161

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun temperatures

« on: February 19, 2018, 11:38:01 PM »

A sun and moon under the dome.
You are not a flat earth believer.
You don't have to be.
 

162

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Another person that just has a couple questions just because I'm curious. Thanks

« on: February 19, 2018, 11:13:58 PM »

They are using word smithing in that article like lawyers and judges use.


cir·cum··nav·i·ga·tion
ˌsərkəmˌnaviˈɡāSH(ə)n/
noun
noun: circumnavigation; plural noun: circumnavigations

    the action or process of sailing or otherwise traveling all the way around something, especially the world.
    "he completed the fastest solo circumnavigation in a small vessel"
        the action of going around or avoiding an obstacle.
        "our leisurely circumnavigation of the rocks"
        the action of avoiding something difficult or unpleasant.

You see it?
Circumnavigation = the action of going around or avoiding an obstacle and the action of avoiding something difficult or unpleasant.

They spelt it out to the public but the public misunderstood the meaning of the word.


Bill Clinton ""It depends on what the meaning of the word 'is' is."

163

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun temperatures

« on: February 19, 2018, 11:03:27 PM »

The sun is pretty hot. We live in the habitable zone. Any closer, we would die. Any further away, we would die. The sun is so hot that that fraction of a distance does not matter. Might not be to do with distance but the curvature of the Earth and the composition of the atmosphere above it. And the weather depends on a lot of variables. Greenhouse gas, altitude, air pressure, humidity to name a few. Distance is a factor but not of that much influence.

You are right on every point if the world is a ball.
But if it is flat you are wrong on every point.

164

Flat Earth Theory / Re: A question about air planes.

« on: February 19, 2018, 11:00:38 PM »

Both are in the northern hemisphere and not even close to the edge.
The Arctic Circle is the center circle which is small and the outer circle is Antarctic circle which is massive.
Ask your self this question.
Why do flights fly from Canada to Europe fly over the North pole but from South Americas tip they have no flight to Australia over the South Pole?
The flights they do have follow the round the world yacht racers course.
Which I believe is the 60 parallel. (Off the top of my head so it might be wrong) 
The true around the world is the yacht race course.
Place the race coarse over the flat earth map and you will see what I am talking about.

165

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Honest Question

« on: February 19, 2018, 10:49:57 PM »

A true believer of monotheism will probarly think they are doing the work of gods enemies. Pointing out the use of satanic handsymbols used by nasa astronauts,mainstreamedia and corrupting the world through weird science and education, trying to hide god from the youth, is maybe not a coincidence. Just like the zionist prayed to golden calfs/bull worshipping idolatry. Endgame is to claim ur soul, demons were pissed and jealous when god created humans, and will do anything to drag your sinning ass along to hell. Hope you like this answer on what a true believer in one creator might think. Have a nice day.

As he stated.
In a global earth with billions of others out there with billions of chances that life is out there makes one feel like a pee on. Dust in the wind. Go ahead an act like the animal you are. After all you came from monkeys.

But if we are on a flat world with a dome then that questions all the other planets and life forms as we are told.
We are no longer billions in a sea of billions but the chosen ones to be placed in this material third dimension experience. Special sons of God that are created from divine intervention. With spirits and souls so we can assent to higher powers over the animals. Not be part of them.

If one thinks were are not singled out to be here but is just chance then think of the millions of sperms that fought over the chance to impregnate the egg just to make you. Was that chance? That sperm out preformed millions of others so yeah that is pretty special in itself.

The difference is between the ears.

Apparently the first reason hundreds of years ago to call the earth a ball was designed to get the ship captains back behind the wheel. When they had to go to further out places that they didn't know about yet to plunder for the Kings and Queens they were breaking new ground and were scared they would sail of the end of the world. So they changed the idea to a ball earth so the captains could get to plunder.

And for today, milking funds for space travel when it is impossible holds major profits.
Elon musk is said to be taking all the space money he gets and is putting it into his solar energy corporation.
Because we all know there is no Tesla floating in space when he can't even deliver the cars he said he would in 2018 until 2019.
Musk has USA government funding for his corporations close to 5 billion dollars.

Did that answer your question?

166

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun temperatures

« on: February 19, 2018, 09:34:48 PM »

"If the Sun were super close, we would be fried by temps and radiation."

Yes we would if the sun was what they said it was.
But what if it was not what they said it was? What if it was much smaller but closer.
Wouldn't a sun very close to us and much smaller give us greater temperature variations between raise and set from noon and winter to summer?

Its winter time outside right now and as I speak the sun is shining bright but where is the heat? It only makes sense that there is not much heat because the sun is closer then father and smaller then bigger.
If it was father and bigger the difference from set and raise to noon temperatures would be minuscule because  the numbers say so.
But if it was closer and smaller the differences in temperatures would be much greater because the differences in percentages wouldn't be .00000 but in full percentage points.
That would fit in line with temperature swings.

167

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 09:21:36 PM »

Of course google earth is in on the scam.
NORAD as well.
And Elon Musk and the whole NASA space program.
And schools and University's.

Opposite world like TV.
If a bank spends millions on advertising to you to buy a short term mortgage you should buy along term one because they know what they are going to do to the interest rates 6 months down the road. And they have no interest in saying you money, they want your money.

Google where the north pole location is at. NORAD puts in estimated locations with out going there all from there desk tops. They claim its going to Russia.
The only entity that goes to the north pole every year is "50 Years of Victory".
A Russian icebreaker turned tourist north pole traveler. The company logo suggests Illuminati owners through symbolism .
And they mark the poles location every time and they have it marked at going straight east to Greenland.
They have this cute sign that they stick in the ice and it says "North Pole was here" because its moving so fast these days.

