Quote from: Lord Dave on January 13, 2017, 07:17:07 PMhttps://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/819516602764791808http://gizmodo.com/rudy-giuliani-is-forming-a-cybersecurity-team-for-trump-1791109633http://gizmodo.com/the-website-of-donald-trumps-top-cyber-security-advisor-1791145791The security company's website is currently down. From what I've read the story is a bit misleading. It's allegedly more of a consolation for Giuliani since Trump didn't want him as a cabinet pick.Also, at least as of earlier this morning, whoever runs DNS for that site's domain removed the A record and it was still accessible via IP. Not sure what they hoped to accomplish, but if they were going to try security through obscurity then that is quite laughable.
https://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/819516602764791808http://gizmodo.com/rudy-giuliani-is-forming-a-cybersecurity-team-for-trump-1791109633http://gizmodo.com/the-website-of-donald-trumps-top-cyber-security-advisor-1791145791The security company's website is currently down.
If you are going to DebOOonK an expert then you have to at least provide a source with credentials of equal or greater relevance. Even then, it merely shows that some experts disagree with each other.
If we are not speculating then we must assume
Quote from: junker on January 13, 2017, 08:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Dave on January 13, 2017, 07:17:07 PMhttps://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/819516602764791808http://gizmodo.com/rudy-giuliani-is-forming-a-cybersecurity-team-for-trump-1791109633http://gizmodo.com/the-website-of-donald-trumps-top-cyber-security-advisor-1791145791The security company's website is currently down. From what I've read the story is a bit misleading. It's allegedly more of a consolation for Giuliani since Trump didn't want him as a cabinet pick.Also, at least as of earlier this morning, whoever runs DNS for that site's domain removed the A record and it was still accessible via IP. Not sure what they hoped to accomplish, but if they were going to try security through obscurity then that is quite laughable.Still, it's obvious Trump is giving positions of power or government money to people who helped him in his campaign. I mean, he appointed Ben Carson to Housing and Development. There are people far better qualified for that post yet Trump picked someone who dropped out and supported him.Coincidence?Probably as much as this:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/business/media/cspan-russia-today.html?_r=0
In other news, Occupy Democrats support Democrats and not Republicans; are hypocritical.
Quote from: Lord Dave on January 14, 2017, 08:15:29 PMQuote from: junker on January 13, 2017, 08:56:44 PMQuote from: Lord Dave on January 13, 2017, 07:17:07 PMhttps://twitter.com/foxandfriends/status/819516602764791808http://gizmodo.com/rudy-giuliani-is-forming-a-cybersecurity-team-for-trump-1791109633http://gizmodo.com/the-website-of-donald-trumps-top-cyber-security-advisor-1791145791The security company's website is currently down. From what I've read the story is a bit misleading. It's allegedly more of a consolation for Giuliani since Trump didn't want him as a cabinet pick.Also, at least as of earlier this morning, whoever runs DNS for that site's domain removed the A record and it was still accessible via IP. Not sure what they hoped to accomplish, but if they were going to try security through obscurity then that is quite laughable.Still, it's obvious Trump is giving positions of power or government money to people who helped him in his campaign. I mean, he appointed Ben Carson to Housing and Development. There are people far better qualified for that post yet Trump picked someone who dropped out and supported him.Coincidence?Probably as much as this:https://www.nytimes.com/2017/01/12/business/media/cspan-russia-today.html?_r=0You make it sound like favoritism is not common in cabinet appointments.
Memes aside, we're in for a shit show aren't we? I just wish the anti-establishment candidate could have been someone less narcissistic.
Memes aside, we're in for a shit show aren't we?
http://deadstate.org/i-no-longer-have-to-be-politically-correct-gop-politician-arrested-after-grabbing-a-woman-in-her-genital-area/wow looky golly gee it's almost like words have real-life impacts no matter how much you excuse them as being joking/non-seriousTrump is making creeps and bigots feel like it's okay to act on their creepiness and bigotry in public now. I mean, I guess that's not really news at this point, but it's still frustrating and disappointing as fuck.
Grabbing someone by the pussy without consent is not "politically incorrect", it is sexual assault. To use political correctness to justify your criminal behavior is pathetic.
Quote from: Rama Set on January 16, 2017, 08:51:10 PMGrabbing someone by the pussy without consent is not "politically incorrect", it is sexual assault. To use political correctness to justify your criminal behavior is pathetic.Depends on who you ask.To some, politically correct means having to restrain your words and actions to keep from offending/assaulting others who disagree with you.
I still don't see how that would classify as political incorrect. It's against the law, it doesn't matter if you agree/disagree.
Quote from: Lord Dave on January 16, 2017, 09:18:40 PMQuote from: Rama Set on January 16, 2017, 08:51:10 PMGrabbing someone by the pussy without consent is not "politically incorrect", it is sexual assault. To use political correctness to justify your criminal behavior is pathetic.Depends on who you ask.To some, politically correct means having to restrain your words and actions to keep from offending/assaulting others who disagree with you.Offending sure. Assault is illegal. Restraining yourself from assaulting people is being civil, not politically correct.
You CAN grab them by the pussy and a near majority of people in America will support you.
when you try to mock anyone while also running the flat earth society. Lol
wow looky golly gee it's almost like words have real-life impacts no matter how much you excuse them as being joking/non-serious
Fake news story aside (the article heavily messes with the chronology and causality of events compared to the actual allegations made against the guy)
In December of 2016, Keyserling engaged in a “political argument” with a woman and allegedly declared, “I love this new world. I no longer have to be politically correct.”
She told him that if he was "proud of that I can't help you," after which he called her a lazy, bloodsucking union employee, the warrant said.She uttered "(expletive deleted) you" and walked into her office, the warrant said. She said he followed her into the office and said he wanted to talk with her co-worker, the warrant said.When that co-worker walked in, she said she didn't have time to speak with him and left the office, the warrant said. The 57-year-old woman decided to leave with her co-worker because she didn't want to be alone with him, the warrant said.
As the woman turned to walk away, Keyserling reportedly reach from behind and placed his hand between her legs and pinched on or near her genital area.
Greenwich Representative Town Meeting board member Christopher von Keyserling was charged with fourth-degree sexual assault and was released on $2,500 bond. He’s due to appear in court on January 25.
Police said video footage from a surveillance camera on the day of the incident is consistent with the sequence of events described by the complainant.
Quote from: Lord Dave on January 16, 2017, 07:21:43 PMYou CAN grab them by the pussy and a near majority of people in America will support you.What makes you say that?