It depends. Whether you want to 'count' something is not for me to decide.
I'm not asking myself the question. I'm asking you the question. I feel like you already know that. Since you like to argue semantics I'll humor you and add two words to the previous post to clear up your confusion. I'll ask basically the same question many different ways in the hopes that you might the wording of one of them worthy of an answer.
The flat disk great ice wall model without a South pole is spherical earth projection.
Does that mean that
you believe it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?
In case you don't like the wording of that question then please answer this question:
Does that mean that
you think it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?
In case you don't like the wording of that question then please answer this question:
Does that mean that
you understand it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?
In case you don't like the wording of that question then please answer this question:
Does that mean that
you know it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?
In case you don't like the wording of that question then please answer this question:
Are
you saying it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?
In case you don't like the wording of that question then please answer this question:
Are
you under the impressions that it DOES NOT COUNT as a FE model because it is based on a spherical earth projection?