Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
I know more about the term than you know about proper punctuation.gaslightingIt seems you may not know what that term means,
It is and this does not involve court proceedings.It is hearsay.It's not, and your not being able or willing to understand that, means nothing to the court or the proceedings.
Maybe, but I am sure they would be more capable than you.The topic is abortion, not miscarriage.
Do you think those in the state legislatures can reliably tell the difference? Have they all accounted for it in their lawmaking?
The hearsay is being confirmed by multiple sources within Secret Service, by footage of Trump in the vehicle.Oh, you have seen the footage...BWAHAHA!!!
He could have got out and walked there by himself, couldn't he? Oh, no, I forgot; he can't walk that far, and needs a golf cart to get around.
And like I said earlier, if the facts are in dispute, he can volunteer to testify, under oath, to set the record straight, can't he?
Listen bullwinkle.funny, where are the judges asking the questions in this matter?That is still hearsay.
No, it's not. Try to follow...
Case 1QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X get into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "He said he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection sustained."
Case 2QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X tell you personally that he got into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "Yes, he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection overruled."
There go your reading skills again. No the judges are ruling on the procedure (obviously).It is hearsay.No, It's not.
Hearsay is when a witness relates a conversation with another person who is outside the court (not there, not called, otherwise unavailable) in support of evidence or other matter before the court. Like in case1 above.
I will say something for you, you are consistent.
Hutchinson can say whatever she wants, wherever she wants.That is still hearsay.She testified as to what she heard...aka HEARSAY.Unless that was the evidence she was asked to testify on and that she heard it firsthand.
If she is describing someone's recollection of an event, then it is still admissible.Rule 803. Hearsay Exceptions; Availability of Declarant Immaterial
The following are not excluded by the hearsay rule, even though the declarant is available as a witness:
(1) Present sense impression. A statement describing or explaining an event or condition made while the declarant was perceiving the event or condition, or immediately thereafter.
It doesn't matter what I believe about your post.Again, the topic is abortion, not conception.And you believe that conception immediately equals personhood?I refer you back to the topic of abortion.
Abortion takes place at a time after conception.
When does a pregnancy start?
The start of pregnancy is actually the first day of your last menstrual period. This is called the gestational age, or menstrual age. It’s about two weeks ahead of when conception actually occurs. Though it may seem strange, the date of the first day of your last period will be an important date when determining your due date. Your healthcare provider will ask you about this date and will use it to figure out how far along you are in your pregnancy.
What happens right after conception?
Within 24 hours after fertilization, the egg begins rapidly dividing into many cells. It remains in the fallopian tube for about three days after conception. Then the fertilized egg (now called a blastocyte) continues to divide as it passes slowly through the fallopian tube to the uterus. Once there, its next job is to attach to the endometrium. This is called implantation.
Within three weeks, the blastocyte cells ultimately form a little ball, or an embryo. By this time, the first nerve cells have formed.
So do you believe a blastocyte is a person and a potential victim if an abortion occurs at this stage, post-conception, pre-embryo?
Correct. And here's a question about abortion, the topic: Do you believe a blastocyte is a person and a potential victim if an abortion occurs at this stage, post-conception, pre-embryo?
I find it interesting you provide a source that fails to support your claim in any way whatsoever.The topic is abortion, not miscarriage.But women are being arrested for miscarriages too.
https://www.11alive.com/article/news/national/miscarriages-are-already-criminalized-roe-v-wade/85-7e78facf-b673-4775-8a09-9a45e3a794b2
funny, where are the judges asking the questions in this matter?That is still hearsay.
No, it's not. Try to follow...
Case 1QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X get into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "He said he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection sustained."
Case 2QuoteLawer1: "Did Mr. X tell you personally that he got into his car the night of the rape?"
Witness: "Yes, he did."
Lawer2: "Objection, hearsay!"
Judge: "Objection overruled."
The topic is abortion, not miscarriage.What happens right after conception?
Within 24 hours after fertilization, the egg begins rapidly dividing into many cells. It remains in the fallopian tube for about three days after conception. Then the fertilized egg (now called a blastocyte) continues to divide as it passes slowly through the fallopian tube to the uterus. Once there, its next job is to attach to the endometrium. This is called implantation.
What about blastocytes that don't implant or otherwise become non-viable due to natural reasons? Is the woman liable the loss of pregnancy for natural reasons if she doesn't even know that she might have been (at least briefly) pregnant?How many human embryos die between fertilisation and birth under natural conditions? It is widely accepted that natural human embryo mortality is high, particularly during the first weeks after fertilisation, with total prenatal losses of 70% and higher frequently claimed.
