No, I'm pretty sure that is what you were trying to argue:
[...]
You even rephrased it a few times ("reverse," "retroactively," "right to left") to make it clearer. I'm not misunderstanding you.
No, Saddam. Take a step back and try to read the conversation again. Try to understand what everyone's saying, together with context, then you might be able to actually not derp. It is true that in order to make your insane accusation, you necessarily need to read Trump's statements in reverse or to believe that kissing is groping, but it is not true that "he never even really said that he did those things to begin with
because of the chronological order of the phrases he used, or something like that". The fact that you'd have to read Trump's statements in reverse to believe what you believe is just an easily-accessible proof of just how detached from reality your claim is.
Pointing out that your belief necessarily requires one of two nonsensical assumptions is an overly-simplified but nonetheless effective form of a proof by contradiction.
The root of the argument, which you've done a marvellous job at missing entirely, is as follows:
- Trump did indeed never say that he has ever groped a woman. This goes directly against your claim that you did.
- Trekky attempted to rush to your rescue by presenting a transcript of Trump saying that he kisses women without waiting for consent. That's bad on Trump, but it doesn't help back up your accusation.
- It is possible that Trekky was referring to a couple of sentences he cut out of the transcript for some reason (perhaps because he didn't originally mean to refer to it?) - "You can do anything [...] grab'em by the pussy [...] you can do anything [...]". Alternatively, he did actually mean to inform us that kissing is groping.
- The claim that you can do something is different from the claim that you did do something. There are
three two possible responses to that:
- You can either claim that I'm wrong and that "I can do <x>" and "I did do <x>" are one and the same. If that's a position you hold, I have nothing to offer to you but personal insults.
- You do not believe that "can" and "do" are the same, but you still somehow believe that Trump did say "do". For that to work, you'd have to ignore everything else that has been said, and rely on reading Trump's sentences backwards. Unless you have a good reason to do so, that in itself is really silly. But even if you did have a reason to do so, there is so much material that goes against your claim, and so little material that supports it. You'd simply be so much better off producing some evidence.
You're wrong and you know understand why jk that's never gonna happen
You made this argument, and it's only fair that you get called out for how silly it is.
Well, it's either that or you think that kissing is sex. I agree, both of your options are incredibly silly and you should probably come back with a better argument. But hey-ho, here you are :^)
Nice call-out culture reference tho, definitely helps to back up my accusations of you acting like SJWs. Now you just need to break into your trademark rant about how I'm not American and/or how I'm too privileged, which precludes me from making a point.
Also, it's very important to point out that you have now twice claimed that Trump didn't deny saying he groped women, and that you believe he would have said them. I tried explaining once, but you were having none of it, so here's a transcript proving you to be thoroughly and utterly wrong:
AC: [...] You bragged that you have sexually assaulted women.
DT: I don't think you understood.
[snip - lots of Trump dodging the question]
AC: So, you're saying you never did that.
DT: I said things that frankly, you hear these things. And I was embarrassed by it. But I have tremendous respect for women.
AC: Have you ever done those things?
DT: No, I have not.
Guys I cucked out and voted for Hillary. Sorry...
It's okay, we all knew you were a traitor. That's why you don't have access to the secret meme stash.[/list]