Also google Q. Vrangelya Island of the north east part of Russia by the Bering Sea.
Go right down to it and you will find a slice of un-photo shopped map going straight to the north pole.
Zoom right down on it and travel it north. You will see that it is covered in ice and someone Photoshop the ocean blue over it. Whats really interesting in that slice is the black located right at the pole while everything else is white.

 

168

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 08:16:09 PM »

There is a big misconception at play.
One is that the north pole isn't covered in ice years around.
It is and google earth has photo shopped it to be open water.
Look at google earth and see how they have Greenland ice bond and the ocean above it wide open.

This year a Canadian research team went up to the north pole to research the global warming trend.
They had to turn back because the ice was to thick and much more then they expected.
So much for their global warming theory.

Also your comment about reflecting energy into space does apply to a flat earth because a flat earth would need the dome.

169

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How to get to the other side?

« on: February 19, 2018, 08:06:15 PM »

North and south is a different issue.
Brings this to mind.

170

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How to get to the other side?

« on: February 19, 2018, 07:57:29 PM »

If you guys truly believe the earth is flat and it isn't a big joke, then explain this. If the earth is flat as if it's depicted on a map, lets say a plane flew east until it reached the "edge" of the world. How does it instantly get to the west side of the flat earth?

Think of the map as a clock with the hands moving in a clocks traditional way (clock wise) from north pole.
Clock wise is going west and counter clock wise is east.
You can for ever go in one direction and never hit an edge.

171

Flat Earth Theory / Re: How big is the Flat Earth?

« on: February 19, 2018, 07:43:15 PM »

According to science the earth has a 6,371 km radius.
On a flat earth the circumference would be 39940.952360679 km would be the outer circle and that would give us 126948322.98318 square km.

172

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Is the Moon Flat?

« on: February 19, 2018, 07:32:52 PM »

I have seen on the planets page of TFES that you believe that the earth is not a planet since it is flat.  The moon is also not defined as a planet, but rather a satellite.  Does this mean that the Moon is Flat? If not, can you please explain why it is round.

All balls are round but everything round is not a ball.
A dinner plate is round and not a ball.
Doesn't make it not round, just not a ball.
Does that help?

173

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Sun temperatures

« on: February 19, 2018, 07:27:23 PM »

My point is the atmosphere shouldn't have any changing effect on the sun rays with a 0.000004258689839572193% difference. Its way to minuscule.

But if the sun was super close to us then atmosphere conditions would have a great effect which would account for the different temperature through the day and seasons.

Your comments about the atmosphere having an effect on the variations is exactly what I am trying to point out.
Because we notice the differences as you mentioned proves that science sun earth relationship is flawed.

174

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 07:14:09 PM »

Ice is ice. If my cooler had ten pounds of ice in it it would be just as cold as if it had 100 pounds of ice in it.

But changing the temperature of said cooler would be much more difficult and time consuming. As well there is also the factor of the Southern Hemisphere being comprised more of water (lower heat index) than the Northern has. Which makes it generally cooler. Scientists are also finding that oceanic currents might have a hand in assisting the large amounts of ice that help keep things cooler.

One can't change the temperature of a cooler that has ice in it by adding more ice.

Have you ever slept in a snow cave? Its warmer in the snow then outside in the elements.
The outside elements is what creates the snow and ice.
Not vise versa.

175

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 06:43:52 PM »

pole noun [ C ] (PLACE)
​
"either of the two points at the most northern and most southern ends of the earth, around which the earth turns:"

If the earth is flat then there is a north pole but the south pole by definition would be the circle farthest from the north pole and that would be close enough to the ice wall for conversation purposes.
The north pole is a dot and the south pole is circumference.

176

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 06:38:38 PM »

Ice is ice. If my cooler had ten pounds of ice in it it would be just as cold as if it had 100 pounds of ice in it.

177

Flat Earth Theory / Sun temperatures

« on: February 19, 2018, 06:36:57 PM »

I had a thought that might prove that the sun is smaller and closer then science tells us.
Much smaller and much closer.
If what they claim is true about the sun and its location then why isn't it as hot when the sun comes up and sets then at high noon?

149.6 million km from earth to sun (science claim)
6,371 km is the size of earth (science claim)

6,371 km is 0.000004258689839572193% of 149.6 million km

The suns rays has to travel 0.000004258689839572193% farther from the closest side of earth to the farthest.
Cut that number in have because the sun can only illuminate half the earth at one time. (using their science)
0.00000212034%

So does the difference of 0.00000212034% contribute to the extreme summer and winter temperature differences we get living closer to the northern pole or south for that matter?

And why are mornings and evenings sun set and raise not the same temperature as high noon?
To me if the sun and earth are what science claims they are then in winter or summer or morning to evening as soon as the sun is seen the temperature should be the same for all parts of the day while still taking in account  thermal mass energy storage to build though out the day.

The season and daily temperature differences prove to me that the sun is much smaller and mush closer then science tells us.
Emphasis on the word "much."

Does this make sense?

178

Flat Earth Theory / Re: What is beyond the Ice Wall?

« on: February 19, 2018, 06:05:49 PM »

Logically?
More Ice is behind the ice wall.
The sun is the only thing preventing the earth from being an ice cube.
If the sun was as big and as far as science tells us then why is the south pole colder then the north pole?
The north pole gets the sun circling it from the inner circle (arctic circle) so the pole is surrounded but the sun and in the south it circles the outer circle (antarctic circle) leaving anything past it unaffected by the suns power.
No heat = ice