet with subquark flow.


Quote
Finally, you don't seem to understand what is going on here.

Other than my FAQ, the reader will not able to get the answers he/she wants re: FET.

Not from the official faq anyway.
I haven't gotten any answer I understand yet.  Do you think a new person will do better?  I at least know you and am familiar with your work.

Simplify.

4944
And this is why your FAQ is terrible.  It requires a degree in levee to understand anything you say.

4945
Since subquarks are smaller than quarks which are smaller than electrons which are smaller than atoms..


How does so many align spontaneously?  And why?

Also, what about electrons?

And your "diality paradox solution" is a paradox.  A boson is a particle.  A subquark is... God knows what.  Neither is a wave.  And if they are, a wave of what?  Energy?

Also, what about "what is a conductor"?

And if bosons are one wave and subquark strings are the other, how do they impart momentum energy when passing through matter?  (Bosons and subquarks are both smaller than matter thus can't impact it.)

4946
I read the FAQ you posted and I am very confused.

Like if monopole magnets are subquaks, then wouldn't a string of monopole magnets be a string of subquarks?

Also, if boson's flow through subquark strings to make electricity and magatism, how can subquark strings exist if Aether = medium through which the subquarks strings (ether) flow when Aether is only above the atmosphere as the dome?

Finally, if bosons flow outside a conductor to make magetism, then what about a permanent bar magnet?  The bosons should be flowing inside the conductive metal, out into the non-conductive air, then around and back into the conductive metal.  But no electricity flows in the metal.

Also, we see lighting.  Does that mean Air is a conductor?  What about rocks?  Wood?  Plastic?  People?
What is a conductor?

4947
Suggestions & Concerns / Re: Changes to the FAQ
« on: January 26, 2016, 09:46:38 AM »
245,000 views and no one still believes in your model.

Doesn't that make you pause and ask why?

4948
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: January 25, 2016, 12:14:41 PM »
Well, it looks like it is going to be Trump.

Trump will win Republican Idol because he has experience in reality TV competitions. And that is exactly what this presidential cycle will be like. Politicians used to have debates run by the groups such as women's lib who would ask questions of the candidates based on their area of interest. The candidates would get a 60 min opening speech, receive follow up questions and then provide a 30 min rebuttal.

Now they go on NBC or Fox debates. They have 60 seconds to talk about the economy for example, get a question back and give a 30 second rebuttal.

This plays to Trump. He's going to slaughter any other Republican.


Now Trump is also going to win the whitehouse. Janet Yellen has seen to that. By November the economy in America is going to be in meltdown with a crashed stock market, bail outs for banks, major corps, huge amounts of debt etc. Yellen pricked the bubble. And no democrat will stand a chance because they are going to be blamed for the financial turmoil as it has happened on Obama's watch and he kept telling everyone he saved the economy ... which he didn't, he kicked the can down the road.


So Trump it is. Enjoy America, enjoy.
The GOP will block him at the caucus.

4949
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Star Wars ep 7 (with spoilers)
« on: January 25, 2016, 12:23:23 AM »
Rey is a butch lesbo

So her and plasma will have a love story?

4950
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Star Wars ep 7 (with spoilers)
« on: January 22, 2016, 07:04:26 AM »
She kissed his forehead.  It was affectionate, but not necessarily romantic.

Star Wars VIII: The Friend Zone

4951
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Star Wars ep 7 (with spoilers)
« on: January 21, 2016, 01:09:55 PM »
Star Wars VIII is now delayed until December 2017. :(

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-35368146

The opening crawl for Episode VIII

"Two years after the destruction of Star Killer Base..."

4952
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Star Wars ep 7 (with spoilers)
« on: January 20, 2016, 01:34:59 AM »
Star Wars has always had a very skewed sense of distances. Realistically the starkiller base shots should take years to even find a target. But then again, ships can move between systems in hours at "light speed"...

I guess it's just one of those things you're not supposed to think about too much.

They explained that.  It traveled via hyperspace.

4953
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: January 18, 2016, 11:55:33 AM »
I read an article on npr last week about cruz and the evengelion vote.

What's his stance on the Rebuilds?

No idea what you mean.
Just a guess: he couldn't figure out what you meant by "evengelion" (I sure know I can't), so he pretended you said "Evangelion".

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rebuild_of_Evangelion

Ah.  Once again my inability to spell has confused all.

Evangelicalism is what I was going for. 

4954
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: 2016 US Presidential Race
« on: January 18, 2016, 06:03:24 AM »
I read an article on npr last week about cruz and the evengelion vote.

What's his stance on the Rebuilds?

No idea what you mean.

4955
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Fallout series
« on: January 16, 2016, 11:03:23 PM »
There isn't a whole lot of information in F4 on what happened to the Capital Wasteland from F3, but some of the dialogue from generic BoS members indicates that in the ten years since the events of that game, the wasteland is now even more chaotic and lawless than ever before, overrun with raiders and SMs, and the BoS has basically lost any real control over the area.  Project Purity, the BoS's war with the Enclave, everything the Lone Wanderer and the other characters of F3 fought so hard to achieve...it was all for nothing.  I'm not sure why Bethesda would do something like this.  I can understand them wanting to go somewhat darker and edgier after F3's whimsical worldbuilding and its epic/heroic/TES-inspired story, but there are better ways to achieve that tone than stomping all over previous games.

It's possible they took all the data from players and what they did, analyzed it, and found that most players just killed anyone they wanted.  Which was also everyone they could.

So they made the history match.

4956
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« on: January 14, 2016, 02:20:50 PM »
And when gold is no longer valuable?

4957
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: ISIS and the Middle East
« on: January 14, 2016, 01:12:24 PM »
Every us presidential cycle.  See the other, smaller dips?

Connect the dots.

4958
Arts & Entertainment / Re: Star Wars ep 7 (with spoilers)
« on: January 13, 2016, 11:30:20 PM »
I think it was convenient that they just happen to blow up every planet in the solar system except for the one Leia was on.

I think she was in a different system.

4959
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The saga of Cliven Bundy
« on: January 12, 2016, 02:59:55 PM »

4960
Arts & Entertainment / David Bowie is dead
« on: January 11, 2016, 07:22:06 AM »

Pages: < Back  1 ... 246 247 [248] 249 250 ... 315  Next >