Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Алёна

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3  Next >
21
So you met Parisfal irl?
She's actually also Parsifal, silly.

I suspect Pete is actually not an alt of Parsifal as Pete happens to beat her meat everyday.
Or maybe finger but I'm not sure.

22
Rushy himself isn't real, therefore it isn't possible to "meet him irl". There's absolutely zero evidence that Rushy exists in any way.

okay but i met him irl literally almost a year ago to the day

So you met Parisfal irl?

23
Rushy is correct.

We know that past did exist and that the future will exist, but our understanding of the universe says that only the now exists.  Everything else is just evidence of change left in the now.  Like photos or writing or memory.  All of it only exists now.

Not necessarily. Have you heard of the time loaf theory? https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/slicing-the-spacetime-loaf.248893/ (Yes I know a forum isn't exactly a credible source, but they hit a lot of key points and aren't talking in science jargon. I can grab a more credible source if you request I though.)

It doesn't change anything.  Time dialation does not alter space or create space.  Things just go slower or faster, depending on your frame of reference.
Your 'now' is still the same, just moves slower.  And doesn't require the universe to exist in the past or future.

Since some people don't know what time dilation is, I'll explain it in a simple way.
As things go faster, time moves slower for them.
That's the short simple version.

24
Time itself isn't real, therefore it isn't possible to  "travel through time". There's absolutely zero evidence that the past or future exists in any way.

Rushy himself isn't real, therefore it isn't possible to "meet him irl". There's absolutely zero evidence that Rushy exists in any way.

This is true but not relevant to my original point.

AHA! ADMIT YOU'RE AN ALT OF PARSIFAL!

25
Time itself isn't real, therefore it isn't possible to  "travel through time". There's absolutely zero evidence that the past or future exists in any way.

Rushy himself isn't real, therefore it isn't possible to "meet him irl". There's absolutely zero evidence that Rushy exists in any way.

26
3. You can't change anything in the past so why the hell would you bother?

To bear witness to historic events?
To play winning lottery numbers?  Pick up some soon to be extremely rare collectables really cheap?

Both of which alter history by having you there.  Unless you were there originally.

An interesting conundrum.  If I go back to late '09 and drop $10K on bitcoin and hold onto it taking 10 million bitcoin out of circulation so to speak, does bitcoin reach $60K or have I altered its value.
Odds are... They'd be locked in a wallet with no way to get access to it.  Or stolen.  Lost to you forever because you didn't maintian it.

I agree with Dave. Chances are, you lost your shit.

27
Time travel in the past, if it were possible, would kill you.

1. The Earth is constantly moving in the universe, not only around the sun but through space.  So the position of something on Earth say... an hour ago, isn't the same spot in space.  You'd end up appearing in the vaccume of space.
2. If you could anchor yourself so #1 doesn't matter, you'll materialize in a space with matter.  And two atoms can't coexist in the same space so at best, you'd have air bubbles form inside your body and you'd die.  AT worse, you'd fuse your atoms with the surrounding matirial and undergo nuclear fusion.
3. You can't change anything in the past so why the hell would you bother?

Let's alter history so Hitler is a gay jewish porn star.
After all, he hated everyone that wasn't straight, German, and pretty much anything not related to German's.
And... how would you do that?

Make his mother have sex with a Jewish man. Make homosexuality loom a lot in his life. And force him into movies.

28
Time travel in the past, if it were possible, would kill you.

1. The Earth is constantly moving in the universe, not only around the sun but through space.  So the position of something on Earth say... an hour ago, isn't the same spot in space.  You'd end up appearing in the vaccume of space.
2. If you could anchor yourself so #1 doesn't matter, you'll materialize in a space with matter.  And two atoms can't coexist in the same space so at best, you'd have air bubbles form inside your body and you'd die.  AT worse, you'd fuse your atoms with the surrounding matirial and undergo nuclear fusion.
3. You can't change anything in the past so why the hell would you bother?

Let's alter history so Hitler is a gay jewish porn star.
After all, he hated everyone that wasn't straight, German, and pretty much anything not related to German's.

29
(I posted this on the other site and decided to copy and paste it here for the same reasons but I edited it and added more detail)
According to Einstein's theory of General relativity. As something speeds up, time slows down.
This, in fact, can lead to time travel into the future if you travel at almost the speed of light but you can't travel exactly at the speed of light or time would stop completely, plus, it would take more energy than avalibile in the universe, as Einstein observed.
Time travel into the past, however, is more difficult as in order for time travel into the past, the time machine must exist.
You can only travel back in time to where the time machine existed as without the time machine you may simply disappear.
If you travel back into time the time machine would disappear and you would be stuck even if you did manage to travel to whatever time it is.
So therefore, time travel into the future is as simple as going near the speed of light.
A theory says that black holes might allow you to time travel into the past if you could use a machine to open the blackhole for long enough.
The end you would come out of would be what's known as a "whitehole" (it pushs things out unlike blackholes which suck things in)
It says that if you did make it out then you might be able to go back in time to a random time.
However, testing this theory would be impossible for many reasons, but not limited to:
Death
The nearest black hole is light years away
There is no such machine that can do such things


THIS IS A SERIOUS POST ABOUT MY RESEARCH ON TIME TRAVEL

30
Hey, Tom bishop.
Lets bomb cities and schools in the US to protect us. It's because we need to protect ourselves and bomb innocent children for fun.

