Is your narrative now that garlic happens to cure cancer in mice, and only mice, but all the human people who claim that garlic has helped their cancers are liars? Come on now. That is just incredulous.
First of all, I don't think you know what incredulous means.
Second of all, no, that is not my narrative. You are still making straw-man arguments. I did not claim those people are liars, nor did I claim garlic cures cancer in mice, nor did I claim garlic isn't potentially useful in fighting cancer in humans or mice. My "narrative" is that your claim that garlic is some kind of miracle cure is baseless.
Third of all, the articles don't claim that garlic cures cancer EVEN IN MICE. These
two articles that you provided claim that studies show that garlic can help prevent and shrink certain types of tumors in mice. Nowhere did they claim that the mice were cured of cancer. There is a difference. Slowing, shrinking, or preventing tumors is not the same as curing. It's definitely a step in the right direction, and potentially very useful, but it is not the same thing. Once again, those articles do not source the studies they reference, so take them with a grain of salt.
This article DOES source the studies it uses, and it shows mixed results for studies on humans. Some of the studies showed promising results, some did not. None showed that it was a perfect cure.
None of the articles you have provided reference any study that claims garlic cures cancer in either mice or men. If garlic is really the miracle cure that you think it is, why are there so many studies that only show a limited or no effect? Wouldn't those studies report a near 100% success rate if your claim was true?