1

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: October 01, 2023, 04:42:01 AM »

https://thefederalist.com/2023/09/29/yes-the-biden-impeachment-hearing-presented-evidence-of-corruption-lots-of-it/

mounds of damning evidence now piling up by the day, including the release on Wednesday by the House Ways and Means Committee of reams of text messages and emails between Hunter Biden, his uncle James Biden, and a colorful array of foreign oligarchs, business associates, and bagmen.

hey which one of those is joe biden

And how many of the actual texts and emails are documenting crimes?
Like I can release gigabytes of emails but most of them are reminders about payments.
And as someone who works for a major company, he would have texts and emails with business associates.  Probably even major foreign investors.  Especially when you work in a foreign country.


As an example:
I reguarly communicate company secrets with foreign entities.
The foreign entities being my coworkers.

2

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: October 01, 2023, 04:33:39 AM »

Yeah that makes sense.  If the assessment is based on profit value (basically) then its gonna be worth a lot less than if it was a mansion, which is a residential property. 

I admit, I did not think business and residential properties were assessed differently but seems like they are.

So Tom's posting of a house is worthless.

3

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Coronavirus Vaccine and You

« on: September 29, 2023, 05:25:45 AM »

So a cancer took 4 months to go through stages 1-3 but 6 months to go through stage 4?
Also, how does he know the kid didn't have brain cancer prior?  Did he screen him for cancer before the vaccine?

Sounds sus.

4

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: September 27, 2023, 04:29:57 AM »

https://twitter.com/AndrewFeinberg/status/1706767627723681850

It looks bad but the box checked is "non-final disposition" so dunno what that means overall.

5

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 25, 2023, 12:41:25 PM »

Question:
When the people manage their land, what kind of system do they use to manage it?  Like disputes or public projects like road construction/patching?  Or water delivery?

Yeah, you just described what government should be for instead of a superstructure that rules over everything tyranically while whispering sweet-nothings into the ears of corporate "journalists" who don't even live there. Thanks for "fact-checking" nothing again.

Don't forget to pay your taxes.

I ask a question and you answer with nothing.
I'm just trying to figure out what you mean by the people managing their own land becauase I was under the impression they could already do that, within legal limits. (Ie. No dumping hazardous waste)

6

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 25, 2023, 10:35:57 AM »

As is often the case with him, this is at best a huge distortion of what the governor actually was talking about.  Which was about ways to prevent developers from rushing in to take advantage of the local people.
https://www.poynter.org/fact-checking/2023/maui-city-smart-project-state-lands-josh-green/

Yeah, they don't want to allow any free-market nonsense, do they? Gov. and club members only.

Previously the land owners and the people were resonsible for managing their land and now the government is. Thanks for "fact-checking" nothing.

Oh, I forgot the government stooges are the good guys and they no doubt want what's best for the people.

Question:
When the people manage their land, what kind of system do they use to manage it?  Like disputes or public projects like road construction/patching?  Or water delivery?

7

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 25, 2023, 06:39:43 AM »

Anyone watching the fist fifteen seconds of the video knows that he said "couldn't be won".

Then why did you not write that?  I just read what you wrote.  Never watched the video.

I sense some denial here. Not to worry though, because you are in warm company with the liberal media.

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/wapo-scrambles-after-own-poll-accidentally-shows-trump-crushing-biden



https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2023/09/abc-news-takes-down-video-gop-analyst-citing/



https://truthsocial.com/@realDonaldTrump/111123274488248502

Considering how you spent the months of October, November, December of 2020 and January to March of 2021 saying how Trump won/will win/have the election overturned... I'm guessing you're an expert on denial.

8

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 21, 2023, 07:33:40 PM »

I'm sorry but that sounds like he's having a stroke.
The first sentance says that biden is having his leading politician arrested, including Obama.

"We won an election they said we could win" - uhhh... Yeah?

9

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 05:26:24 PM »

I'm confused.  Why would anyone elect people to do a job like run the department of housing, if they want to do the job via democratic vote?
Like... most people don't know how to do city planning.  They want things that make no sense or don't actually work.  Like they can look at a huge offramp and go "why is it so big?  Just make it a short, straight line. " all because they don't understand descelleration.

