1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Covid-19 vaccine two shots
« on: Today at 02:16:00 PM »
Thanks for highlighting the CDC was attempting to cover up the reports.
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Where do you come up with the idea the source of the light used in the video is on a scale of 1:1 to the map?
As I mentioned to Tom, the desktop model setup in the YouTube video is highly inaccurate because A) the Earth's atmosphere is being represented by a solid piece of magnifying glass and B) the local spotlight Sun is represented as being very large in scale (almost 1:1 scale using a flashlight) to the diameter of the flat earth plane.
And you can keep claiming that Octantis can be seen at all three locations at the same time and that is simply a lie. There is no verified instance of this ever happening.There might be a time when two of the three southern continent locations such as South America and Africa see the night stars at the same time, but never all three (South America, Africa and Australia) at the same time.
https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/sunearth.html
Here is summer on June 21, 2021 with added green marker for "a star":
Nice cherry picking of data. You've been shown before that this isn't true.
From the same website:
Now locate the star between the southern tip of Aftica and Madagascar on your monopole map and all three continents can view it at the same time except that South America and Australia will be looking nowhere near south as happens in reality.
Quite by chance I came across this short explanation of the path of an eclipse on a round earth:If there was ever more solid evidence of a pure bot thread response than ^this, I would be shocked.
You might find it answers some of the above questions.
Incorrect.I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
"Talaat says the best source of research stemming from VAERS is the CDC, because they are able to trace the records backward and verify them."
https://publichealth.jhu.edu/2022/what-vaers-is-and-isnt
Which hasn't been done.
https://icandecide.org/v-safe-data/
Read em for yourself. The raw data (which you are referencing) has alot of "no." "None" "just got the shot" "soreness" , etc...
So its much, much less than what you wrote.
I think you fail to realize these are reports that have been screened by the CDC and have been found to be legitimate.https://www.linkedin.com/posts/draryan_cdc-releases-780000-covid-vaccine-injury-activity-7181846614393655296-leK2
"Despite what the CDC says, it’s unclear whether the agency was asleep at the wheel or intentionally steering the Titanic into an iceberg."
780,000...that is a fairly large number.
780,000 people who posted whatever they wanted at anytime. Yep, totally legitimate and helpful and in no way able to be abused.
What does any of these statements mean relative to the shape of the earth?There is nothing indicating this system is based on RE. It is simply pattern based.QuoteThe coordinates of the Sun used in these eclipse predictions have been calculated on the basis of the JPL DE406 solar system ephemeris. This ephemeris consists of computer representations of the positions, velocities and accelerations of major Solar System bodies
And from:
https://eclipsewise.com/help/jpl-de.htmlQuoteThe observational data in the fits has been an evolving set, including: ranges (distances) to planets measured by radio signals from spacecraft, direct radar-ranging of planets, two-dimensional position fixes (on the plane of the sky) by VLBI of spacecraft, transit and CCD telescopic observations of planets and small bodies, and laser-ranging of retroreflectors on the Moon, among others.
They do it using a pattern of historical movements of the sun and moon relative to the celestial sphere coordinates. It has nothing to do with RE or FE.QuoteOf course they are not wrong. When you have a couple of thousand years of observing repeating patterns, you can pretty much write that down.Again, the pattern only gives you a fairly rough indication of where and when the eclipse will be. To predict it to the accuracy they do now you have to do a load of more complicated modelling and they do that using a model of the solar system, not a FE model.
There is nothing indicating this system is based on RE. It is simply pattern based.If the Saros cycles originated with a culture adhering to a Flat Earth system, and that is what predicts the paths, then that is the FE method.Saros cycles don't predict the exact path.
This site has a list of past and future eclipses, including today's, and explains how the predictions are calculated:
https://eclipsewise.com/solar/SEhelp/de406-predictions.html
Of course they are not wrong. When you have a couple of thousand years of observing repeating patterns, you can pretty much write that down.QuoteThe coordinates of the Sun used in these eclipse predictions have been calculated on the basis of the JPL DE406 solar system ephemeris. This ephemeris consists of computer representations of the positions, velocities and accelerations of major Solar System bodies
Doesn't sound like a FE way of doing it to me. There's a lot of people booking hotel rooms on the basis of predictions like this, I reckon we'd know about it if they were wrong.
Having advanced to over 60 years on the flat earth plane, I believe it is exactly the opposite of how you choose to frame it in your post.I see the issue has relegated to the necessity of redefining the word vaccine.Yes, exactly - the anti-vaxxers decided to provide their own, new definition of what a "vaccine" is, and then tried to convince others to adopt it. It worked with some, but not with most.
I just happen to think it's unproductive.
I see the issue has relegated to the necessity of redefining the word vaccine.You cannot vaccinate against respiratory illness. It is a fool's errand.Sure you can. The flu vaccine is effective, as is the COVID-19 vaccine. It significantly reduces the likelihood of an individual contracting the disease, reduces the severity of the symptoms if they do, and limits exposure of the wider population. You shouldn't have to have one (I'm not a fan of forcing people to do stuff in general), but I don't think the fearmongering is helpful either.
The only way I can think of to argue otherwise would be to present this as a binary - either the vaccine entirely eradicates a disease, with no traces of it ever found again, or it doesn't. But that's very reductive and kinda pointless.
EDIT: I originally calledI am under the impression that all of those persons having anything positive to write about this vaccine (i.e., pushing for mandatory vaxxes, how safe and effective it is) should now be rethinking their feeble attempts to denigrate those that were speaking out against the vaccine. You cannot vaccinate against respiratory illness. It is a fool's errand.Thorkmyself stupid in this post. It has been edited to only strongly imply it.
If the Saros cycles originated with a culture adhering to a Flat Earth system, and that is what predicts the paths, then that is the FE method.It's an admission that they don't have a real eclipse prediction method based on modern RE theories and are still using the Saros Cycle, an ancient pattern-based eclipse predicting scheme created by a society of Flat Earthers.Can you show the FE method of predicting eclipse paths?
It's an admission that they don't have a real eclipse prediction method based on modern RE theories and are still using the Saros Cycle, an ancient pattern-based eclipse predicting scheme created by a society of Flat Earthers.Well, that too seems to be the case.
As I understand the Saros theory, if there is an eclipse in your state that is not on this table, it will be part of a different Saros Cycle; this table only refers to Saros Cycle Number 145. Or did you think that only 16 eclipses would occur globally over a 260 year period?Not at all.
The upcoming total eclipse occurring in my state next Monday in this chart posted by a RE-adherent?