Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Action80

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 98  Next >
1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 17, 2024, 01:46:22 PM »
If you hire by ability and not ideology...

LMFAO!
Well, that explains why you're unemployed.
LMMFAO!!!

Bot supports candidates and party promoting DEI (the epitome of hiring based on nothing but ideology), then bot claims a real human is unemployed.

2
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 17, 2024, 10:36:58 AM »
If you hire by ability and not ideology...

LMFAO!

3
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 16, 2024, 07:57:58 PM »
Yeah, any text containing the words christian and values would more than likely be a problem with you, regardless of actual context.

4
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 07:55:08 PM »
So, everyone crying about the ability of a president to pardon his/her/them/they/it selves just need to STFU and go away.

Saddam to the rescue again!

[/sarcasm]

5
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 11:27:37 AM »
Why would he need to pardon himself if he can just order the DoJ to drop charges?

But he's correct: it's unknown if they can.  Never been done before.  And as we know... Trump can do no wrong.  His impeachment would never go through.  Not unless democrats controlled both houses.  Nor would he lose support.  Why would he?  None of his supporters care if he's guilty of some made up, witch-hunt crime.  Hell, they don't even care that he pushed to make the covid vaccine that's part of the plan to wipe out humanity.  Never even mention it.  Because they are loyal.  Blind loyalty.  They'd kill for him.  Wouldn't you?
You can ask the other bot as to why he believes Trump would choose to pardon himself.

The charges are bogus to begin with, they never would have been brought against him had he not decided to run again for president.

Whether you like it or not, presidents cannot pardon themselves for the exact reason I wrote before.

An application for pardon needs to be made. An application for pardon is essentially an admission of criminal guilt. Once an admission of guilt exists, that proves a criminal act was committed. Criminal acts are impeachable offenses.

All the numbnuts will continue the handwringing and lamentations of "OMB" until the next big thing comes around.

So far, I have yet to read about any Trump supporters going around killing people.

Typical bullshit.

Try harder, please.

6
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 11:06:59 AM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.


Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Jack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.

Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used?  The DoJ?  The President?  Mitch McConnel?
The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.

That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.

Truman Show shit.
But that wasn't the ruling. The ruling was that all special counsels were unconstitutional.  All of them.
" ...is there a statute in the United States Code that authorizes the appointment of Special Counsel Smith to conduct this prosecution? After careful study of this seminal issue, the answer is no."

"If the political branches wish to grant the Attorney General power to appoint Special Counsel Smith to investigate and prosecute this action with the full powers of a United States Attorney, there is a valid means by which to do so. He can be appointed and confirmed through the default method prescribed in the Appointments Clause, as Congress has directed for United States Attorneys throughout
American history, see 28 U.S.C. ยง 541, or Congress can authorize his appointment through enactment of positive statutory law consistent with the Appointments Clause."

Maybe you can find something in the ruling that mentions ALL special counsels.

7
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 06:31:40 AM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.


Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Jack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.

Ok, so what was the correct, proper, standing person or group that should have been used?  The DoJ?  The President?  Mitch McConnel?
The correct proper way to appoint special counsel is for Congress to approve the appointment.

That is why Mueller never went anywhere and why Smith was going nowhere.

Truman Show shit.

8
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 16, 2024, 06:29:09 AM »
If you don't think such would continue 100 fold if Trump becomes POTUS again then you have not been paying attention.
LOL!!!

Yeah, it is the TDS.

The only nonsense that would continue is the asshatted whining comments about the sky falling because OMB.

9
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 15, 2024, 07:49:46 PM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.
Indeed.  Her ruling will certainly be appealed but that will not complete before the election so if Trump is elected then he will immediately pardon himself and then allow the appeal to reverse her decision so all the other folks found guilty via a special prosecutor will not be let out.  Trump cares about Trump and little else. Of course if Trump is elected there will be vastly more to worry about than the special prosecutor regulations.
Jesus, the amount of bullshit.

