1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 13, 2025, 11:56:56 AM »

Dr. El-Baz is telling you that it is not a coincidence. The words that he used "the same size". The Moon and the Sun have the same diameter. How are you going to explain to anyone that out of a random set of collisions (which cannot be explained by Nasa anyway) the Moon positioned itself at just the right distance to cover the Sun in perfect symmetry?

You really don't know who Farouk El-Baz was, do you?

The entire sequence of events for the Apollo 11 mission was created by Dr. El-Baz.

“From 1967 to 1972, Dr. El-Baz participated in the Apollo Program as Supervisor of Lunar Science Planning at Bellcomm, Inc., a division of AT&T that conducted systems analysis for NASA Headquarters in Washington, D.C. During these six years, he was Secretary of the Landing Site Selection Committee for the Apollo missions to the Moon, Principal Investigator of Visual Observationsand Photography, and Chairman of the Astronaut Training Group.”

"What all of these titles amount to is that El-Baz was the guy who picked the landing sites, controlled the dissemination and analysis of all the photography, and directly managed and oversaw the astronauts’ geological training, preparing them for what they would actually observe on the lunar surface. In short—he was the most powerful single individual in the American space program."

Convince yourself that indeed the Moon does not cause the solar eclipse: the Allais effect.

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg760382#msg760382

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 13, 2025, 09:38:42 AM »

I did not claim it was the Moon (in the clip from Kiev). All of these celestial events, which are occurring very often now, are leading to the astronomical reset.

Take a look at the date inscribed on the 1$ note (or the date featured on the tablet held by the Statue of Liberty).

https://theskylive.com/planetarium?obj=jupiter&date=1776-07-04&h=17&m=22

https://theskylive.com/planetarium?obj=jupiter&date=1776-06-21&h=17&m=22

https://theskylive.com/planetarium?obj=jupiter&date=2025-06-21&h=17&m=22

https://theskylive.com/planetarium?obj=jupiter&date=2025-07-04&h=17&m=22

I am not stating that the reset will occur at the summer solstice; however, these astronomical correlations show us that we are very close to this celestial adjustment.

Remember what I was telling everyone here some three years ago: for a real pandemic you need a huge volcanic eruption, which is exactly what happened on October 12, 1918 (the largest eruption of the century, Katla). It was the dust from comet Halley (1910) which caused the influenza pandemic. When the comet is going to appear in the sky, there is bound to be some volcanic eruptions which will unleash some kind of a new epidemic.

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 13, 2025, 07:50:25 AM »

You seem to be so sure when describing the Moon, and yet one of the most important scientists who ever worked for Nasa was much more humble:

The Moon has astonishing synchronicity with the Sun. When the Sun is at its lowest and weakest in mid-winter, the Moon is at its highest and brightest, and the reverse occurs in mid-summer. Both set at the same point on the horizon at the equinoxes and at the opposite point at the solstices. What are the chances that the Moon would naturally find an orbit so perfect that it would cover the Sun at an eclipse and appear from Earth to be the same size? What are chances that the alignments would be so perfect at the equinoxes and solstices?

    Farouk El Baz,
    NASA

That person was not filming the rising/setting of the Moon. The clip features a very fast motion of the Moon, right at that point in time.

Here are more clips featuring very strange phenomena:

This was filmed in Kiev, just last night:

https://x.com/KyivOperativ/status/1899944124981399966

https://x.com/UaCoins/status/1899942206565146801

This was caught on camera in LA:

https://x.com/ZT_Followers/status/1899868898448859185

This is from Cornwall:

https://x.com/ZT_Followers/status/1897438660091326943


The very best scientists at Stanford University were very concerned about the fact that the Gizen plateau was inundated for weeks. So was Dr. Luis Alvarez (Nobel prize winner):

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2225892#msg2225892

It was not the Thera volcanic eruption. The Earth, in the heliocentrical setting, must have undergone a polar shift.

The Pentagon had sent a team of physicists to measure the changes in the position of the north magnetic pole:

https://web.archive.org/web/20190521125906/https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Kenneth%20White%20-%20World%20in%20Peril%20(extracted%20pages).pdf

Their findings? They were expecting (1946) the reversal of the magnetic poles and the polar shift of the Earth.


