1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 06, 2023, 08:32:51 PM »

You have nothing useful to contribute.

I see.

My commentary can only be useful as that which I am criticizing.

stack simply engaged in a "CONTINUE TO SLUR THE DOCTOR WHO OFFERS SOUND MEDICAL ADVICE," because the FDA and CDC instituted gag orders on his website (which if you bothered to check, still has much the same information present).

That sentence is something else, man.  I promise, that if you edit it to make sense, I will respond to it.

That will not fly for much longer, because the doctor has actually filed suit to end the bullshit actions taken by these lying asswipes in these agencies.

That sounds way more libellous than anything Stack wrote.

No one here cares about your worthless opinion of me.

At least you do, obviously.

Serial idiocy is also quite destructive. You should get that checked out.

Sayonara, Joe.

The real question is where is the evidence that this "doctor's" medical advice is effective?  Could your next comment be the one where you finally provide positive evidence for something; anything really?

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 06, 2023, 08:10:23 PM »

Showing the history of the FDA and other US government entities attempting to quash effective alternative methods of treatment for Covid and other respiratory illnesses, simply due to the desire to mandate a vaccine, is hardly the "gotcha," you think it is.

Current evidence actually demonstrates Vitamin C and D have always been an effective way to mitigate the harmful effects and alleviate symptoms of, not only Covid, but all forms of respiratory illness.

The officials and bureau(pieces of)craps within the FDA, CDC, and NIH, have clearly demonstrated over the past four years or so a strong predilection toward purposefully lying to the public at large.

You are so strong to move the goal posts so quickly.

Yeah, I agree stack moves goalposts very quickly.

Now, do you have anything related to the topic at hand?

It's ok if you don't understand how quotes work, just own up to it.  Related to the topic at hand... Stack substantiated his point, you moved the goal posts.  Stack looks to be correct in everything except the way he refers to "reply x".  You are shitting the bed in this debate, he is not.  That doctor is a crank and that is probably why you are defending him.  Serial contrarian behaviour is very destructive, you should see about getting help.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 06, 2023, 08:01:23 PM »

Showing the history of the FDA and other US government entities attempting to quash effective alternative methods of treatment for Covid and other respiratory illnesses, simply due to the desire to mandate a vaccine, is hardly the "gotcha," you think it is.

Current evidence actually demonstrates Vitamin C and D have always been an effective way to mitigate the harmful effects and alleviate symptoms of, not only Covid, but all forms of respiratory illness.

The officials and bureau(pieces of)craps within the FDA, CDC, and NIH, have clearly demonstrated over the past four years or so a strong predilection toward purposefully lying to the public at large.

You are so strong to move the goal posts so quickly.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 04, 2023, 11:39:51 PM »

Wow you found something on the internet that agrees with you! How compelling.

5

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: February 04, 2023, 07:10:00 PM »

I haven't seen that it is misinformation. That is exactly how the CDC defines it on their website:

https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/70/wr/mm7021e3.htm#:~:text=For%20this%20surveillance%2C%20a%20vaccine,%2Dauthorized%20COVID%2D19%20vaccine.

Words are hard, Tom. Let’s do it together. The CDC is not talking about people being “unvaccinated” in your quote. It’s the opposite. They are talking a “vaccine breakthrough infection” (the secret is that they wrote that). That vaccines aren’t instantly effective is well known and documented and trying to make this seem like anything other than commonplace medicine is misinformation. Assuming the negative corollary of a breakthrough infection is that people are “unvaccinated” is stupid. So kindly learn a little before you listen to shitheads like the one you quoted.

6

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Superhero Movies & Comics General

« on: February 01, 2023, 02:04:21 PM »

I guess they are trying to push Waller as a Nick Fury type character? Viola Davis is awesome so with the right script it could be a sleeper hit.

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 29, 2023, 06:12:33 PM »

 :'(

“Further analysis showed that the average fully vaccinated German would reach minus-100% immune system degradation by the end of January 2022.“

This means that literally every fully vaccinated German would already be dead, so obviously this isn’t true.

No it does not.

'-100% degredation' is a double negative.  So it means that fully vaccinated people will have 100% strong immune system.

True. Anyway, between Tom and Action69 this thread is giving me a headache. I’m out for now.

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 29, 2023, 03:51:44 PM »

“Further analysis showed that the average fully vaccinated German would reach minus-100% immune system degradation by the end of January 2022.“

This means that literally every fully vaccinated German would already be dead, so obviously this isn’t true.

9

Arts & Entertainment / Re: Flat Earth AI Poems by ChatGPT

« on: January 26, 2023, 02:35:52 PM »

ChatGPT gets it.

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 22, 2023, 09:12:19 PM »

This is the fallacy of "Trust the Science" and appeals to authority:

They aren't looking because there is no public health basis to do so and because doing so would only serve to feed the idiot trolls, like yourself.  No fallacy there, just troll idiots, like yourself.

