Show Posts
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
You seriously think that the fact he's not actually having the booster in the White House (if that's what that is supposed to be) is a real zinger?The question is simple.
OK, dude...
Did they show the area to be a set on TV when broadcasting the "booster shot?"Remember the green screen presser outside? They are now just building sets.Literally no idea what point you think you're making here.
Are you claiming they were trying to be deceptive? Pretty dumb to invite the press if so.
So, according to you, Joe demanded the set to be built for the photo op.Remember the green screen presser outside? They are now just building sets. Joe Biden is not running the country.
Yeah, I remember...
And comedians making cracks about the Biden booster shot theatrics, definitely funny. Kind of a leap to say he's not running the country based upon comedy. Basically an odd illogical non sequitur on your part.
Lethal antibodies: REGN10987 and B38Define "cmRNA," please.
https://assets.researchsquare.com/files/rs-612103/v2_covered.pdf?c=1623875739
Pathogenic antibodies induced by spike proteins of
COVID-19 and SARS-CoV viruses
https://web.archive.org/web/20210901043025/https://www.theepochtimes.com/why-is-covid-so-severe_3970589.html
https://web.archive.org/web/20210901062152/https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-021-00149-1 (rogue antibodies)
However, the immune system will also produce isomeric REGN10987 and B38 antibodies in response to the cmRNA vaccines.
I ignored nothing and was dishonest about nothing.Well, when you're right, you're right.I'm positive you have the stats to support the statement that seatbelts did not reduce deathsLook it up yourself.
Don't take my word for it.
The trendline for number of motor vehicle fatalities has remained relatively unchanged over the past 70 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in_U.S._by_year
33,186 deaths in 1950, 36,56 in 2018.
Case closed!
...except of course you're ignoring that over that period car use went up 7 times and the population more than doubled.
And you're ignoring the big rise in deaths from 1950 to 1980 which has been going down ever since despite the continued increase in population and car usage. Are seatbelts solely responsible for that? No, cars have got safer in lot of other ways too with better design and testing. But it's undoubtably a factor
I can't tell if you're just being dishonest here or are terrible at analysing data.
Great, terrific.Seatbelts did not reduce deaths.
That trendline has remained relatively steady over the past 70 years.I'm positive you have the stats to support the statement that seatbelts did not reduce deathsLook it up yourself.
Don't take my word for it.
The trendline for number of motor vehicle fatalities has remained relatively unchanged over the past 70 years.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Motor_vehicle_fatality_rate_in_U.S._by_year
https://www.statista.com/statistics/184607/deaths-by-motor-vehicle-related-injuries-in-the-us-since-1950/
No.
Also:
"From 1979 to 2005, the number of deaths per year decreased 14.97% while the number of deaths per capita decreased by 35.46%"
Its at this point that i see now that you are a waste of space on this forum. If something as simple and universally agreed upon as seatbelts is beyond you, then what hope do you have at anything more complex like viruses and vaccines? No... You can't be reasoned with. Your mind is like a rock: impenetrable. What is there can never be changed or removed. You will never know anything more than what you knew before. You will never change. So off to ignore you go.
I'm positive you have the stats to support the statement that seatbelts did not reduce deathsLook it up yourself.
Seatbelts did not reduce deaths.The answer is rather simple isn't it?Demonstrating your fauz apology to be a faux apology is typical.Israel never got to 96%. Their highest was like 75% of eligable people. ( So anyone under 18 is not counted)In one hospital in Israel, it was 96 percent.
Do yourself and everybody else a huge freaking favor and just stop posting. You cannot even read for christ's sake.
Ah, you're right. Appologies.
Which makes the post less concerning. We know it was the delta varient. We know people can still get sick.
But 16% transmission rate in a hospital is not bad for it. 30% for unvaxxed people tho. Thats pretty big, no? Double.
What part of "a difference that doesn’t reach statistical significance because the unvaccinated group is too small," eludes you?
No difference in viral load either.
Makes one wonder why the huge push for making this vaccine mandatory.