Again, the topic is abortion, not conception.And you believe that conception immediately equals personhood?I refer you back to the topic of abortion.
Abortion takes place at a time after conception.
When does a pregnancy start?
The start of pregnancy is actually the first day of your last menstrual period. This is called the gestational age, or menstrual age. It’s about two weeks ahead of when conception actually occurs. Though it may seem strange, the date of the first day of your last period will be an important date when determining your due date. Your healthcare provider will ask you about this date and will use it to figure out how far along you are in your pregnancy.
What happens right after conception?
Within 24 hours after fertilization, the egg begins rapidly dividing into many cells. It remains in the fallopian tube for about three days after conception. Then the fertilized egg (now called a blastocyte) continues to divide as it passes slowly through the fallopian tube to the uterus. Once there, its next job is to attach to the endometrium. This is called implantation.
Within three weeks, the blastocyte cells ultimately form a little ball, or an embryo. By this time, the first nerve cells have formed.
So do you believe a blastocyte is a person and a potential victim if an abortion occurs at this stage, post-conception, pre-embryo?
And you believe that conception immediately equals personhood?I refer you back to the topic of abortion.
That is still hearsay.She testified as to what she heard...aka HEARSAY.Unless that was the evidence she was asked to testify on and that she heard it firsthand.
Of course, it isn't true in all cases due to the fact there are people who want to substitute their own reality for actual reality so they can kill a person via abortion without fear of external consequence.The law already defines it.Lazy?https://www.law.cornell.edu/cfr/text/28/94.102This is just so lazy. You're telling me I'm wrong for pasting a literal law that explicitly excludes abortions and pretending like you understand legal terms better than people who write the laws.
Seems a crime victim is a person
You are just flat-out wrong.
So, there you have it.
An unborn fetus is a person.
The source I posted is a legal source, defining what a victim is.
A victim is a person, period, end of sentence.
That means when an abortion happens, a person is killed.
You have to define first whether a fetus is a ‘person’ or not. Then you can make the claim that when an abortion happens, a person is killed. That’s pretty much the crux of the whole issue; is a fetus a person at 6 weeks gestation? 12 weeks? 24 weeks? At conception?
If you murder women who are pregnant, you are guilty of two counts of murder.
Pretty clear cut.
Not really that clear cut:
Some of the state-specific feticide laws considered the fetus to be a person if it is viable, meaning it can survive out of the womb independently.
Some States, the ones you would expect, consider a fetus a "person" at any stage of pregnancy, hence the double homicide. Other States say a fetus is a "person" at viability, not before.
And even some States have no laws on the books regarding this at all.
So no, the blanket statement of "murder women who are pregnant, you are guilty of two counts of murder," is not true in all cases.
She testified as to what she heard...aka HEARSAY.Why are you perpetuating hearsay and a story that has been flatly denied by senior officials with the Secret Service?
Has it been denied by someone under oath? For the lady who delivered this to the J6 committee was under oath. Are you accusing her of perjury?
Yeah, I am positive.Democratic Socialist NAZI's
Are you sure putting those 3 words together makes any kind of sense? I'd throw in fascist and globalist too, just to be extra sure it's utter rubbish.
There's been a lot of news about Trump lately in the ongoing hearings, but the one big story everyone is talking about is Cassidy Hutchinson's testimony. Here's a good article summarizing it:Why are you perpetuating hearsay and a story that has been flatly denied by senior officials with the Secret Service?
https://www.vox.com/2022/6/28/23186748/cassidy-hutchinson-january-6-hearing-committee
True enough. He is always 100% more cordialI consider it cordial to point out obvious crap so others do not step into it.
No, we didn't.If you aren't interested in having an honest conversation, you should just avoid me instead of looking lying to try and make me look bad.He never is. We bypassed homicide being the number one cause of death to pregnant women
and are back on first trimester abortion is murder that apparently matters more than the woman. There's no point.No one stated any murder of any one person matters more than the murder of any other person except for abortion advocates like you.
Not at all. I have remained completely consistent and on target.Imagine using the adjectives "medically necessary," when describing the act of murder.
Yet, here, directly above this post, Rama does exactly just that.
Remarkable.
I see, your attempt to misrepresent what I wrote failed comepletely so now you are pivoting. If you aren't interested in having an honest conversation, you should just avoid me instead of looking lying to try and make me look bad.