This is a prime example of most debates. And the best question of all "What constitutes as evidence?"
If I look up and see blue? Is it evidence?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-4387270/Blue-black-dress-riddle-finally-solved.htmlIf you hear something, is it evidence? Only to you.
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/2018/05/18/brainstorm-green-needle-latest-audio-riddle-tricks-brain/But I have a picture/video! Thats evidence! Film or digital? Digital is easily editable (a lot of work to be good tho).
But science has proven it! Correct, science has proven this works in this situation until someone proves it doesnt work in another. Did you know E = MC2 isn't fully correct? E²=(mc²)²+(pc) is actually a better representation of E of a moving body. Until proven otherwise.
Science is fully of examples. We have a thought, we run test and analyze the data. If its consistent and repeatable over multiple variables then we consider it proven. Until proven it doesnt always work. BUT that doesnt mean we throw it out. We rework the problem. If we make changes and it works with the new variables AND the old variables (probably more accurate now) then its proven again.
If the new way doesnt work for the old stuff then we have to move on. Either restart both or split the 2 into their own understandings.
Dont shoot me...
Example. We discover magnetism. But how do we stay on the ground? We try to rewrite magnetism to incorporate humans and the earth. Doesnt work. So we keep magnetism and come up with gravity.
Every truth is truth, until proven otherwise (by REPEATABLE experiments).
You have hypothesis (no evidence), theory (evidence, but could be circumstantial) and law (evidence).
"Laws are descriptions — often mathematical descriptions — of natural phenomenon; for example, Newton's Law of Gravity or Mendel's Law of Independent Assortment. These laws simply describe the observation. Not how or why they work"
The difference between scientific laws and scientific facts is a bit harder to define, though the definition is important. Facts are simple, basic observations that have been shown to be true. Laws are generalized observations about a relationship between two or more things in the natural world. The law can be based on facts and tested hypothesizes.
So, even Laws are not 100%.
So when it comes to "truth" sometimes it really does depend on where you standing.