Pages: < Back  1 ... 566 567 [568]   Go Down

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11340 on: May 06, 2024, 05:26:58 PM »
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7684
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11341 on: May 06, 2024, 09:54:43 PM »
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 05:26:58 PM
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 06, 2024, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 12:52:11 PM
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11342 on: May 07, 2024, 10:04:21 AM »
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 06, 2024, 09:54:43 PM
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 05:26:58 PM
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 06, 2024, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 12:52:11 PM
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
I am sure you are not sure.

I am sure submitting a false report of the order of contents of a box to a US District Court judge in a trial concerning the mishandling of documents is mishandling documents.
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3374
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11343 on: May 07, 2024, 03:04:03 PM »
Who cares? Seriously, how is this a valid legal issue?
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y
*

Offline Roundy

  • Abdicator of the Zetetic Council
  • *
  • Posts: 4200
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11344 on: May 07, 2024, 03:53:50 PM »
It's a complete non-issue, just another example of Trump doing anything he can to delay or end the trial.

That he actually seems to think this is something to be taken seriously indicates a severe case of TDS on Action80's part, poor guy.  :(
Quote from: Tom Bishop on August 13, 2021, 02:44:29 AM
Dr. Frank is a physicist. He says it's impossible. So it's impossible.
My friends, please remember Tom said this the next time you fall into the trap of engaging him, and thank you. :)
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7684
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11345 on: May 07, 2024, 04:06:07 PM »
Quote from: Action80 on May 07, 2024, 10:04:21 AM
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 06, 2024, 09:54:43 PM
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 05:26:58 PM
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 06, 2024, 02:03:54 PM
Quote from: Action80 on May 06, 2024, 12:52:11 PM
So, an illegitimate "special prosecutor" introduces a bald-faced lie to the court:
https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/trump-says-jack-smith-should-be-arrested-after-documents-revelation-5644083?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-05-2&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn


Wait... OMG! 
Wait...OMG!

You mean Trump is being prosecuted for mishandling classified documents, yet the lead prosecutor's office is allowed to freely mishandle the same documents?
I'm not sure the article you posted would agree.
I'm not sure YOU would agree.  Unless you think putting objects back in teh same box but not the exact same configuration is "mishandling".
I am sure you are not sure.

I am sure submitting a false report of the order of contents of a box to a US District Court judge in a trial concerning the mishandling of documents is mishandling documents.

Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.

Therefore its not relevant and not mishandling.  And if this is Trump legal defence, he really has none.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11346 on: May 07, 2024, 07:36:57 PM »
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 07, 2024, 04:06:07 PM
Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.
FTFY.
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7684
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11347 on: May 07, 2024, 08:07:36 PM »
Quote from: Action80 on May 07, 2024, 07:36:57 PM
Quote from: Lord Dave on May 07, 2024, 04:06:07 PM
Is the order relevant to the charges?
No.Yes.
FTFY.
Why?
Which of the charges relates to the order or position of the documents inside the box?
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11348 on: May 08, 2024, 02:23:08 PM »
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3374
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11349 on: May 08, 2024, 03:30:53 PM »
Yes, it's almost as if one party in this case is doing everything they can to keep delaying this trial until the election in the hopes of winning the presidency and making all their legal problems go away. I wonder who it could be?
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7684
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11350 on: May 08, 2024, 03:56:42 PM »
Quote from: Action80 on May 08, 2024, 02:23:08 PM
Jack Smith is such a total fuck up, the judge cannot even decide when to begin the trial.

https://www.theepochtimes.com/us/judge-delays-trump-documents-trial-wont-set-new-date-5645658?utm_source=RTNews&src_src=RTNews&utm_campaign=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&src_cmp=rtbreaking-2024-05-07-5&utm_medium=email&est=AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAa%2BcidhsJxcPN%2FrQut3NAH7F5ww0LIzwgbOIBKcVOYUPVwjDotRvn

Two more weeks.

Considering all the hearings are motions from the defence that the judge decided to grant, likely because she's a Trump lover, I disagree that he 'fucked up'.
« Last Edit: May 08, 2024, 05:40:22 PM by Lord Dave »
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
*

Offline garygreen

  • *
  • Posts: 3239
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11351 on: May 08, 2024, 05:04:32 PM »
of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on
I have visited from prestigious research institutions of the highest caliber, to which only our administrator holds with confidence.
*

Offline Lord Dave

  • *
  • Posts: 7684
  • Grumpy old man.
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11352 on: May 08, 2024, 05:40:54 PM »
Quote from: garygreen on May 08, 2024, 05:04:32 PM
of course the president should be absolutely above the law, that's exactly the idea this country was founded on

Only if they're white men tho.  Women and blacks are excluded.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on December 21, 2020, 04:49:03 AM
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11353 on: May 11, 2024, 07:11:45 AM »
Quote from: honk on May 08, 2024, 03:30:53 PM
Yes, it's almost as if one party in this case is doing everything they can to keep delaying this trial until the election in the hopes of winning the presidency and making all their legal problems go away. I wonder who it could be?
Yes, it's almost as if a bunch of fascists want to decry and eliminate due process within US courts.

I wonder who it could be?

Hint: ^ Look at the author of the post above.
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
*

Offline honk

  • *
  • Posts: 3374
  • resident goose
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11354 on: May 14, 2024, 01:19:48 AM »
Again, I still don't understand exactly how wanting someone who has been charged with multiple crimes to have their day in court is wanting to "eliminate due process;" much less how having that same person entirely avoid having their day in court by being elected president and then abusing their office to make their legal problems go away is totally fine.
ur retartet but u donut even no it and i walnut tell u y

Offline Action80

  • *
  • Posts: 2848
    • View Profile
Logged
Re: Trump
« Reply #11355 on: May 15, 2024, 02:41:25 AM »
Wow, you want the "day in court," based on this.

« Last Edit: May 15, 2024, 04:08:49 AM by Action80 »
Quote from: AllAroundTheWorld on August 04, 2018, 09:02:51 AM
To be honest I am getting pretty bored of this place.
Pages: < Back  1 ... 566 567 [568]   Go Up