Offline jimster

  • *
  • Posts: 307
    • View Profile
Can we believe Michelson Morley?
« on: November 13, 2024, 09:14:15 PM »
One of the proof points in the wiki is Michelson-Morley. FE says electromagnetic acceleration explains why the sun appears to go down below the horizon yet is actually always circling above us. Since EA has no equations, experiments or explanations, can RE dismiss Michelson Morley by postulating an unknown force without equations, experiments or explanation? Seems only fair. Under the rule that you can invalidate observations without equations, experiments, or explanations, can't you make any claim on the shape of the earth?
I am really curious about so many FE things, like how at sunset in Denver, people in St Louis see the dome as dark with stars, while people in Salt Lake City see the same dome as light blue. FE scientists don't know or won't tell me.

*

Offline Pete Svarrior

  • e
  • Planar Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 16317
  • (◕˽ ◕ ✿)
    • View Profile
Re: Can we believe Michelson Morley?
« Reply #1 on: November 13, 2024, 10:07:27 PM »
EA has no equations
Incorrect

experiments
False

or explanations
Unsubstantiated.

Jimster, I'm gonna be straight with you. We've received a few complaints about you repeatedly starting threads that are either made in abysmally poor faith, or which are straight up rehashes of your old posts. I haven't acted on these. I am now, politely, asking you to stop. The next response will be proportionately less polite.
Read the FAQ before asking your question - chances are we already addressed it.
Follow the Flat Earth Society on Twitter and Facebook!

If we are not speculating then we must assume