1
Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: God will prove the earth is flat on the Day of Resurrection
« on: June 13, 2018, 07:31:45 PM »So you concede that when the Bible mentions stars falling to earth, it's not talking about actual stars but rather meteors? Also, frankly I don't give two cents what the Quran says. I'm a Christian Jew who believes in the Bible. If you want to convince me by religious means, then use the Bible.I do not concede to that, when the Bible mentions stars falling to earth it means stars not meteors. I know you do not care about the Qur'an, which is why I refrained from using Qur'an verses as much as possible in my arguments except for this because you brought this new part up which the Qur'an directly mentions, whereas the Bible does not. And I am not trying to convince you, I'm only posting so that others can read and those who use reason will understand. And I'm sure that to you, the Qur'an sounds dumb saying that stars are thrown at devils and you'd probably say this is not a scientific book at all. Yet if I told this Qur'an verse to Muslims, they would try to put some spin on it so that it could fit science. You are doing the exact same thing they are, trying to spin the Bible to agree with science as Muslims try to spin the Qur'an to agree with science. But neither of these Books agree with science and they are not supposed to.
Where does it says that?The Qur'an says it and it's in my original post, I just did not reference it to the Qur'an.
20:105
And they ask you about the mountains, so say, "My Lord will blow them away with a blast.
20:106
And He will leave the earth a level plain;
20:107
You will not see therein any crookedness or any curve."
I did not said that the Bible never made mention of a physical structure in the sky. I said that the Bible never called that physical structure the firmament. Without going into detail, I believe there was a canopy surrounding the earth before Noah's flood that provided a protective barrier against the sun's harmful rays and pressurized the atmosphere. It all came down during the flood. But, back on point, The part about stretching out the heavens is in reference to God stretching out the universe and science has shown that the universe is expanding.Whether it is called firmament or not is not my point. There is a physical structure above the earth that's like a tent or a ceiling above the earth, which flat earthers typically call the dome. The term heavens seems to be a broad term that encompasses the sky above and this physical structure and there are 7 heavens, which is not directly mentioned in the Bible, only the Qur'an, but the Bible does refer to heavens in the plural and singular, and 2 Corinthians 12:2 mentions the 3rd heaven, so there are multiple heavens even according to the Bible. Science would not describe the universe as stretched or expanding like a tent or curtain.
As I said, I didn't said there wasn't a solid structure, I said the Bible didn't called that structure the firmament. And theoretically speaking, the canopy can work. However it's gone now and there's not much evidence to back up it's existence other than giant fossilized insects. and trapped air bubbles with 50% more oxygen.Where in the Bible does it say this structure is gone now? This is the structure that God rolls up on the Last Day, which is mentioned in the Torah, Gospel and the Qur'an.
I did not agree to anything. My point was if God was describing the earth as a flat disc he would've said "disc." Also if the earth is a disc then how can it have corners as flat earthers claim that verses talking about the four corners of the earth is evidence that the bible is saying the earth is flat. The answer to the circle thing is that the sphere is actually the most perfect example of a circle in a 3D universe. No matter how you look at it, it's a circle. With a disc, if I look at it from it's side it becomes a really skinny rectangle. With the four corners talked about in the Bible, it's referring to the four points of the compass.I do not know the shape of the earth as in square or circle or whatever, except that it is not a sphere and it is for all intents and purposes spread out flat as a carpet. If your point is that if the earth were a disc He would have said disc, then why do you not use that same reasoning and say if the earth were a sphere He would have said sphere? He did not say sphere.