You said "Yes" when I asked if you had measured them (see quote above). I'm specifically asking what tests you did, and what your results were, OF THESE TESTS. How is that ignoring what you said? I don't want citations of the existence of such forces, I want to know what YOU did to test them, since you said you had actually done this.
Besides which, isn't posting simply to complain about someone else's style of posting, or lack of response, deemed to be "Low-content posting in the upper fora" or somesuch?
The fact you totally ignored my response is not a problem with your 'style,' it is an problem with your utter lack of logic. What is the point in you asking questions when you don't give a damn about the answers, you just want to waste time and score cheap victories over semantics and non-entities?
I don't particularly feel like digging up my old tests when you already agree that the forces I verified exist. You are blatantly just wasting my time.
If you're talking about a downward force which varies with altitude then yes, we all agree that exists. We being "round earthers". It's called gravity.
But your assertion is that the difference in force increases with altitude to the point that it would break up a rocket to which the response is...no it wouldn't.
That is what you're being asked to show your tests of.
It wouldn't cause rockets to break up because the formula for the force of gravity between two objects is F = G M1 M2 / r2
Where G is the gravitational constant. M1 and M2 are the masses of the two objects and r is the distance between their centres of gravity.
Now, the centre of gravity of the earth is, more or less, in the middle of the earth and the radius of the earth is 6371km.
So while yes, the force is less as you ascend because 'r' increases, it only increases a bit relative to the size of the earth.
Even at 100km above the surface the force would be about 97% of that at the surface - it's a myth that there is no gravity in space, the astronauts in the ISS are weightless because the forces (weight is a force) balance out, they are effectively in perpetual freefall.
So, while yes, there is a downward force and yes that force does vary with altitude the difference in forces between the top and bottom of a rocket at any altitude are not going to noticeable, much less pull the thing apart. If you have tests and measurements which show different then let's see them.
And no, this is not the same force which causes meteors to break up, that's caused by them slamming into the atmosphere. That is also why spacecraft like the space shuttle have to have heat shields to stop them breaking up on re-entry, when the heat shield was damaged it did break up on re-entry