Sure, sure, the real space ship is underneath the poorly crafted space ship.
Why would a space agency hold pieces of its lunar lander together with tape?
If you can't demonstrate it, then you shouldn't believe it.
Quote from: Tom Bishop on February 10, 2017, 10:09:45 PMWhy would a space agency hold pieces of its lunar lander together with tape?Just as an FYI, NASA did not design or build the Lunar Module. Grumman Aircraft did.
The moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.
Quote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?
Quote from: Rekt on February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?
Quote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 06:20:21 PMQuote from: Rekt on February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right? FYI, your link is broken.
Quote from: TotesNotReptilian on February 14, 2017, 08:05:01 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 06:20:21 PMQuote from: Rekt on February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right? FYI, your link is broken.Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the way
Quote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 09:01:33 PMQuote from: TotesNotReptilian on February 14, 2017, 08:05:01 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 06:20:21 PMQuote from: Rekt on February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right? FYI, your link is broken.Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the wayI don't know. But there are many scattered all over the world, many of which end up in national museums. I would think that people would start to notice if they were all fake. The discovery of a single fake 40 years later isn't very compelling evidence that the entire program was faked.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_moon_rocks
Quote from: TotesNotReptilian on February 14, 2017, 09:24:12 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 09:01:33 PMQuote from: TotesNotReptilian on February 14, 2017, 08:05:01 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 06:20:21 PMQuote from: Rekt on February 14, 2017, 05:49:55 PMQuote from: TheTruthIsOnHere on February 14, 2017, 04:49:48 PMThe moon landing wasn't real. The technology didn't exist and it still doesn't exist.Any proof of this?Any proof it is? Besides the fake moon rocks that we gave people after we came back?You realize that there are many that aren't fake, right? FYI, your link is broken.Where are they housed and have they been independently verified as being authentic?I appreciate your attention to detail in fixing my broken link in your quote by the wayI don't know. But there are many scattered all over the world, many of which end up in national museums. I would think that people would start to notice if they were all fake. The discovery of a single fake 40 years later isn't very compelling evidence that the entire program was faked.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moon_rockhttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stolen_and_missing_moon_rocksWhat other tangible, physical proof do we have that human's actually set foot on the moon?
http://legacy.jefferson.kctcs.edu/observatory/apollo11/i find baysinger's recordings extremely compelling
Quote from: TotesNotReptilian on February 12, 2017, 02:12:01 PMCould you at least point us to the part that looks like it is "loosely held together"? I honestly have no idea what part you are talking about.The general answer is this: making something air tight is more time consuming, heavier, and costlier than not making it air tight. If there is no reason to make it air tight, then they aren't going to bother. Electronics don't need an airtight compartment.You are aware that when the craft landed it allegedly made large clouds of lunar dust that went everywhere. Are you telling me that NASA didn't really care about the then unknown properties of the lunar dust getting into the many gaps in the exterior hull, and onto all of the electronics?
Could you at least point us to the part that looks like it is "loosely held together"? I honestly have no idea what part you are talking about.The general answer is this: making something air tight is more time consuming, heavier, and costlier than not making it air tight. If there is no reason to make it air tight, then they aren't going to bother. Electronics don't need an airtight compartment.