Honestly, this looks pretty fake. Looks like a model being suspended over a moving background. We don't see it dock either, which is a bit suspicious.
Why is the fact you don't see it dock suspicious? You've just declared the whole thing a model (without evidence) so that would have been easy to fake.
Isn't it suspicious that it fades out just before the crucial moment? Perhaps not for you. It is for me.
Edited for Twitter. The whole thing is on YouTube
Did you mean to share this video? It's different to the original one we're discussing.
You had an issue with the original time lapse video not showing the docking. The video Tumeni just posted is the full approach and shows the docking as requested, non-time lapse, of the same mission. Jump to about 2:15:28 to see the docking event.
It's a completely different video... If you'd like to discuss the issues with this one, then that's fine. A new thread perhaps?
Also, I didn't 'request' a video of docking. I simply stated that it was suspicious that in the video we're discussing (which looks off to me) that on top of it looking like a model suspending over a moving background, the additional fact that we don't see the docking is suspicious. Bearing in mind that the point of the original video was that it was a single, uncut timelapse of a docking.
Your impression was incorrect of the original video. The original video was not intended as a single, uncut timelapse of a
docking. It is a time lapse titled, "Time-lapse of Dragon
on approach – two Dragons now docked to the @space_station" - A time lapse video of the 'approach',
not the docking, hence the title. Why it matters that you desire the 'docking' part, I don't know, when that is not what the video is and stated as such. The second 'different' video is of the same mission, just not a time lapse, and it shows the docking, which for some reason you seemed to want to see.
If everything still seems suspicious and fake to you, then I guess that's just what it seems to you. I'm not sure what there really is to discuss.