11

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 10, 2023, 08:01:29 PM »

"When is the FBI going to raid the many homes of Joe Biden, perhaps even the White House? These documents were definitely not declassified."

I suppose the answer to his question is they FBI will raid Biden after he ignores multiple requests, for over a year, for documents to be returned and after he has lied about having said documents in his possession.

12

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: January 10, 2023, 02:52:01 PM »

Biden just gave Trump a masterclass on how to responsibly deal with finding classified docs in your possession inappropriately. Surprisingly, he didn’t claim he was being harassed, that his passport was stolen or that he could declassify documents with a thought. Just notified NARA and immediately returned them. Can’t wait for the GOP to attempt to equate the two situations. Perhaps this will be the first attempt at impeaching Biden?

13

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 08, 2023, 02:55:29 PM »

Tap-Dancing Tom Bishop has to latch on to inappropriate hyperbole from Stack to cover up how shitty his source and argument are.

What's hyperbole to me is lying by claiming that 1600+ people died or were harmed by a vaccine when rafts of them have no evidence of being vaccinated. I mean, that's just an out and out lie.
Now my hyperbole may be that there shouldn't be a single error in the morbid list. But when I keep finding ones where the author even went to the trouble of linking to news articles as if proof of COVID Injections as the killer and no mention of COVID Injections is found, time and time again, it is clear the source is dubious at best and indefensible.

I got you. I was steel-manning your position. By giving the most uncharitable version, Tom has less room to concoct the inevitable bullshit.

14

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: January 07, 2023, 09:36:09 PM »

Tap-Dancing Tom Bishop has to latch on to inappropriate hyperbole from Stack to cover up how shitty his source and argument are.

15

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Midterms 2022

« on: January 05, 2023, 08:54:51 PM »

How many votes until the house has a speaker?

16

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Who makes these images?

« on: January 01, 2023, 03:37:21 PM »

And, as typical of FE'ers, that explanation (no matter how reasonable) must be hand waved away.

Hand-waved? Not at all. It's just strange that a magical lightsaber showed up in these very legitimate photos, and its existence was only retconned in after people pointed out that it looked strange.

Why are you so sad that NASA is protecting people from a Sith invasion?

17

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: December 28, 2022, 01:13:13 PM »

That could just mean that he was giving patients expensive heart medication based on prior medical history or alternate tests without going through Medicaid's 1800's-level antiquated cardio tests designed to act as a barrier to allow only the most extreme cases through to the medicine, that Medicaid demands to perform before they dole out the cash.

There is a difference between blatant unethical fraud and pro-patient ethical fraud to protect them from a tyrannical government, and it is unclear what happened. Based on the ridiculous example of the throat swab test where the "fraud" was doing something ethical for the patient, the picture is pretty dim for the government's side.

The document is vague and unspecific about exactly what he did for a reason. Not a good reason.

He literally said he billed Medicaid $85,000 for tests he did not perform. You are really struggling here.

18

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: December 28, 2022, 03:39:50 AM »

He said himself that he falsely billed Medicaid for $85,000 for tests he didn’t perform. Sounds like pretty open and shut case of fraud.

19

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: December 27, 2022, 04:10:35 PM »

I was just kidding earlier, but it seems as though Tom's position genuinely is that we can only go by Hannity outright declaring bluntly that it is his belief that the election was stolen. We can't interpret his words and actions in a reasonable manner. Only an outright declaration on his part is sufficient evidence.

Assuming that for Tom, sufficient evidence does not exist, seems reasonable.

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: December 27, 2022, 03:50:44 PM »

Anyway
..
Pretty sure someone already posted this:

“And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden,” Hannity exclaimed on Nov. 9. “They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, ‘glitched’ in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon.”

Seems like he believed it to me.

The full quote to that shows that he was searching for answers and seeking an investigation, not that he came to the answer and was calling fraud:

https://www.mediamatters.org/media/3921896

And in the state of Michigan, Republicans are moving in to investigate this software glitch called Dominion that actually changed thousands of votes from Trump to Biden. They caught it. Now, the same software also, quote, “glitched” in Georgia and was used in as many as 28 states, according to John Solomon. We need real answers. Why should we, as a country, be OK when that happened? And shouldn't we investigate it so that every American has confidence in the outcome?

Yeah he was.  Thats almost literally what he said.

"Why shoud we, as a country, be ok when that happened?" -stating its a fact that it happened.
He's saying "these glitches happened and we should investigste them so we know who really won the election"

Calling for an investigation and uncovering of answers is withholding judgement until an investigation can be conducted. In a court you are judged after the evidence is presented and the jury gives its verdict, not before. By calling for an investigation he is saying that he doesn't have the answers, and it needs to be investigated.

Ie: “Is Lord Dave a serial killer? We need answers. Everyone should be shocked by the eye witness claims. The claims need to be investigated.”

This is not calling you a serial killer. It is suggesting that it needs to be determined if you are one.

He also doesn’t mention that this “glitch” was investigated and determined to be human error, confirming his belief that the election results were not in question. Because he is a liar.