Theoretically, if you were high enough , had a powerful enough telescope, and filters or other means to penetrate the "atmoplane" (and they do exist) you should be able to see the "ice wall" from any place on earth ......if the earth was flat.
This is incorrect for more reasons than I care to list. Would you mind explaining why you think this might be the case?
I do find some portions of the flat earth claim to breach their own Zetetic demands. How can Zetetic scientist believe in a dome they have never touched and a an ice wall they have never seen? Isn't the Zetetic demand that one must observe it to embrace it?
I can only speak for myself, but: I have witnessed the Ice Wall, and I do not believe in the Firmament. The latter is not a particularly common belief.
In being able to see the ice wall from any place on earth , I was assuming. :
You would have to be in some place high enough where you would be able to see over any thing that would obstruct your view of the ice wall.
On second thought I can see where you would not be able to see the ice wall from
ANY place on earth.
Flat earth reasonings as to places where you
COULD and
COULD NOT see the ice wall would be appreciated from the flat earth view pont.
You state you have witnessed the ice wall.
Have you been able to see it in its entirety it as a continuous ice wall of some 80,000 miles ?
Were your observations by air or by sea ? How long did you take to do this ?
Correctly if I'm wrong, but I believe you are the first person from whom I have read this claim ?
If you do not believe in the firmament, what is your belief of a dome, or what ever there is above the earth, etc.?
Or the horizon ? What would it be and where would it be on a flat earth ?