Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
YeahUnfortunately, the 17 year old punk wandering the streets with a rifle in my neighborhood was gunned down by the cops before he could kill any child molesters.
Well sometimes the child molesters win.
The fact of the matter is that anyone upset about the Rittenhouse trial sees a pedo getting shot in the pelvis and thinks "that could have been me!" It's certainly scary for the grab-the-minors demographic.
A determined population is more than capable of resisting an occupying army, even one with far superior technology. America's recent military failures in the Middle East are strong evidence of this. By the same token, though, it's not the possession of the weapons guaranteed by the Second Amendment that allows them to fight back. It's more a question of their resourcefulness and determination.
Sour grapes from an ineffectual troll who has no point.How many people at the US Capitol were armed?
Answer -0
You're just weak liar.
Fuck that. That piece of human shit, Trump, was going to send federal troops to my town to protect a Target store from protesters marching against a corrupt police force that has brutalized the people of this city for over a half century. They weren't armed either.
Every rioter in that photo is a traitor to this nation. The Republicans supporting Putin's agenda who opened the doors for these traitors are traitors. Fuck each and every one of those 'short bus retards' (their lawyer's words, not mine.)Seems like sour grapes.
It's pissed off grapes. I owned guns when I was 17. The idea that my mom and dad would let me take one of my rifles and go into the streets at night is incomprehensible. This little fuck head's parents are the real problem. So fuck them too.
Rittenhouse killed two known shitbags and his trial ended in a just verdict.
His parents are a far sight better than most.
How many people at the US Capitol were armed?
Answer -0
You're just weak liar.
Seems like sour grapes.
I've always believed that idea of an armed citizenry defending liberty from our federal government was an absolutely delusional redneck fantasy. I need the federal government to have resources and weaponry to defend us from powerful nation states all over the world. I want a government that can defend us from extremist terror groups with technology and intelligence.You mean the extremist terror groups it created?
/cloudfront-us-east-2.images.arcpublishing.com/reuters/X6SSN46MRROJZIL6AFVQG5FPEA.jpg)
I'm sorry, but I can't see this underage delinquent wandering around with a gun being part of the founding father's vision.Considering the Founding Father's (just one?) times, he would not be an "underage delinquent". He'd be a "man" by quite some margin. I'm not sure adding a lack of awareness of history to a terrible legal argument really helps your case.I didn't say the whole legal system is wrong, you're saying it's completely right.Don't try to strawman me. It will not work, and you'll just make yourself look sillier in the process. You said the following, word for word:The 2nd Amendment says nothing about individual gun rights.
This is directly at odds both with the current interpretation of the 2nd Amendment (you know, the thing that's legally binding) and with its literal text ("the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed"). Regardless of how much it affects your "snowflake" feelings, and regardless of how much you retcon what you mean by "the 2nd Amendment", you were incorrect.The other kid with a gun didn't get a chance to discuss the constitution.This is an interesting, if extremely amateurish, rhetorical device you're using there. "Someone else was subject to a grave injustice, therefore Rittenhouse should also be subjected to it." I'm sure you can see just how unhelpful that sounds. Speak truth to power and demand justice for the guy that got gunned down. Don't try to bring everyone else down to the level you consider unjust.
The Supreme Court has fucked up time and time again over the years.Ah, yes, the entire legal system is wrong, and only you (with your extensive qualifications in law) are correct. Truly a hallmark of good debate.Read the actual text of the 2nd Amendment.What does that have to do with anything in a case law/common law system?
Nonetheless:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
Which part of "the right of the people to keep and bear Arms shall not be infringed" confuses you? Is it "people"? Or are you just hyperfocusing on the prefatory clause of that sentence?
You have no evidence he was polishing the rifle in his mom's house.
Just another lie.
And before the conservatard snowflakes start whining about the 2nd Amendment, The 2nd Amendment says nothing about individual gun rights. The citizens have a right to bear arms in the form of a well regulated militia as a balance of power against the Feds. It doesn't mean some punk gets to wander the streets at night with a rifle.I'm not sure that quite aligns with the actual state of the law. Perhaps you could point towards some precedent of the 2nd Amendment being interpreted this way by US courts?
Yep, I'm doing the Security + exam, probably late December, Early January. Not for anything specific now, just for down the road.
The newest version is a real pain in the ass. The two study guides I used were 150 pages long each, and they were supposed to be the condensed versions of the information.
I think I just like stacking certs and working at my comfy Socialist government job. But for real, I had a 2nd interview today with a managed security service provider and I think I'll take it.
https://www.newsweek.com/qanon-claim-jfk-jr-reappear-dallas-texas-announce-donald-trump-president-1644851
Hey look, Qanon is still at it and as batshit crazy as ever!
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/top-doctors-and-scientists-sue-the-fda-to-obtain-the-data-used-to-approve-pfizer-jab/You pick and destroy details of peer reviewed studies but you believe this stuff?
The data used to approve the vaccine was not publicly released and the FDA is actively fighting to keep it secret. Despicable.
The interview is not very convincing to be honest. He doesn't seem much to me like a man who brushed the face of God. More like an old hack, hamming it up in a badly cast cameo.