So why wouldn't those people do their job?



Also: when I ask questions and use my brain yo refuse your videos, you call me an idiot and a sheep.  Doesn't seem like your goal is to make people think, unless they think what you think.

What an asanine comment considering the information given in the video and what happened.

Ok, pal. Clearly, you're on the wrong forum again.

All you can do is ask dumb questions and talk about space lasers when 99% of what I'm talking about has nothing to do with space lasers.

Having finished the video, I totally agree with you.  This was a consoiracy ti take land for the development of a bike and walking path.
Its totally obvious!  Who makes that?  People who wear custom baby seal leather boots that's who! 

And all those angry people spouting angry and random bits if information and calling it a conspiracy is totally right.  I mean, how else do you determine the truth except for random, angry people yelling loudly about things they know nothing about?  Its how we KNOW thst the DC pizzaria had that whole sex dungeon in its basement that totally exists but no one can find it.


But in all seriousness, I saw nothing presented that actually sounds evil. 
I mean, this fire may have been caused by a careless tourist, which would make it a non-natural disaster.  But I doubt the governemnt intentionally wanted to burn away all those houses just so the insurance companies would need to pay up alot of money to rebuild them.

10

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 19, 2023, 04:53:35 PM »

As far as I can tell the DNC refuses to even hold primary debates.

https://ballotpedia.org/Presidential_debates,_2024



https://www.foxnews.com/media/democrats-rip-dnc-not-holding-2024-primary-debates-robs-voters

Yeah.  The Repubs did that in 2020.  Its all about ensuring the emcubrant isn't primaried and thus divide the party.

11

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 12:54:32 PM »

So your goal is to, instead of assuming this is a conspiracy, prove it.  Show me developer contracts or demands from the locals who were burned out/killed showing they wanted the land.  Don't just tell me.

It really is not. The goal of what I post is to get people aware & thinking and to do their own research and use their own brain & discernment.

But here's one of the projects. Just one. Plus more interesting info and statements from the people.

I'm confused.  Why would anyone elect people to do a job like run the department of housing, if they want to do the job via democratic vote?
Like... most people don't know how to do city planning.  They want things that make no sense or don't actually work.  Like they can look at a huge offramp and go "why is it so big?  Just make it a short, straight line. " all because they don't understand descelleration.

So why wouldn't those people do their job?



Also: when I ask questions and use my brain to refute your videos, you call me an idiot and a sheep.  Doesn't seem like your goal is to make people think, unless they think what you think.

12

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 11:58:56 AM »

You'll have to excuse my poor history of hawaii knowledge.
Why is Lahaina so important?  Or the most important?  And why is it unowned by the state of hawaii like the rest of Hawaii?

You just have to do 2 minutes of research to find the info.

https://www.pbs.org/newshour/nation/analysis-burning-of-lahainas-sacred-sites-is-a-major-loss-for-native-hawaiians-but-their-history-will-live-on

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=801399451773263

That woman user her brain and she knows what's going on unlike you.

See, thats more plausable than a space laser from china creating wildfires.

Is it possible this is a land grab by evil corporations and rich people?  Sure.
But you've just shown speculation.  No actual evidence this is occurring. And after 9 pages, this is the first time you've even mentioned it.

So your goal is to, instead of assuming this is a conspiracy, prove it.  Show me developer contracts or demands from the locals who were burned out/killed showing they wanted the land.  Don't just tell me. 

13

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 11:02:58 AM »

Ok. 
So that tells me nothing.
I'm sorry but you haven't established he's a conquror nor have you established a motive.  Half of those reasons only apply if you openly want to oppress people.  And it requires actualky ordering the destruction, not just taking advantage of it.

You can't start with the assumption that someone is an evil conquror, you must prove it.  And thus far I haven't seen him try to take over Hawaii.

Well, of course it tells you nothing. That's expected.

