We have maps that are accurate enough and those maps are flat the same as the earth you travel on.
Then why do so many flat earthers like Tom Bishop and Max_Almond say that there is no accurate map?
Because if the distances shown on those maps are correct then the earth cannot be flat. So they have to claim the map is not accurate.
If they produced a flat earth map then it would be immediately shown wrong because it wouldn't match distances or other observations like sunrise/sunset times.
So they don't.
It's a bit like me saying "I'm thinking of a prime number which is also a square number" and you saying "that's not possible".
So long as I don't tell you what number I'm thinking of, you can spend all day going "4 is a square number but it isn't prime, it divides by 2, 9 is a square number but it isn't a prime number, it divides by 3" or "7 is a prime number, but it isn't the square of any whole number"
And I can just say "I'm not thinking of 4, 7 or 9..."
The fact is the globe has been mapped very accurately. The proof of this is the global airline and shipping industry. They get people and goods around reliably, they don't drop out of the sky because Paris was a lot further from New York than they thought it was. They don't get lost. They know where they are accurately, they know how fast they're travelling accurately.
I was on a plane back from Dubai recently, on these flights they have maps so you know where you are at any given point, they have cameras if you're not near a window. Now, I didn't spend 7 hours on a plane checking out of the window to see if I could identify landmarks and see if I was where they're claiming, but someone paranoid enough is free to do so. The claim that airlines don't know how fast they're going, that cable laying ships don't know how much cable they're laying across oceans, that the whole history of cartography has got it wrong is crazy.