C'mon, Tom. Tell me what you think about Russia bombing innocent people.

31
Hey, Tom bishop.
Lets bomb cities and schools in the US to protect us. It's because we need to protect ourselves and bomb innocent children for fun.

32
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« on: October 14, 2022, 07:45:51 PM »
Closest thing I found, Rushy.

33
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« on: October 14, 2022, 07:09:13 PM »
"We wanted to scare the soviets out of advancing further into Europe."
Actually, when they heard that Ronald Reagan was shot, they started advancing from Ukraine to try and takeover west Europe.
They only retreated when they heard Ronald was alive.

34
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« on: October 14, 2022, 06:35:29 PM »
I never claimed that they don't happen.

Me neither, I never claimed anything in fact.
All I'm saying is what I know about atom bombs, nukes, and hydrogen bombs.

35
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« on: October 14, 2022, 06:16:04 PM »

I think that the reason why evil governments do not use nuclear weapons is the same reason for which they do not use "at least one crate of TNT".

I'd imagine most conventional weapons used in warfare are equivalent to one or more crates of TNT.


Whatever weapons were used in the video that Stack posted (or anywhere where we've seen a huge mushroom cloud forming) were obviously very destructive, but we do not see them being used in modern conflicts.
 
You said that it was TNT so I assume (correct me if I am wrong) that you accept that the videos of mushroom clouds are real. You just don't believe that they were caused by nuclear weapons.

They were caused by some kind of weapon, though, which should still be available to governments. For whatever reason, it is clear that governments are not willing to resort to the use of such destructive force as otherwise they would already have done so.

My point is that the fact that nuclear weapons are not used today is not proof that they do not exist unless you also do not accept that the videos of the mushroom clouds are real.

Nukes are used underground for mining operations. Although aerial use of them above ground is rarely used anymore.
That doesn't mean that above ground nukes DON'T happen.

36
Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nuclear Bombs Do Not Exist
« on: October 10, 2022, 09:26:26 PM »
Before:

After:

37
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The Islamic veil debate.
« on: October 07, 2022, 07:53:09 PM »
"Mohammad is the messenger of God"
And he's telling you to shut the fuck up.

38
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The Islamic veil debate.
« on: October 07, 2022, 07:44:31 PM »

Hamza told a male audience in Sydney: 'Amazing, how can a person rape his wife?'

He added that wives must immediately respond to their husbands' sexual demands.


That comes from verse 2:223, "Yusuf Ali: Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will".

Consent not required per Allah.

So men can legally rape women?
Fuck Islam, fuck religions, and fuck you.

I'm with you on 2 out of 3, but what's your problem with me? Do you think I'm endorsing marital rape?

For a sec I thought you were spreading terrorism on this forum like a guy on the other forum.
Sorry about that.
STOP PROMOTING TERRORISM.

I'm not promoting it. I'm showing where Muslims get this crap from so you'll be informed.

I'm saying that to people who are promoting it.
I gotta say that they saw what Mohammad (piss be upon him) was doing with little girls and thought "hey, we should legalize child rape and pedophilia".


39
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The Islamic veil debate.
« on: October 07, 2022, 07:41:49 PM »

Hamza told a male audience in Sydney: 'Amazing, how can a person rape his wife?'

He added that wives must immediately respond to their husbands' sexual demands.


That comes from verse 2:223, "Yusuf Ali: Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will".

Consent not required per Allah.

So men can legally rape women?
Fuck Islam, fuck religions, and fuck you.

I'm with you on 2 out of 3, but what's your problem with me? Do you think I'm endorsing marital rape?

For a sec I thought you were spreading terrorism on this forum like a guy on the other forum.
Sorry about that.
STOP PROMOTING TERRORISM.

40
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: The Islamic veil debate.
« on: October 07, 2022, 07:35:34 PM »

Hamza told a male audience in Sydney: 'Amazing, how can a person rape his wife?'

He added that wives must immediately respond to their husbands' sexual demands.


That comes from verse 2:223, "Yusuf Ali: Your wives are as a tilth unto you; so approach your tilth when or how ye will".

Consent not required per Allah.

So men can legally rape women?
Fuck Islam, fuck religions, and fuck you.

Pages: < Back  1 [2] 3  Next >