Let's just conveniently forget the fact that Hawaii is all conquered land and Lahaina was one of the important pieces of land (potentially the most important?) that they didn't fully own . And now gov. + the banks & the corps are going to own it all. But that's just life, I guess.

That guy's not top of the food chain anyway. Not even close.

You'll have to excuse my poor history of hawaii knowledge.
Why is Lahaina so important?  Or the most important?  And why is it unowned by the state of hawaii like the rest of Hawaii?

14

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 08:33:52 AM »

So whats his motivation?  Why would he intentionally want to burn as many people as possible?

Oh, I don't know. Let's ask ChatGPT about it.

Dual1ty: Why would a conqueror intentionally want to burn as many innocent people as possible and not just raze their homes to the ground?

ChatGPT: The actions of conquerors throughout history have often been driven by a complex combination of factors, including political, strategic, psychological, and cultural considerations. While it's essential to recognize that not all conquerors have intentionally sought to harm innocent people or engage in wanton destruction, there have been instances where such actions occurred. Here are some possible reasons why a conqueror might intentionally choose to burn and harm innocent people rather than just razing their homes:

1. Psychological Warfare: Conquerors may engage in acts of extreme violence and terror to demoralize and intimidate the local population and any potential resistance. By causing fear and trauma, they hope to subdue resistance more effectively.

2. Revenge: Sometimes conquerors have personal or collective grievances against the people they are conquering, which can lead to a desire for vengeance. Burning homes and harming civilians can be seen as a way to exact revenge for perceived wrongs.

3. Ethnic or Religious Conflict: In cases where conquerors belong to a different ethnic or religious group than the local population, there may be deep-seated hatred or animosity, leading to violence against innocent people as a means of asserting dominance.

4. Economic Gain: Conquerors may pillage and burn to seize valuable resources, including crops, livestock, and other assets. Destroying the livelihoods of the local population can weaken their ability to resist and may serve the conqueror's economic interests.

5. Establishing Authority: Some conquerors may believe that by inflicting violence and destruction, they can establish their authority more firmly, demonstrating their power and ruthlessness to both the local population and potential rivals.

6. Deterrence: Conquerors may want to deter other potential adversaries from challenging their rule in the future. By making an example of a conquered population through extreme violence, they hope to discourage any resistance.

7. Cultural and Ideological Factors: Ideological or cultural factors can also play a role in the decision to harm innocent people. Conquerors may have a belief system or ideology that justifies such actions, viewing the conquered population as inferior or deserving of punishment.

8. Lack of Control: In chaotic or unorganized conquests, conquerors may lose control over their forces, leading to indiscriminate violence and destruction. This can result in the harm of innocent people, even if it wasn't the conqueror's original intent.

It's important to note that such actions are widely condemned in modern times and considered war crimes or crimes against humanity. Conquerors who engage in these actions can face significant international and legal repercussions. Additionally, not all conquerors throughout history have pursued such brutal tactics, and many have sought to establish rule through negotiation, diplomacy, or assimilation rather than violence and destruction.

Yes, it would be widely condemned if people understood what's going on, but they choose the "nothing to see here" narrative because it's a lot less gruesome.

By the way, this is the oppositve of a "chaotic or unorganized" event, so #8 doesn't apply. Not to mention that the cops didn't know what they were doing because they don't realize they are robotized idiots.

Ok. 
So that tells me nothing.
I'm sorry but you haven't established he's a conquror nor have you established a motive.  Half of those reasons only apply if you openly want to oppress people.  And it requires actualky ordering the destruction, not just taking advantage of it.

You can't start with the assumption that someone is an evil conquror, you must prove it.  And thus far I haven't seen him try to take over Hawaii.

15

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 19, 2023, 05:15:47 AM »

Imagine calling coordinated mass murder "bad logistics".

Never attribute to malice that which is adequately explained by stupidity. -- Hanlon's razor

Why can't it be both?

It's obviously both considering that there are order-GIVERS and order-FOLLOWERS.

Let's take a look at who the chief of Maui PD is since 2021, shall we?

