I’ll admit I don’t understand all the details of the US system. I know that the electors in a state generally vote for the president who won that state. I know they don’t have to but they generally do and it would do huge damage to democracy in the US if the state votes for Biden and the electors voted for Trump (or vica versa).
Just like over here an MP can change party and I don’t think they have to call a local election when they do, but that is generally what happens.
You seem to be arguing here Tom, that a State which voted for Biden should allow electors in to vote for Trump because
1) It has happened before
2) They don’t like the result
3) You don’t like the result
Now, you might say “it’s not just that I don’t like the result, I believe that my preferred candidate has had the election stolen from him”. Well ok, let’s see your evidence.
In the meme thread you posted something basically saying “there’s loads of evidence”. And I guess you’re right. But when it comes to evidence quality is more important than quantity. Yes there are lots of affidavits but they’re trash. Not just because I say so but because judges are saying so. I think we are up to nearly 60 cases now. Only one has been won and it was nothing to do with fraud. So...yeah.
Your meme mentioned “statistical impossibilities”. Well ok, let’s see them. Because data can be interpreted in many ways and the ludicrous “one in a quadrillion” number in the Supreme Court case was based on a couple of assumptions which aren’t true. If you start with a false premise then you’re going to reach a false conclusion.
So basically all you’re left with now, having been let down over the last month by all the things you’ve got excited about, is hoping that the electoral college defies the will of the people because you don’t like the outcome of the election. And you think you’re the good guys?
