1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: FE radius (UAFE estimate)

« on: August 28, 2023, 04:47:59 AM »

The value of the radius is one of the most important elements of FET. If we know the radius, we can calculate the year as well as the month of the next reversal of the magnetic pole (the shift of the stellar dome as well).

Everyone on youtube, many other forums, is totally preoccupied with this issue, since it cannot be ignored anymore: when will the reversal of the magnetic poles take place? None of their dates can be justified, it is only FET which can offer a precise estimate.

You think that Auckland to Santiago de Chile was the most difficult route I had to deal with over the years? No, it was Juneau to Santiago de Chile:

https://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=38712.msg961302#msg961302

How would you calculate the FE radius if you guys don't know the extents of FE into Antarctica?  The azimuthal Gleason projection has a 12,500 mile radius because it has a defined south "edge."

2

Flat Earth Theory / Antarctic question and the midnight Sun from a glober.

« on: August 27, 2023, 03:15:37 PM »

I am a glober and have some knowledge about how the Sun works on the globe model.  The Antarctic Circle (66.5° South) is defined by the fact it can observe 24 hours Sun for 1 day a year (the December solstice).  Traveling further south, that period becomes longer and longer.  At the south pole, its 6 months.  I've heard all the "we can't explore" reasoning for why an Antarctic venture isn't worth it for flat-Earthers.  Proving or disproving the midnight Sun in Antarctic region should be paramount and you don't even have to be on the continent itself to view it.  Where is the crowdfunding and interest in FE that can get somebody or a group down there?  And even if you don't want to go to the Antarctic circle, surely seeing 23 hours of Sunlight slightly further north (on the solstice) would still be good enough evidence against flat-Earth, yes?