Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an obvious truth then the evidence is fabricated
P2) The Flat Earth is an obvious truth
Now I understand what you are saying.Nope.
Yes, the airport is built on higher land a couple of miles away. The Nile only falls a foot.
Photos can be manipulated to show what the photographer wants. Take a step back, be too close or take a photo from a slight angle, and it can be manipulated. The horizon always meets the eye level, it was proved in the 1800s. Honestly, its embarrassing how your blind Faith in 'science' will not let you see the forest for the trees.
He's right. This experiment is not carefully calibrated or controlled. A slight angle with that experiment can cause issues. It is just one guy holding a camera in one hand and his water device in the other. It's a bad experiment.
The whole point was to do it yourself.
Can anyone manipulate your own expetriment but you?
Bear in mind that others can do the same and see if you are telling the truth.
Author of the video also knew it.
Get transparent hula-hoop (or hose), fill it with painted liquid and go hiking.
It will be good for your health.
Exactly!You say he's not a Dr, yet can provide no proof whatsoever to back up those claims. We can at least point to his grave, what have you got?How are you expecting anyone to prove a negative?
There are none so blind as those who cannot see.Finally, you've written something I agree with...
What in the FE model powers the sun and keeps it shining? And if it is circling above the flat earth then what keeps it in the sky? Why doesn't it fall on us? I see that seasons are explained by the circular motion changing so it is a tighter circle in summer and bigger circle in winter. What causes the sun to move between these orbits and what makes it speed up in winter and slow down in summer as it would have to as the circumference of the circle changes, otherwise the day / night cycle would change length
Confused here. Are you saying the Nile flows through Luxor airport?Not sure how it's not contributing. All I was asked is why Luxor airport is higher in elevation. Logic would dictate it was built on higher land.Well yeah. That's the point. And the Nile flows nearby and isn't in a massive ditch. So clearly the Nile doesn't just drop 1 foot along its whole length.
Glad we've finally agreed that.
He's right. This experiment is not carefully calibrated or controlled. A slight angle with that experiment can cause issues. It is just one guy holding a camera in one hand and his water device in the other. It's a bad experiment.The experiment itself is fine. The only issue with the video of the experiment is the camera is not on a tripod. The result is still pretty clear but to show that even more clearly I posted stills from parts of the video where the level in the two tubes is clearly the same and thus you can easily determine whether the horizon is at or above or below that level. The result is clear, it's at eye level at sea level, below eye level at altitude and the higher the altitude the more below eye level it is, exactly as expected.
Not sure how it's not contributing. All I was asked is why Luxor airport is higher in elevation. Logic would dictate it was built on higher land.Well yeah. That's the point. And the Nile flows nearby and isn't in a massive ditch. So clearly the Nile doesn't just drop 1 foot along its whole length.
Right. Well as Westprog said if you're looking for consistency then you're going to be disappointed.The Wiki says it's because of perspective.Hi AllAround, I think you missed my point. I know the wiki explains that perspective is the reason that at certain latitudes Polaris ceases to be visible. I'm looking for an explanation or evidence from Flat Earth people to support the other claim from Rowbotham that "polaris has been seen from as far south as Capricorn". I want to know what evidence they have to support this claim, and if it is true why has no-one yet photographed it. Not seen any answers yet.
https://wiki.tfes.org/Shifting_Constellations
Same way they explain sunset. Wrongly, obviously, in both cases. On a flat earth the sun would be visible 24 hours a day and all stars not close to the horizon (which could be occluded by closer hills, for example, would be visible from everywhere. If Polaris is straight above the north pole then you'd be able to see it from everywhere. You can't, because the earth isn't flat.
Why do you think it's always so sunny there?Dr Rowbotham has measured the distance already.You realise that his experiment had the sun 400 miles south of London, somewhere directly over France, right?
That Tesla in space is a fake, it's nothing more than CGI. You have to be seriously brainwashed to believe there's a Tesla in orbit.
Prove it, come on. We're not the ones brainwashed here. You are. You can't go spouting random claims without evidence.
The evidence is that it shows something which proves something which Parallax doesn't want to believe. Hence it must be faked. That's the FE movement in a nutshell
P1) If personally unverifiable evidence contradicts an obvious truth then the evidence is fabricated
P2) The Flat Earth is an obvious truth
Having "Dr" before your name doesn't mean you are always right or better than someone who is "just" a blogger.Well, there's a good possibility that he was never a doctor anyway and just claimed to be because he thought it added some credibility to his ridiculous arguments.
We don't know if it's flat, or round, we simply don't know. We are all assumingSee, this is where I'm going to disagree.
The rays are curving upwards, and so the last rays may miss the observer but hit the top of the mountain.