The weird thing is that under any other president, including Dubya, a news story that implied that he was considering invading Mexico could be easily dismissed. With Trump, you really have to double-check.
If we are not speculating then we must assume
According to Mexico, he did not www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/mexico-deny-donald-trump-send-troops-over-us-mexico-border-president-enrique-pena-nieto-american-a7558526.htmlDon't forget that Saddam's source was ABC
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
Eh, I'm iffy on trusting the Mexican president on this. Context and tone would help and it could have been a joke or an offer of aid more than anything else.
Quote from: Lord Dave on February 02, 2017, 12:00:04 PMEh, I'm iffy on trusting the Mexican president on this. Context and tone would help and it could have been a joke or an offer of aid more than anything else.More or less iffy than you are on trusting an anonymous person who provided one alleged sentence of a phone conversation, and one sentence only?
Eh, I trust the AP.https://apnews.com/0b3f5db59b2e4aa78cdbbf008f27fb49
Quote from: Lord Dave on February 02, 2017, 12:34:44 PMEh, I trust the AP.https://apnews.com/0b3f5db59b2e4aa78cdbbf008f27fb49And they're telling you exactly what I told you. An unidentified source gave them a one-sentence excerpt. Why is this better than the same AP telling you that a person who actually partook in the conversation dismisses this allegation as lies?
Quote from: Ghost Spaghetti on February 02, 2017, 10:08:06 AMThe weird thing is that under any other president, including Dubya, a news story that implied that he was considering invading Mexico could be easily dismissed. With Trump, you really have to double-check.It correlates, yes, but the rapid decline of mainstream media started long before Trump. Naturally, few people paid attention before they started plastering accusations of fascism all over the place.
Trump threatened to cut off federal funding for UC Berkeley if they continue protesting against Milo.
I was using wording from another article, but yes, when shit's on fire, it's a riot.
https://twitter.com/TEN_GOP/status/827074607534469120
https://twitter.com/BakedNorwegian/status/827059707017846784
https://twitter.com/shane_bauer/status/827022173386649600
Quote from: trekky0623 on February 02, 2017, 03:48:40 PMTrump threatened to cut off federal funding for UC Berkeley if they continue protesting against Milo.I think this is one of those cases where Trump is just straight-up trolling. He's far too busy to be worrying about this.
And then there's Australia:http://www.cnn.com/2017/02/01/politics/malcolm-turnbull-donald-trump-pena-nieto/
when you try to mock anyone while also running the flat earth society. Lol
Wow...Ok, how do you fake syrian refugee status? And to what end? You still don't pick your country. You go where the un says.Also, cite source of that 70% please.
Quote from: Lord Dave on February 01, 2017, 06:21:53 PMWow...Ok, how do you fake syrian refugee status? And to what end? You still don't pick your country. You go where the un says.Also, cite source of that 70% please.Here's how migrants are faking refugee status.https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/europe/migrants-are-disguising-themselves-as-syrians-to-gain-entry-to-europe/2015/09/22/827c6026-5bd8-11e5-8475-781cc9851652_story.html
Here's the stats showing 70% of Muslim support at least some form of sharia law.http://pamelageller.com/2011/11/70-of-american-muslims-say-us-should-impose-sharia-legalized-polygamy.html/https://themuslimissue.wordpress.com/2013/05/04/statistics-the-muslim-worlds-problem-over-70-of-muslims-support-sharia-law-90-support-execution-of-apostates/