Presidents cannot pardon themselves. All persons must apply for pardon or commutation. Once application has been filed, that is actually admission of guilt. If Trump tried this, he would lose all support and impeachment would be be successful.

Get a fucking grip and start practicing the words found in your goddamn username.

10
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 15, 2024, 07:48:00 PM »
https://edition.cnn.com/politics/live-news/trump-classified-documents-case-dismissed-07-15-24/index.html

Trump wins.  His Judge has basically said all special appointments are unconstitutional and thus the case is dismissed, which breaks from every other judge whose had this. Also, she did this after over a year!  Why didn't she dismiss it sooner?  Because she's corrupt.


Mark my words: if Trump wins, he'll appointment her to SCOTUS.
Jack Smith had no standing, AT ALL.


11
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 15, 2024, 07:45:37 PM »
Months ago?

Dude was chosen eality on as campaign season began and he wasn't dead.

Regardless, I'm just salty that Trump has a real chance of winning and implement project 2025.
Please spell out what factual issues you have with Project 2025, or is it just another bot post.

12
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 14, 2024, 11:50:03 AM »
we had have had great news.
DEI in action.

13
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 13, 2024, 11:52:07 PM »
Trump fakes assassination attempt!

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-13631849/Donald-Trump-shots-fired-Pennsylvania.html

Look at him!  That's not someone who just got shot at.  That's someone who has a blood pack on his ear.

What evidence do you have this event was faked?

I mean, you are all the fucking way over in Norway. Guess you feel safer making asshatted comments from 5000 miles away.

14
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 13, 2024, 06:43:51 PM »
I have no idea what AATW is complaining about. The people running the shitshow are doing exactly what he wants to have done. MORE WAR...MORE PEOPLE DYING...MORE "THE SKY IS FALLING!!! THE SJY IS FALLING!!!"

The same people are running his shot over there...





15
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: July 06, 2024, 07:16:37 PM »
Trump wants a new debate!
https://www.foxnews.com/politics/trump-challenges-biden-second-presidential-debate-theres-catch

But the catch is: no moderators.  No limits.  No rules.  Allowing Trump to use a debate method that's for gullible people.
"Free and fair," didn't help Brandon the first time...

16
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 02, 2024, 04:34:23 PM »
Yeah, no.
No where has it ever been stated that official acts can not be used as evidence for illegal unofficial Acts.
I urge you to enlist some sort of translator in the future to sort out your posts, especially since it is clear nonsense, filled with much contradiction.

No one can interpret it, including its author.
Want me to quote the ruling?  Because I was paraphrasing that.
Paraphrasing? I am not sure you know what that means.

17
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 02, 2024, 12:35:16 PM »
Yeah, no.
No where has it ever been stated that official acts can not be used as evidence for illegal unofficial Acts.
I urge you to enlist some sort of translator in the future to sort out your posts, especially since it is clear nonsense, filled with much contradiction.

No one can interpret it, including its author.

18
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump
« on: July 02, 2024, 11:03:03 AM »
The Supreme Court did nothing but reiterate what was already known about the limits of POTUS immunity. In addition, Justice Thomas spelled out what will happen when the question of Jack Smith's appointment arrives in front of them.

Cases closed.

19
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: June 30, 2024, 04:55:04 PM »
We have a two-party system where each party nominates one candidate. Wanting the party to nominate a different candidate does not mean anyone is opposed to free and fair elections.
Jesus...How stupid do the people within the party need to be to ignore the alarm bells from day-fucking-one concerning this real-life Herbert?

You can try to peddle that nonsense somewhere else, Saddam.

There is nothing fair and equitable about any of your line of bs.

20
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden
« on: June 30, 2024, 08:08:30 AM »
If there is anything that definitively shows it is liberals care nothing for free and fair elections, it is the shit show of Brandon. All these supposed people that are casting votes for this fucking pedophile are now crying for him to be removed from the ballot.

Pages: [1] 2 3 ... 98  Next >