Tom, you keep bringing up your magic perspective. There are several threads in the debate section in which it has been taken to task, because it's ludicrous. It would show good faith to answer those objections before continuing using it. Considering how perspective works in the real world, the explanation above is gobbledygook
The thread where I got those quotes from was not responded to. If no one responds to me I win, right? Why not respond to my winning argument?
that's not correct, you kept ignoring the answers, and kept stating without reasons that perspective should somehow be different when stuff is far away.
You say this everytime, by the way, and never motivate it. As I already asked time and again in a thread precisely about perspective you've apparently run away from (did you lose, there?):
Perspective is a consequence of how our vision works.
It's based on 3 assumptions:
A) we (and cameras) perceive the world by means of light being emitted or reflected by objects.
B) light travels in straight lines.
C) the actual positions of the objects and observer are known.
Do you agree with those assumptions?