The mechanics of the astronomical reset, according to my research:

A comet is going start the entire reset, there are four choices; two of these comets were involved in the 1811-1812 geological reset of North and Central America. The other two are comet Halley and comet Hale-Bopp.

In 1811, on December 16, a meteor from comet 12P/Pons-Brooks struck the New Madrid fault, causing the largest earthquake ever recorded:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2419438#msg2419438

Alexander Humboldt had described the tremendous geological upheaval in Central and South America:

https://www.gutenberg.org/cache/epub/6322/pg6322-images.html (chapter 1.14)

In 1812 a series of very powerful earthquakes realigned the island of California with the north-american continent:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2169555#msg2169555 (seven consecutive messages)

Comet Encke will play a role at the end of the astronomical reset.

Then, a massive Birkeland currents wave, starting from Sgr A West (or Sgr A) will hit the Orion/Gemini constellations. In the past, this kind of event caused the Crab Nebula supernova.

The most powerful hipernova had occurred in the Geminorum area, the so-called Rudra event which had been described in Vedic mythology. Rudra is the Betelgeuse star, and at the same time is planet Mars.

The reversal of the magnetic poles will take place, accompanied by the rotation of the entire stellar dome, the North Star will not be Polaris anymore.

At the same time, the Sun will start to orbit beyond the Tropic, in order to reach the other side of the dome, where it will rise from west to east (or north to south).


Here is one of the greatest scientists at Nasa, Dr. Norman Bergrun, who wrote a book saying that the rings of Saturn are being created continuously by giant UFOs:

https://archive.org/details/ringmakers-of-saturn/page/3/mode/1up

"Bergrun is a distinguished former NASA research engineer who has made major innovative contributions to multiple U.S. aeronautic, missile and rocket programs.

He has also won many top science and engineering awards, including the California Society of Professional Engineers Archimedes Engineering Achievement Award."

4

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 12, 2025, 08:35:08 PM »

Take a look at the comments, there were other eyewitnesses who were watching the Moon moving faster than usual.

https://sacred-texts.com/bib/boe/boe083.htm

And the moon shall alter her order,
And not appear at her time.
And in those days the sun shall be seen and he shall journey in the evening †on the extremity of the great chariot† in the west
And shall shine more brightly than accords with the order of light.

And many chiefs of the stars shall transgress the order (prescribed).
And these shall alter their orbits and tasks,
And not appear at the seasons prescribed to them.

All of these things are going to happen once the Sun will start to orbit beyond the Tropic (astronomical reset).  The reset will start in the Orion and Gemini constellations area.

5

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 11, 2025, 11:35:37 AM »

(Innuit solar observations from years ago)

NASA can't explain why the Gizeh pyramid was covered in water up to an elevation of 100 meters in recent historical Times.

NASA cannot explain the faint young sun paradox.

No one can explain the movement of the Moon in that clip.

A 30 degree shift in the Sun's position is explained only within the bounds of FET.

We are approaching the astronomical reset, where soon the Sun will rise from the West and then set in the East.

6

Flat Earth Theory / Is Earth rotating faster?

« on: March 11, 2025, 09:21:48 AM »

This clip was filmed yesterday in England:

https://www.tiktok.com/@j4y_k4y_74/video/7479898573694389526

From the comments:

Romoni – Intuitive Heart: Yes, I confirm from London – it was really fast today. And visible at 12 o'clock!

OnSeagullwings: I didn't look at the moon, but I was staring at Orion the other day. It was flying   straight and steady over the horizon, from south to north, for an hour like an airplane. Strange. Maybe the Earth's rotation speed was disrupted?

Mel: This isn't the first time I've encountered this. I first noticed it back in 2015.

Ricardo Vincent: I didn't look at the speed, but yesterday in the UK the moon was visible all day. What's that like?

dugstar39: The last 5 days in Manchester the sun and moon have been visible all day. It's quite strange, but as a resident of the Commonwealth of Nations I wonder what they see in Australia at this time of year. Have we left them without a moon?


