Trump has been accused of sexual misconduct by well over a dozen women.
It continues to be the case that very few of these allegations went particularly far. Unfortunately, it doesn't matter how many people make unsubstantiated accusations about the bad man you don't like. They remain unsubstantiated, and the decent thing to do is to presume Trump's innocence until these totally sincere women choose to present some evidence for their claims.
Innocent until proven guilty is how the legal system sees people, and that's how it should be.
It doesn't apply here though. Here the public is trying to decide who best to represent them and lead them. We have no way of forcing the truth, we can't hold a trial or issue a subpoena so we have to judge character with the evidence we have.
And we have a lot of evidence that Trump is a terrible person when it comes to women. How he treated his multiple wives, the things he's said, the multiple women who were paid off, all the allegations.
To me it's pretty clear the guy is a terrible person. Even if you just stick to the things he's done legally, they show his character to be horrible.
Obama was just as reviled, if not more by the right and we didn't see a dozen women accusing him or him paying them off.
President Clinton did have a number of credible accusers, and I don't think he was fit to be President either. He didn't break a law with what he did to that blue dress, but he certainly crossed a moral line.
A conviction for sexual assault isn't required for someone to be unfit to be a leader. To me, Trump's behaviors even without the accusations are enough to give him the boot.