Why should TFES care about this? Well, it'll pass overhead a large fraction of the earth (between 58 degrees North and 58 degrees South) and with just a ham radio, you can confirm for yourself that satellites actually exist by communicating with one directly
How does such communication confirm that the satellite is in orbit around a globe?
Do you understand how satellite tv works?
The same question applies to Satellite TV as well.
Tom, how does satellite TV work? (or maybe more specifically, how do satellites in general work on a flat Earth)
The Wiki is silent on this subject - search for the word "satellite" and you get one page where the word is used in the context of the moon being a satellite - and the other is this
https://wiki.tfes.org/Space_Travel - which is just a bunch of "red-links" (links to pages that either have not been written - or which have been deleted).
I've seen people here saying that satellites DO exist (but follow some funky path like the sun does) - or that they DON'T exist, but their services are faked with high-altitude balloons or fixed towers.
If they DO exist - then it's hard to explain away the photos they produce - and that there are geostationary AND low-earth orbits. Particularly troubling for all FE maps is satellites in polar orbits - because these would have to follow even more bizarre paths. The concept of this "flow" that carries stars and moon and sun around the sky in their patterns would have problems transporting some satellites in an equatorial orbit and others in a polar orbit - it can't flow in different directions at the same time.
If they DON'T exist - then it's hard to explain the fact that you can often see them with naked eye as they cross the sky - and FE'ers are soon going to have to explain how anyone who wishes to can track the progress of FalconSat-3 across their local sky using nothing more than an amateur radio transmitter.
It'll be interesting to see which of these claims Tom will want to go with. Either way - the argument that counters his claim will be easy to disprove.