2001: A Space Odyssey specifically demonstrated how real any images from supposed outer space would appear and they could be definitively faked.
No, it did not.
You are being highly disingenuous and should be banned for trolling the upper fora.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2001:_A_Space_Odyssey_(film)"The film is noted for its scientifically accurate depiction of spaceflight, pioneering special effects, and ambiguous imagery..."
"Time provided at least seven different mini-reviews of the film in various issues in 1968, each one slightly more positive than the preceding one; in the final review dated December 27, 1968, the magazine called 2001 "an epic film about the history and future of mankind, brilliantly directed by Stanley Kubrick. The special effects are mindblowing."[146]"
"Stanley Kubrick made the ultimate science fiction movie, and it is going to be very hard for someone to come along and make a better movie, as far as I'm concerned. On a technical level, it can be compared, but personally I think that '2001' is far superior."—George Lucas, 1977[117]"
"The influence of 2001 on subsequent filmmakers is considerable. Steven Spielberg, George Lucas and others, including many special effects technicians, discuss the impact the film has had on them in a featurette titled Standing on the Shoulders of Kubrick: The Legacy of 2001, included in the 2007 DVD release of the film. Spielberg calls it his film generation's "big bang", while Lucas says it was "hugely inspirational", labeling Kubrick as "the filmmaker's filmmaker". Sydney Pollack refers to it as "groundbreaking", and William Friedkin states 2001 is "the grandfather of all such films"."
As a matter of fact, one need only compare
2001: A Space Odyssey to
2010:The Year We Make Contact to fully realize the effects created were actually superior in
2001 even though
2010 utilized CGI.
So, your entire contribution and line of thought is devoid of any meaning and demonstrably proven to be just so much hot air.
You are behaving as a senseless troll.
Begone!