Which THEY?
If you don't, or just refuse to, believe in a "they" then there is really not much to discuss. There is more than enough circumstantial evidence, along with plenty of concrete proof, that there is a cabal (many of them) bent on influencing global affairs to their advantage and pushing their sick agenda. Either you haven't done your research or you're just happy living under a rock.
An armed populace as big as the one in the country I live in is a problem for even the strongest militaries in the world. It's something that they are afraid of and frankly don't want to deal with at full strength.
In my opinion, the ultimate goal is 100% dependence on the state for everything, including your safety and protection --which as we've seen during the violent crackdown on protestors, and the slaying of Americans by police, that that would be a terrible idea.
I asked which ones not questioning if they exist.
Also, why would they want state dependancy? That's literally the dumbest idea. Its expensive as shit and you risk making people angry at you when you can't deliver.
Something about absolute control appeals to these people. It's a gradual, very slow process, but we are already seeing it unfold. The middle class has been under assault all across the world. Poverty is definitely a prerequisite to surrendering your rights. The ever constant spectre of terrorism and war with [insert other world power] has caused people all around the world to give up their privacy and liberties for perceived security.
Right...
"I love absolute control! Let's take 100 years to do it so I won't be alive when it happens."
Seriously, this has been going on for thousands of years. It's not a conspiracy, it's human nature. When humans get scared, they want someone to save them. When the threat has passed, they get uppity and want freedoms.
It's an endless cycle of peace and war. Fear and safety. Love and hate.
Look, here in Norway the middle class is alive and well. Your mioptic view is the problem. You can't see that the "attack" is an attack at all, it's simply human nature: those who have wish for more. Those who have not, want more. Everyone wants more and those who have are more powerful at keeping what they have than those who do not. The entire French revolution was built on this concept. Heck, what constitutes middle class is so vague, it's different based on who you talk to. You might as well ask "how good is good enough?"