Offline spank86

  • *
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #40 on: December 19, 2013, 07:28:53 PM »
Saddam has a good point.

He has a point.

I'm not sure it's a good one.

*

Offline Excelsior John

  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Excelsior! Flat Earth FTW!
    • View Profile
    • Excelsior! Flat Earth
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #41 on: December 20, 2013, 01:23:59 AM »
Prove her maried 8
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Henry_VIII_of_England

list of spouses on the right.

6.
Wikipedia is not a trustworthey sorce

http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/261947/Henry-VIII


wikipedia is not so much a source as a collection of sources, you merely have to lick the little numbers and find where it's information comes from to determine it's validity.
The fact that you picked Wikipedia as a sorce takes away any credibilitey you have. Thus all sorces tis null and void

I picked Wikipedia because it is quick, easy and agrees with the encyclopedia I have on my shelf. I was unaware that the Encyclopedia Britannica now made articles available free online.

You can argue that the encyclopedia Britannica is wrong if you like but I'd still like the names of the 8 wives from you.
Well maybe you shouldntve picked it in the first place
Stop. responding. to. EJ.
Stay. out. of. the. conversation!
Stop. responding. to. EJ.
Why?
I'm not trying to make you respond to him so why are you bothered about what I do?
Exacley. Now heres something me and spank can agree on
He's a troll and he'll go away quicker if people ignore him.
Ugh just be quiet ghost all because I have difrent views from you doesnt mean im a troll ::)
He's a troll and he'll go away quicker if people ignore him.

I like trolls.

My parents never let me have a dog.
Good for you. To bad im not a troll tho :)
Stop. responding. to. EJ.
Why?
I'm not trying to make you respond to him so why are you bothered about what I do?

Because we're in the serious forums, and EJ's flailing about for attention invariably ruins any genuine discussion that could have been had.  If you want to play with the trolls, do it in the basement.
Im not flaling about for atention im just puting out my views and debating with people. If you dont like — TO FLIPPIN BAD !
Saddam has a good point.
No he doesnt
Saddam has a good point.

He has a point.

I'm not sure it's a good one.
Ikr
Viva la FES!
Quote from: Yaakov ben Avraham link=https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=59968.msg1544396#msg1544396
Excelsior:...You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person.

Offline spank86

  • *
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #42 on: December 20, 2013, 01:38:02 AM »
Well maybe you shouldntve picked it in the first place


why not?

I cant find any references to the contrary and there have been numerous studies on Wikipedia which have found it to be equally reliable as any other encyclopedia such as Britannica and Encarta, in some cases MORE accurate if you don't include current affairs.

http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html

so all in all it could be considered an excellent reference point for facts on Henry VIII
« Last Edit: December 20, 2013, 01:41:54 AM by spank86 »

*

Offline Excelsior John

  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Excelsior! Flat Earth FTW!
    • View Profile
    • Excelsior! Flat Earth
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #43 on: December 20, 2013, 01:40:46 AM »
Well maybe you shouldntve picked it in the first place


why not?

I cant find any references to the contrary and there have been numerous studies on Wikipedia which have found it to be equally reliable as any other encyclopedia such as Britannica and Encarta, in some cases MORE accurate if you don't include current affairs.



so all in all it could be considered an excellent reference point for facts on Henry VIII
Prove it
Viva la FES!
Quote from: Yaakov ben Avraham link=https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=59968.msg1544396#msg1544396
Excelsior:...You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person.

Offline spank86

  • *
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #44 on: December 20, 2013, 01:41:36 AM »
Well maybe you shouldntve picked it in the first place


why not?

I cant find any references to the contrary and there have been numerous studies on Wikipedia which have found it to be equally reliable as any other encyclopedia such as Britannica and Encarta, in some cases MORE accurate if you don't include current affairs.

http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html

so all in all it could be considered an excellent reference point for facts on Henry VIII
Prove it

sorry, I accidently put the proof in img tags, not url.

http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html

edited my last post to fix.

*

Offline Excelsior John

  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Excelsior! Flat Earth FTW!
    • View Profile
    • Excelsior! Flat Earth
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #45 on: December 21, 2013, 12:07:24 AM »
Well maybe you shouldntve picked it in the first place


why not?

I cant find any references to the contrary and there have been numerous studies on Wikipedia which have found it to be equally reliable as any other encyclopedia such as Britannica and Encarta, in some cases MORE accurate if you don't include current affairs.

http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html

so all in all it could be considered an excellent reference point for facts on Henry VIII
Prove it

sorry, I accidently put the proof in img tags, not url.

http://www.livescience.com/32950-how-accurate-is-wikipedia.html

edited my last post to fix.
Anyone can just go and change it wich just shows that it is genareley wrong
Viva la FES!
Quote from: Yaakov ben Avraham link=https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=59968.msg1544396#msg1544396
Excelsior:...You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person.

Offline spank86

  • *
  • Posts: 252
    • View Profile
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #46 on: December 21, 2013, 12:42:44 AM »
Anyone can just go and change it wich just shows that it is genareley wrong

Simply not true.

There are procedures in place to prevent tampering.

I have yet to hear of a name for Henry's 7th or 8th wife from you.

Or indeed any sources despite me having produced many for you.

*

Offline Excelsior John

  • *
  • Posts: 730
  • Excelsior! Flat Earth FTW!
    • View Profile
    • Excelsior! Flat Earth
Re: King Henry VIII.
« Reply #47 on: December 21, 2013, 04:00:58 PM »
Anyone can just go and change it wich just shows that it is genareley wrong

Simply not true.

There are procedures in place to prevent tampering.

I have yet to hear of a name for Henry's 7th or 8th wife from you.

Or indeed any sources despite me having produced many for you.
Prove it
Viva la FES!
Quote from: Yaakov ben Avraham link=https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=59968.msg1544396#msg1544396
Excelsior:...You are clearly a reasonable and intelligent person.