How does an constant upward acceleration cause a rotation in storm systems? (ignoring the fact that there is no mechanism for this constant acceleration)
And why would the effect be clockwise on one side of the equator and counterclockwise on the other side?
If I were a believer in FET, the weirdest thing would be how amazingly well the "laws of physics" match the idea of a round earth.
Sun, moon, planets and stars move in ways which are a PERFECT match for how large bodies orbiting a star would move. Forces like Coriolis (which have no apparent cause in FET) precisely mimic the pseudo-force that would be present on a spherical planet (and which have been observed on Jupiter and Saturn through earthly telescopes by the way).
The way that airline flights reach their destinations on time - despite the airlines having the distances they fly and the speeds they move be so crazily off-kilter for a flat earth - yet they are a perfect match for a Round Earth.
Sure - you can come up with increasingly bizarre (and ultimately untenable) ad-hoc principles that allow you to say that the world is flat - but those piles of completely unknown causes get harder and harder to defend, the more you look carefully into them.
In RET, everything works beautifully and simply using one very simple equation for gravity.
The motion of the heavens, of objects on Earth - the coriolis force, the variation of gravity over the surface, airline flight times - EVERYTHING works out without complications or contradictions from that one very simple equation.
F = m1 x m2 x G / ( r1 x r2 )
...this equation is the only one you need to deduce all of those other things in RET.
FET is a rat's nest of botches and fixes and kludges - and the laws of physics aren't like that. They are simple, beautiful, elegant.