So what? Still no systemic fraud that altered the outcome of the election.
Your source didn't assess all counties. Your source only looked at a few counties, and in those sets found things which were hard to explain.
Like I said, so what? Still no systemic fraud that altered the outcome of the election. Period.
How did your source find no systemic fraud if he only looked at a few counties? You can't make a conclusion from what you presented. Quite disingenuous of you.
You've been making disingenuous conclusions based upon a single county here and there for over a month now. So you must be joking. As well as making disingenuous conclusions based upon a motor pool mechanic who Sydney Powell falsely claimed was a cyber security specialist, a day-drinking "witness", Some guy who is an economist, not a statistician making wild statistical claims...and on and on. So don't try and tell me I'm being disingenuous when you wrote the book on it and have been nothing but disingenuous since 11/3. Everyone can see that. I don't know why you can't.
And as far as sources go, how about former Attorney General and Trump loyalist, Bill Barr? Who said, "to date, we have not seen fraud on a scale that could have effected a different outcome in the election.”