Here is an observation made by a RE scientist in New Mexico (where he lives):

"Local residents informed me that the position of the Sun had recently moved - strangely and dramatically - westward. By my rough estimate, the Sun’s position about an hour after dawn (aka the Earth’s tilt) had been displaced by nearly 30 degrees (along the 360 degrees Earth spin). That measure is quite easily taken although wearing safety sunglasses is recommended. Stretch both arms, hands side by side, on the left side of the Sun, and then move your right hand to the other side of the left. That’s roughly 36 degrees to the east, where the Sun used to be. However, that simple measure no longer applies, due to a very strange shift of the Sun’s trajectory over this past month.

However, over the past week prior to this deadline, the Sun suddenly returned - flipped back - to its former position! That indicates a major down-shift of the Sun and its wobble along the pole (and any related electromagnetic forces along the Earth’s central core) back to its original position. Whether that is a welcome revival of the Sun’s original axis of spin or merely a temporary jog, a momentary repositioning of the Earth’s core, has yet to be determined.

I witness this rather disturbing shift of Earth orbit every day, while walking the dog or driving in southern New Mexico. The sunrise and the Moon’s orbital path are both off-center from their previous trajectories. If you hold up your raised hands to the sky, the morning Sun has shifted westward by three hand-widths or approximately 30 degrees (in an Earth circle of 360 degrees)."

7

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: March 11, 2025, 09:12:09 AM »

No one cares about miliarcseconds (per year).

Here we are noticing at least a full 60 degrees rotation.

Not even a 46 degree observation could be explained by mainstream science.

Here are more details offered by the author of the video in glp:

https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message5920291/pg1

8

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: February 01, 2025, 08:19:30 PM »

You are done here.

Here are the images that you have posted just a while ago:

https://i.imgur.com/Yzq2Tbo.jpeg
https://i.imgur.com/Yzq2Tbo.jpeg

The next dark feature (right next to the dark element pinpointed with the pink dot) located to the right of the dark element (as we view the image) DISAPPEARS COMPLETELY IN THE VIDEO:

https://x.com/astroferg/status/1880672505326960964?t=8zcwcKVpYxfrRVyo7XU8yA&s=19

While it still can be seen in your image:

https://i.imgur.com/Yzq2Tbo.jpeg

Please explain to your readers why there is at a least a 60 degree rotation of Mars in three hours of time.

9

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: February 01, 2025, 07:22:29 PM »

Your tricks don't work with me.

Here is the video:

https://x.com/astroferg/status/1880672505326960964?t=8zcwcKVpYxfrRVyo7XU8yA&s=19

Look how much further that dark feature on the clouds of Mars is rotating BEYOND the spot on the image you have posted. You are missing at least 10-15 degrees right there.

In fact, your previous analysis will create more FE believers.

There are at least 60 degrees right there, perhaps even more, maybe 70 degrees or so.

I win.

10

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: February 01, 2025, 04:46:44 PM »

If I had to guess, I'd say it looks just slightly past 45deg. I could be underestimating and it could be closer to 60

The rotation is a bit quicker than I'd expect but maybe there's something we're not taking in to account.

The angle featured in the video on the rotation of Mars is at least 60 degrees, where even 46 degrees could not be explained at all.

What is the connection between Mars and planet Vulcan? Mars (Marduk) had fought with Pairika (Mus Parik) before, according to the astronomical observations made long ago.

The fact that now we can see Garuda (Vulcan/Pairika) in broad daylight in the sky means that there is something affecting the entire planetary system, and that something is referring to the first effects of the galactic wave (cosmic rays) which is beginning to manifest itself (just like in the past, that is why I did include those references to the Crab nebula).

Nothing else can explain the acceleration of the rotation of Mars.


ASTRONOMICAL OBSERVATIONS OF PLANET GARUDA

Le Verrier, 1859:

https://armaghplanet.com/vulcan-the-solar-systems-ghost-planet.html

Lescarbault, 1959

Russell, 1860

(1876). An Intra-Mercurial Planet. Nature, 14(362):505

Covington, 1860

Lummis, 1862

Coumbary, 1865

Swift and Watson, 1878:

https://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu/cgi-bin/nph-iarticle_query?1953ASPL....6..291E&defaultprint=YES&filetype=.pdf

In fact, Swift and Watson (two oustanding American observational astronomers) had declared that they had seen TWO intra-mercurial planets (that's Garuda and its main satellite).

