Well, now that programmers know that that there may be suspicious code in the software, they have a better idea of what to look for in the next review.
The point is that an entire world of programmers missed it in a very public open source security project used by millions of computers. Yet you are telling me that, simply because it it open source, that Joe Taylor's somewhat more obscure software project has probably been vetted so that all math is perfectly sound, the code is constructed to flow instantly without any subtle delays, and there are no hidden functions, all without the software reviewers, if it was even ever looked over, knowing what to look for.
Yes, because everyone who has ever worked for the government, including myself, is a member of the conspiracy,
If you were working for the Army accounting office and gave us a study proving that there was no corruption in Army finances, your work would absolutely be invalid.
Legitimate evidence comes from an outside source - external auditors, peer review by unconnected persons, etc. This should not be difficult to understand.