1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: US Presidential Election 2024
« on: September 19, 2024, 11:30:29 PM »
You mean he hasn't said anything else?
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Clearly, the only solution is for the Democrats to replace Biden on the ballot shortly before the election and not allow Republicans to run a lengthy negative campaign against them.Gonna give credit for the prediction...doubt it will be helpful, but hey, you got the call.
https://www.cnn.com/2024/09/06/politics/manhattan-us-attorney-office-spokesperson-video-trump-hush-money/index.htmlYou, too, stated the cases would not have been prosecuted if Trump wasn't running for President.
Here's what happened. Crowder sent an attractive woman to hit on this dude and say to him, "Oh, isn't it awful that they're trying to prosecute poor innocent Trump? You agree with me, right?" Blaise thought with his dick and promptly assured her that of course they're in full agreement on this subject, and of course Trump is entirely innocent. That's all this is. Blaise was not blowing the whistle or revealing secret information; he was trying to get laid.
I'll maybe watch the video later but...Funny. I believe you stated once, here on this forum, these cases would have never been brought if Trump was not running for President.
Of course it's a joke. Any other person would have been tried and sentenced by now with minimal media attention but not Trump. He's making a spectical every time a normal legal process occurs. Trump did a bad thing and now he's trying to be a clown in the court to keep people from thinking it's serious.
Of course, the family invited Trump. Of course, the family allowed pictures.Most people know the dates their loved ones died. And, according to Tom, the family invited Trump. Which implies it was private. Especially given the lack of non- invited people.Was it a public ceremony or a private ceremony? Where was Trump for the first two anniversary ceremonies?So, it was an anniversary ceremony. So people did know the anniversary date. So, people knew.
Was it a public ceremony or a private ceremony? Where was Trump for the first two anniversary ceremonies?So, it was an anniversary ceremony. So people did know the anniversary date. So, people knew.
No one knows the anniversary date for the ceremony?Can you show me a public announcement for it posted prior to the date?But for some reason, he felt it was important to make his visit public...Here is a guy who cannot take a shit without the media trying to publicize it, and Dave is trying to pretend the wreath-laying ceremony at ANC was made public because of Trump.
Who the fuck you trying to zoom here, Dave? Don't you ever get tired of posting terrible shit?
But for some reason, he felt it was important to make his visit public...Here is a guy who cannot take a shit without the media trying to publicize it, and Dave is trying to pretend the wreath-laying ceremony at ANC was made public because of Trump.
https://www.newsweek.com/kamala-harris-first-interview-ratings-compared-donald-trump-1946932Everyone likes to gawk at various types of accidents, such as interstate pileups and train wrecks. People are willing to sit around for hours at events like these. Sometimes they contact others telling them to come and look.
This must be driving the orange doofus nuts. LOL
Odd that he'd make a whole video for his campaign about it if it wasn't a PR stunt. Especially since he skipped the last two years...Odd the family asked for photos and video and odd he skipped because he wasn't invited there the last two years?
deadpool & wolverine
tbh greatest movie of all time
was excellent imoWas it really that good, or can I just wait for streaming at home?
Anyone who is not a US Citizen is not entitled to the rights granted in the US Constitution.Constitutions are written for the country and its citizens.
End of argument.
Wait... Are you actually arguing that no one who isn't a US citizen is bound or protected by the constitution? Because that's a bold statement that seems to be ignored by all legal history.