Their way was completely untested.
But their way was tested. It was tested in vacuum chambers on earth. It was tested with an unmanned flight in earth orbit. It was tested with a manned flight in earth orbit. It was tested with a manned flight that came to within 10 miles of landing on the moon. It was tested with 6 manned landings on the moon. It was pushed beyond its design limits with the aborted Apollo 13 mission where lives were on the line.
How much testing have you done on your unpressurized LM idea?
If you are just trying to drive me insane, let me know, there have got to be more efficient ways than your constant run-around.
Their way was completely untested
No, it wasn't.
Mercury and Gemini programmes were used to work on the basics of orbital motion, docking, etc.
The actual Apollo Command and Service Modules and Lunar Module were tested in Earth orbit as part of Apollo missions 4 thru 10.
Apollo 10 did everything that Apollo 11 would do except land. The LM went to within a few miles of the lunar surface.
Untested? No, no, no......
Ditto for you, it's like talking to a brick wall.
But that isn't how science and engineering work. Science and engineering have very specific meaning for words so that there is as little confusion as possible.
Jesus christ will you stop whinging over nothing and focus on the science at some point?!
You seriously don't have any idea of what those experiments were or what it took to set them up, do you? Also, what's wrong with getting more samples from a wider area?
Are you ever going to say anything of substance?
Are you ever going to provide any evidence that 4.8 psi is too much strain for the LM to handle?
I have literally never said that it was, just that the constant pressurization and depressurization imparts unnecessary strain. Now will you stopp blatantly lying and answer a straight question already?!
By arguing that your LM would be better than NASA's LM implies that you accept the moon landings were real, otherwise we might just as well be arguing whether Superman could beat the Hulk in an arm wrestling match.
What are you on about?! I have and have always been demonstrating that the NASA claims of the moon landing were a propaganda piece, designed to play up the cool factor, fun trivia, the tin foil holding out vacuum, the bright and shining gold... It's impractical precisely because it's
not real, any sensible engineer would have pointed out that the much better solution would be both safer and uglier, but uglier's just unacceptable when you're not leaving Earth and want a propaganda victory.
And the fact that you are unable to defend your model, and indeed outright refuse to actually respond to straight questions, should tell you all you need to know about how much sense your party line really makes.