Those people are authorities in their field.
ahahahahhahhhhahahaaahahahahahaha
Those [NYT] surveys, however, have attracted scrutiny from an array of pollsters either due to their lack of transparency about the sampling methodology or from oversampling Democrats.
cool, let's examine these claims.
1) lack of transparency about sampling methodology.
https://www.nytimes.com/article/times-siena-poll-methodology.htmland there's literally a section at the bottom of the poll data itself called "full methodology" that describes...well, i don't wanna give it away. but it has to do with the full methodology of the polling.
2) oversampling democrats.
![](https://i.imgur.com/P9iiTPm.png)
![](https://i.imgur.com/3vcAtOV.png)
lol i know numbers are tough for you, but notice how they didn't oversample democrats at all. by self-reporting, they spoke to an equal number. by L2 data, they spoke to
more republicans than democrats. your source simply doesn't understand the difference between weighted and unweighted values. probably because he doesn't understand nyt's methodology. lmao this is way too funny.
3) bonus claim: "Exit polls from the 2020 election may provide a benchmark for estimating the partisan affiliations of voters."
ahahahahhahhhhahahaaahahahahahaha yeah demographics never change over time, that's why we just use polling demographics from 1776 or whatever.
fam you really gotta stop taking people at their word simply because you both vote for the same party.