Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Sounds like obliterate means “cause a few months delay”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/c79qeqg89g2o
From the above PBS article:But the site was obliterated, according to Trump. Shouldn't have BEEN survivors. And if Israel just wanted to kill anyone who tried to assess damage just because they can... yeah, that's a war crime.QuoteThe Israeli military also confirmed it struck roads around Iran’s Fordo enrichment facility to obstruct access to the site.
They took out the roads to prevent emergency responders from trying to help people who may have been trapped or dying in the rubble. This is reprehensible, and likely a war crime. Attacking the survivors of a bombing is distinctly different than the bombing of the infrastructure itself.
But Trump said they did. Hit that site and obliterated it. Then Israel hits the same spot again.Oh hey, something we all missed.Or, maybe the US and other previous strikes didn’t take out every possible target.
https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/israel-hits-iranian-government-targets-day-after-u-s-strikes-on-iranian-nuclear-sites
Apparently, Israel wanted to attack an already obliterated site. Weird, right? Almost like Trump is lying about how much damage was done. Probably why he's blocking congress from seeing the reports.
Before too long, they might have to start letting the illegals in again so that they have someone to deport.
The Trump administration has set a goal of 3,000 immigration arrests per day, or one million per year, claiming that it is targeting violent criminals. ICE data obtained by the Cato Institute show that over 93 percent of immigrants arrested this fiscal year were never convicted of any violent offenses.
Whisper it quietly, but he might have got this one right.He was raised to believe himself to be the best. His brain is just broken and now everything has to be at the extreme. Either extreme great (because he's never wrong according to everyone he pays), or extreme bad (for everything against him).
The ceasefire is holding, for now. Early days yet of course.
And naturally he's going "laa laa laa, can't hear you" at all the intelligence indicating the striker might have not been quite as effective at obliterating the Iranian nuclear sites as he's claiming.
I wonder what is wrong with him that he has to always claim the superlative, always be so absolute. All the "they said this was the greatest..." stuff. Who are "they"? And was it the greatest? (That's just an example, not referring to anything specific, just generally the way he talks such utter bollocks all the time.)
I do have criticisms about Trump...You do? Would you care to share some of them?
I've criticized that in Trump's first term his policies were too weak and he held back too much, giving leftists too many chances and too much leeway. Now that the gloves have come off in his second term Trump is doing what should have been done years ago, and the people love him for it.https://twitter.com/libsoftiktok/status/1935774344732361207
Come on, this is a safe space, Trump won't read this.Unless Tom is sending daily reports and we're all on the anti-trump revenge list.
A railroad across any ocean or to any ocean is not just unreasonable, it is simply stupid.Right?
I think Tom's interpretation is fair.And how do you think Tom would have interpreted it had Biden said it?
And this is the issue with Tom and the MAGA lot in general. The ones deep in the cult don't care what happens or what is said, they only care who did it. If it's Trump or Vance or one of the other MAGA then it's ThisIsFine.jpg, no matter how egregious what is said or done is. If it's Biden or any other Democrat then it's interpreted in the most unkind and malicious way possible.
It's a level of delusion and intellectual dishonestly which makes debate impossible.
They.So... "Trump fought in WW2 and was very helpful in securing it." - is something you'd understand as USA? Because typically we'd use the leader of the nation at that time, not currently.
Also, Trump seems to not understand that 80+ years have gone by and governments change, nor the whole cold war propaganda that he literally lived through.
Trump says to World Leader 2 "We lost half a million soldiers in WWII". World Leader 2 then says to someone else, referring to that conversation: "He lost half a million soldiers in WWII" and "He fought with us in WWII" Both of the later two sentences make perfect sense to consider Trump as the USA in this instance, considering that Trump is describing the USA as "we". Especially if during the conversation World Leader 2 clarified that "and he did fight, the US fought" to convey that "he" means the US.
So... "Trump fought in WW2 and was very helpful in securing it." - is something you'd understand as USA?He'll understand it whatever way his cult leader tells him to.
Imagine being an "independent thinker" and having such a slavish devotion to a narcissist's whims.
I like to think Tom is just trolling but I have a feeling he really is this much of a sheep.