Then, after 1882, there were no more astronomical observations.

In a paper published just three days ago, Michael Lund of CalTech proposes that Garuda (Vulcan) had changed its orbit following the interaction with the great comet of 1882 and also comet Wells (1882):

https://arxiv.org/pdf/2403.20281.pdf

"Simply put, Vulcan is no longer on the orbit that it was as of the middle of the 19th century, but is on an inclined orbit that would have placed it close to the sun, but outside of the narrow band alignedwith the sun’s equator that Campbell (1909) focused on."

"The first possibility, and the more straight forward one, is that Vulcan underwent a close gravitational interaction that significantly changed its orbit somewhere between
roughly 1880 and 1900."

"This provides the alternative possibility that through the von Zeipel-Lidov-Kozai mechanism, Mercury was able to significantly excite the orbital inclination of Vulcan, resulting in Vulcan rarely being in line with the sun’s equator and outside the region that intramercurial planet searches had deliberately targeted."

He also notes that Einstein did not explain "the observations that had been made of Vulcan".

In fact, Le Verrier's original calculations stand correct, since the equations provided by GTR cannot be used to analyze dynamical systems:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2194405#msg2194405

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg769750#msg769750

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2194825#msg2194825

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg2196454#msg2196454

Then, starting about 2003, Garuda became active again and numerous photographs and videos were published depicting the FireBird next to the Sun.

Ancient astronomical text: Muspar (a fiery comet that loiters around the sun).


Definitely the acceleration of the rotation of Mars is related to the direct astronomical observations of planet Vulcan.

11

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: February 01, 2025, 10:11:24 AM »

The rotation is a bit quicker than I'd expect but maybe there's something we're not taking in to account.

This is what it is not being taken into account:

https://zetatalk.com/index/sign1083.jpg

https://zetatalk.com/newsletr/issue737.jpg
The 3:18 image captured the Winged Disc, the prior and later images did not have this rare capture. Per Skymap, only the planet Mercury should be in the four o'clock position on that day, to the right of the Sun.

Garuda, video and image:

https://twitter.com/Mixmasterxl/status/1770541769635033444

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GJngMN3XgAAfQFr?format=jpg&name=medium






In the video there are at least 60 degrees of rotation, the figure might be even higher than that. Even if the angle of rotation would be, let's say, 48 degrees, the phenomenon could not be accounted for (official data: The Martian rotation is increasing by 4 milliarcseconds per year squared. That means the Martian day is shortening by a fraction of a millisecond per year).


The supernova remnant of the Sagittarius A event is the Crab nebula.

The possibility that high-intensity cosmic ray electron fronts could
travel out through the Galaxy from a source at the Galaxy’s center is a new
idea that was inspired by the zodiac’s galactic explosion message.
Consequently, astronomers had not previously seriously considered the
notion that the cosmic ray electrons trapped in these remnants might have
come from interstellar space. They presumed that the cosmic rays are
spread relatively uniformly throughout the Galaxy and have an intensity
about as low as levels currently observed in the vicinity of the solar system.
Of course, such intensities would be far too low to produce the large
quantities of synchrotron radio wave emission seen to come from these
remnants. As an alternative, astronomers speculated that the cosmic rays
producing this emission might have come from the original supernova
explosion. However, this theory failed to account for the radio wave output
from some of the more luminous remnants, such as Cassiopeia A and the
Crab Nebula.

In the case of the Crab Nebula, astronomers have
suggested that the electrons are being supplied by the Crab pulsar, a
pulsating neutron star located near the nebula’s center, or at least along our
line of sight to its center.

However, the cosmic rays producing the radiation seen to come directly
from the pulsar may not necessarily be the only ones energizing the Crab
Nebula. This much may be gathered by comparing the pulsar’s radiation
spectrum to that of the nebula (see figure 10.7). Whereas both spectra have
the same slope in the X-ray frequency region, their radiation intensities
(flux densities) both decreasing with increasing frequency in a similar
fashion, the slopes of the two spectra differ substantially in the radio and
optical spectral regions. Most of the Crab Nebula’s X-ray emission comes
from a localized region lying within half a light-year of the pulsar; hence,
much of it may be powered by the pulsar’s cosmic ray wind.