If you get it, it doesn't prevent you from catching the disease or spreading the virus.
If you get the virus, you will maintain the same viral load.
To reduce the risk of serious symptoms if you get it. (PPE is to reduce the risk of getting it)
Lets say 2/100 people who get corona have to go to the hospital. Of those 2, one requires a ventelator. And half the time they die.
So you have a .5% chance of death.
Your local hospital services 100,000 people(so 100k people live nearby) and has 10 beds for ventelator patients.
If 50% of people get sick, 25,000 people will be hospitalized. 12,500 will require ventelators. 6,250 will die.
Even if this happens over a year, that hospital is going to run out of ventelators. People will die from lack of care.
But if we can reduce the hospitalization down 75% with the vaccine, we have a much better chance. And thats the point.
To put it another way...
You sound like people who fought against seatbelts in the 70s. Did they prevent all deaths? No. Did they cause issues like being trapped in your car? Sometimes, yes. Did it help reduce deaths? Yes. Add in crumple zones, air bags, and other safety features and deaths just keep dropping.
And that is the point.
Demonstrating your fauz apology to be a faux apology is typical.Israel never got to 96%. Their highest was like 75% of eligable people. ( So anyone under 18 is not counted)In one hospital in Israel, it was 96 percent.
Do yourself and everybody else a huge freaking favor and just stop posting. You cannot even read for christ's sake.
Ah, you're right. Appologies.
Which makes the post less concerning. We know it was the delta varient. We know people can still get sick.
But 16% transmission rate in a hospital is not bad for it. 30% for unvaxxed people tho. Thats pretty big, no? Double.
Israel never got to 96%. Their highest was like 75% of eligable people. ( So anyone under 18 is not counted)In one hospital in Israel, it was 96 percent.
Okay, find one.I'll wear a mask when manufacturers state on the packaging that wearing the mask is an effective measure in prevention and transmission of the virus.Whether you're vaccinated or not, you're gonna get the virus. Fauci admits there is no good answer as to why people with prior infection need the jab:
It's the same question for you and Tom over and over with no good answer. How fucked up would the world around you have to get before you would cooperate with and enforce public measures to curtail the spread of a threat? Aren't you really saying that nothing would ever make you submit to the socialist horror and subjugation of wearing a mask?
Generally, some have suggested enacting mandates based on local health care infrastructure capacity getting over run by a certain percent. Others (nobody round here) suggest mandates be enacted upon double digit mortality rates.
Just tell us, "I'll wear a mask when you put it on my cold dead body."
All of your BS, and make no mistake for it's a HUGE amount, is worthless.
Name one expert that says we can vaccinate our way out of a pandemic.
Otherwise, all of your provisions here in this forum are as useful as a braying jackass.
Wait wait wait...
You want it on the package? That's it?!
Geeze... you're easy to please.
I mean, if it says its an certain level of protection, do you really need it to say "Is 99% effective at preventing the transmission of viruses when used properly"? Like a condom says? Becasue if so... I'm sure we can find a box.
https://arstechnica.com/science/2021/10/meet-molnupiravir-mercks-thor-inspired-pill-that-hammers-covid/If you want an anti-vaxxer opinion, you should probably ask Roundy or AATW.
Tom bishop, what's your opinion of this? I'm genuinely curious as to what an antivaxxer thinks of this new treatment.
I'll wear a mask when manufacturers state on the packaging that wearing the mask is an effective measure in prevention and transmission of the virus.Whether you're vaccinated or not, you're gonna get the virus. Fauci admits there is no good answer as to why people with prior infection need the jab:
It's the same question for you and Tom over and over with no good answer. How fucked up would the world around you have to get before you would cooperate with and enforce public measures to curtail the spread of a threat? Aren't you really saying that nothing would ever make you submit to the socialist horror and subjugation of wearing a mask?
Generally, some have suggested enacting mandates based on local health care infrastructure capacity getting over run by a certain percent. Others (nobody round here) suggest mandates be enacted upon double digit mortality rates.
Just tell us, "I'll wear a mask when you put it on my cold dead body."
