All of my questions are coherent and answerable, hence why we are having this conversation.
Okay. Well, since your core question relies on a number of false premises, I am unable to answer it meaningfully. Make of that what you will.
How do you think I found this place?
Our main acquisition channels are search engines and social media services, so I'd my guess would be one of those.
However, this does not answer my question. If you did meet someone like that here, could you quote them? It would be interesting to see.
So far the only ones I've heard is "the videos are fake" and "people are facing the wrong direction."
Quotes, please. Who on this forum said that?
You can't blame me that you don't have much material out there. I did as much research as I could and I still have a lot of questions.
I can blame you for not bothering to read the basics, and I will do so.
You don't think going to sea and seeing ships going over the horizon would change your perspective? I find that rather odd to say the least.
That's because you operate under the incorrect assumption that I haven't done it before. Much like with the core question of this thread, as soon as you accept a false premise, all logic goes out the window.
You'd think if the earth was flat the Navy would be your greatest supporters. You'd think if the round earth model didn't work that the people who travel thousands of miles at sea would be the first people to point it out. If the earth was flat then traveling along great circle routes would actually waste fuel rather than save it. I'd love it if I could see ships from hundreds of miles away or if my radar wasn't limited by the curvature of the earth. I'd love it if I didn't have to put the bridge or my lookouts at the highest points in the ship (since the higher you go the worse the swaying motion gets in a storm.) But sadly the earth is curved and I do have to do all of these things.
Your image of the FE model is extremely inaccurate. It's almost difficult to figure out what you mean, because you focus so hard on ripping into a hypothetical FE model nobody here supports.
I'd never mock someone for their service to their country. That's disgusting. You really should be ashamed of yourself.
lol, this brand of "patriotism" will never cease to amuse me. But, for the sake of avoidance of doubt: I never mocked you for your service to your country. I mocked your insistence on showing off. This was clearly indicated in the original statement: "you took your time to brag about it"
Then I'm sure you've already published a master's thesis.
You would be wrong. Once again, you operate on a false assumption. I'm not American, and my Master's degree is not an MSc nor an MA. You also seem to be under the impression that I'd reveal my identity to a random person on the Internet.
I've already read all this stuff. It didn't answer my questions.
Most of the glaring holes in your understanding of FET are covered there. Once you've read through these, you can start amending your questions.
Do you also suffer from short term memory loss? Your response "doesn't even convey a coherent thought." Unfortunately, "your fantasies...do very little to affect reality." I hope that one day I can say "for the first time in forever, you managed to make an accurate observation." I've been craving a debate and "I'd love to attack your arguments, but you have yet to make any."
All of these things relate to the things you said, not to your person. The key phrases there are "that" [the sentence quoted above], "your fantasies", "your arguments" [or lack thereof].
Yes, its a diversion. Instead of answering the question you just resort to character attacks and insults. All you do is ad hominem arguments.
Your question cannot be meaningfully answered, and your character has yet to be attacked.
Its a pretty simple question, I have no idea why it is unanswerable.
That would be due to your reliance on false premises and your unwillingness to review or explain them.
Who is lying about the earth being flat? Who knows that it is flat and yet continues to provide false evidence that it is round?
Finally, a question that's both coherent and which doesn't rely on a laundry list of assumptions. I can answer that one for you. Strictly speaking: probably nobody.
I already did......are you sure you don't have short term memory loss?
Yes, I am sure your personal attack doesn't hold much water. For example: I asked, multiple times, whether the people who you claim dismiss the apparent motions of stars as "fake" were from the Flat Earth Society. The closest you've come to answering this question is "How do you think I found this place?".
How am attacking you or your personality?
For one, you keep suggesting that I suffer from at least two mental deficiencies: a short-term memory loss and poor reading comprehension. You also said I should be ashamed of myself.
I am merely pointing out that when a person does not have any concrete evidence to support their claims it is very common for them to resort to misdirection or insults.
I agree, your "memory loss" schtick is very telling.
If you had concrete evidence then you would have already presented it to me and this discussion would have been over several posts ago.
An interesting assumption, but there are many other reasons for which I might not want to waste my time on educating you.