Who's attacking?
I've seen the original, I've seen the rebuttals, there's nothing of any significance to what she says. She was a low-level functionary who may have overheard something that vaguely suggested something, that she made into a big deal.
Right. And as I’ve said the the thing she overheard could well have been 2 people laughing about the exact opposite of what she inferred. Hard to say as obviously none of us were there.
This is a classic heads I win, tails you lose.
If the video goes unopposed then it’s
“Aha! They can’t refute what is being said, we are on to something!”
If the person is roundly debunked then it’s
“Aha! They’re on the attack, we are on to something!”
She really doesn’t say anything of substance in the whole video.