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2023/08/15/maui-police-chief-john-pelletier-las-vegas-response/70594938007/

Do you remember Las Vegas? Another mass murder event that had nothing to do with the official narrative & was covered up.

No such thing as coincidences when it comes to these events.

It's the same fucking guy! Time for you sleepyheads to wake the fuck up.

So whats his motivation?  Why would he intentionally want to burn as many people as possible?

16

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 19, 2023, 04:19:46 AM »

And he's not going to be primaried.  Thank you two party system....
And one does not need to be popular to drown out others.

17

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 18, 2023, 07:10:50 AM »

Imagine calling coordinated mass murder "bad logistics".

Imagine assuming it was coordinated mass murder and not just someone fucking up badly without evidence of intent to comit mass murder.

18

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 18, 2023, 06:40:36 AM »

Yeah, heard the roadblocks caused a lot of issues and got people killed.

Thats bad logistics, pure and simple.  And in a place with fires and volcanos, you'd think they'd have a better plan in place.

19

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 17, 2023, 09:09:20 PM »

When you post something, especially without comment, it is understood to be something you support.  If you post a video but do not agree with its content, you should say so.

Is that so?

All the videos I post are food for thought for those who are actually capable of thinking for themselves (not my fault that this is hard for you). Not to mention that it's all pieces of a larger puzzle because no one knows exactly what happened and hence using your brain and using discernment are obviously required.

Your interpretation that I "support" everything the videos say is utter garbage just like pretty much everything you post. And your opinion that I should announce what I personally agree or don't agree with irrelevant.

So... if I disagree with a video and pick apart its analysis, I'm not thinking for myself?    Just making sure I understand where you stand on what "thinking for yourself" means.  If I had simply agreed with the video without asking questions excpt those presented in the video, would that be "thinking for myself"?

I am not trying to misrepresent what you say, only to decipher it.  So if not in orbit, where is this weapon you are referring too and in what way does it or even might it (electrically as you say) use the power of a hurricane?

Yeah, sure... go decipher why you believe any narratives from government or MSM or "fact-checkers" even if they don't make physical sense.

Now you're asking me for the location of the murder weapon as if I am the one who did the murder. You make so much sense as always. Next you're gonna ask me to describe exactly how it operates. You're already doing it. What a genius you are.

If you must know where I stand TODAY, right now regarding the "CCP NORAD" satellites (and this is for anyone reading this, not just you because I don't care to explain anything to you) - In my opinion, the satellites probably have something to do with those specific fires (they probably were capable of igniting small local vegetation fires that spread further due to high winds and dry conditions), but nothing to do with houses and people literally getting "dustified" and nothing to do with the many anomalies such as liquified rims all over the place next to intact asphalt (which is intact all over the place too) that make it obvious to anyone who isn't a complete idiot that no wildfire caused the resulting destruction. I could name anomalies all day AND provide evidence for said anomalies because unlike you I actually do research before opening my mouth - that's the difference between me and you who are here just to bust my balls and is happy to believe any "nothing to see here" narratives.

Why would the tar and asphalt being intact be odd?
What, exactly, do you think would happen when hit with the intense heat of a wildfire then cooled once the fire ends?

20

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 17, 2023, 09:01:26 PM »

But you are forgetting something: Brand recognition.  I've never heard if Vivek.  And if I know nothing about him, why would I vote for him?  How would he even get on the ballot?

I couldn't find the rules with a quick google but I think he needs a certain percentage in the polls to be on the primary ballot.
So if he isn't a household name, few who votes in the primary is gonna vote for him.

You have to gain some organic momentum first and get a number of signatures and show of support. As a rising star you attend party conventions and are eligible to participate in the presidential debates.

Vivek met all of that and is one of the contenders in the televised mainstream debates, and has already participated in one GOP presidential debate. He went from zero point zero in the polls to ranking about third place, neck-in-neck and just above Mike Pence and Nikki Hailey. There will be more debates and the lowest people will be cast off the island until there is one remaining winner who typically becomes the GOP presidential nominee.

Indeed.  But regardless of his skills or ideas, he will be drowned out by the name Donald Trump in the media.