Interestingly, the radio map of Cassiopeia A presented in figure 10.8 shows the
remnant to be most luminous on its westward side (right side), which faces
the Galactic center and would be receiving the full brunt of the superwave
onslaught. Furthermore, the remnant is seen to be least luminous on its
eastern side (left side), which is in the lee of this cosmic ray wind. A
similarly skewed distribution in brightness is apparent in X-ray images of
Cas A, such as the one shown in figure 10.9.

12

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 31, 2025, 09:45:32 AM »

https://web.archive.org/web/20180512121552/https://www.ucl.ac.uk/mathematical-physical-sciences/images/news/Saturn_3D_final6.jpg

Plasma Flux Transfer Events between Saturn and the Sun

A twisted magnetic field structure, previously never seen before at Saturn, has now been detected for the first time ... When the Sun’s magnetic field interacts with the Earth’s magnetic field (the magnetosphere), a complex process occurs called magnetic reconnection which can twist the field into a helical shape. These twisted helically structured magnetic fields are called flux ropes or “flux transfer events” (FTEs) and are observed at Earth and even more commonly at Mercury ...

It is this kind of flux ropes which are the cause of the modification of the rotational speed of Mars. In my opinion it is the start of the reversal of the galactic magnetic field:

https://lweb.cfa.harvard.edu/~reid/bfield.html

This reversal will start in Sagittarius A, and it will affect the silver galactic center (Orion/Gemini):

https://www.e-education.psu.edu/astro801/content/l8_p7.html

https://ascensionglossary.com/images/1/19/Gate_of_Gods144.jpg?20141213053744

13

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 31, 2025, 06:51:25 AM »

We don't care about the martian "sol", that's RET. In FET, the Earth îs stationary while Mars rotates with respect to the Earth.

14

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 10:00:16 PM »

The Martian rotation is increasing by 4 milliarcseconds per year squared. That means the Martian day is shortening by a fraction of a millisecond per year.

60 degrees in 3 hours = 480 degrees in 24 hours, a gain of 33% in the rotational speed.

Of course, in FET it is the layers of clouds which are rotating, not the planet itself.

15

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 06:59:27 PM »

The area around the north pole in the video.

16

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 06:39:25 PM »

If we watch the rotation of the NP, it looks like some 90 degrees. Of course, more observations from amateur astronomers are needed.

17

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 05:48:06 PM »

https://x.com/astroferg/status/1880672505326960964?t=8zcwcKVpYxfrRVyo7XU8yA&s=19

18

Flat Earth Theory / Is Mars rotating faster?

« on: January 30, 2025, 05:37:06 PM »

The footage included was shot over 3 hours using an 11-inch Celestron NexStar GPS telescope and a Blackmagic Pocket Cinema camera.

In those three hours, Mars has rotated by almost 90 degrees. If Mars rotates a quarter of a circle in 3 hours, then it makes a full rotation in 12 hours. However, the official full rotation time is ~24 hours and 30 minutes.

On GLP there is a discussion on this topic, but they are not aware of the discrepancy of the rotation time in the video.

Either the author of the video filmed for six hours (the video is for visual effects, and has little to do with astrophysics) or something else is going on.

19

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Solar Eclipse of Aug 12, 2026

« on: January 25, 2025, 01:08:36 PM »

How did you figure that out? Did you consult your tarot cards?

https://www.getyourfree.info/WIP-ch30.pdf

Chapters 27-30:

https://web.archive.org/web/20250000000000*/https://avalonlibrary.net/ebooks/Kenneth%20White%20-%20World%20in%20Peril%20(extracted%20pages).pdf

20

Flat Earth Investigations / Re: Solar Eclipse of Aug 12, 2026

« on: January 25, 2025, 10:05:49 AM »

There are several screengrabs in this thread, all dealing with the August 12, 2026 total solar ecilpse. What I am stating is this: if the Sun will go beyond one of the Tropics before that date (8/12/26) the times listed for the solar/lunar eclipses for the 21st century will have to be modified greatly (they may not even occur at all after the astronomical reset).