I would not. But Trump clearly did.
So let me get this straight, the trade war, that lowered our trade with China and increased tariffs, you don't like it, it was bad, but also you wouldn't have a problem with it? It seems more and more that your position is "I don't like Trump, he's a big meanie
" and not based on any policy reality.
Don't need nuclear weapons like ICBMs, but a dirty bomb is effective in its own way. And they know how to refine uranium. I'm not sure they're too weak for war. They just know they can't win against the US.
A dirty bomb is not "nuclear technology" and also it's a Hollywood meme.
As opposed to the Taliban selling off girls for marriage THEN raping them legally. >_>
And the Taliban was ready, largely because Trump made a deal with them.
And, of course, all the women who were no longer allowed to have a job or go to school. Pretty sure they didn't support the taliban. Not to mention the large amount of people who fled the country or tried to. I'm sure they supported the government. But keep looking at it with Trump tinted glasses.
I didn't say the Taliban is good. The Taliban is morally superior to the Afghani government that the US installed. The US really likes installing terrible governments, you pointed that out earlier with Iran.
So,if Trump wanted to do LESS buisness, why did he insist on doing more?
Did we actually do more business with China?
The Chinese Trade War ended with Trump DEMANDING and gettting (but they didn't follow through) China to have MORE business with America.
Saudi Arabia got weapons: https://www.forumarmstrade.org/resource-page---trump--saudi-arms-sales1.html
North Korea didn't get much except for some new sactions Trump put on Chineese shipping companies that go to NK being removed. But we didn't do business with them anyway so can't do any less.
And nothing really changed under Trump with regards to Russia trade. So... didn't do less there!
Can you name a dictator that Trump's actions and policy ended with the dictator doing LESS business with the US?
Let's see, does China and Russia ring any bells? You just admitted he reduced trade with China. Are you going to walk that back now? And Russia, Trump insisted that the EU stop relying on Russia for trade goods, and it worked to a slight extent. But let me guess, you think that's a bad thing now. We don't want to be too mean to Russia.
And that's cute how you think Putin was afraid of Trump. Isn't the source for that particular rumor Trump himself?
Putin quite literally said he refused to invade Ukraine because Trump "didn't understand geopolitics". He waited until Biden entered office, as he knew Trump would "overreact" to the invasion. In much the same way you think Trump did something very bad when he had an Iranian general rightfully killed. Had Putin invaded Ukraine while Trump was president, Trump probably would have started ordering the deaths of Russian generals.
I don't live in the US so I've no real feel for how the economy is doing, but I've read some stuff which indicates the US economy is pretty strong right now. Although interestingly the perception is that it's doing poorly. There seems to be a gap between the perception and the reality
https://www.vox.com/politics/24094752/biden-trump-strong-economy-2024-inflation
Citing "the stock market is hitting all time highs!" while people in America are struggling with their grocery bills is precisely the kind of insanity I was making fun of you for earlier. Did you even read the article? "Unemployment is low, the fed rate is stable (at a high rate) and the stock market is hitting all time highs!" What in the good god does that have to do with the average person in a struggling economy? Nothing. It has nothing to do with the experience of the average person. The dollar is worth 15% less than it was just three years ago. Of fucking course the stock market is at an all-time-high!
Do you have any idea how frustrating it is to have media constantly present these "the economy is great, peasants, why are you so mad?" articles that are as disconnected from reality as you are? The average person in America can't give three shits about the stock market. The unemployment rate is so low because people are having to take multiple jobs just to not starve to death. The author of that article (and every other "the economy is great! why are you mad?) article should be fired from a cannon into the sun.
Because none of the "evidence" Trump presented stood up to any scrutiny.
If you're going make a claim like Trump did then you have to provide evidence and he couldn't. He spouted a load of baseless rhetoric on Twitter (before he got banned). Anyone can do that. But every time his claims were tested in court they failed. Every audit confirmed the initial results. There's just no credible evidence that the election was rigged against Trump.
It's almost like the lack of voter ID makes any evidence of voter fraud that much harder to track down, and yet one side is vehemently against the concept of introducing voter ID. Really makes me think.