241

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: October 20, 2023, 03:43:21 PM »

You don't need to bother pretending she's on your side. Trump will no doubt be yelling about how he's never even heard of her and also that he never liked her to begin with, if he hasn't done so already.

Also, it's not polarizing to point out that a stance of "criticizing/insulting the military is morally wrong" should logically apply to everyone regardless of whether or not you like them.

Criticizing the military is not morally wrong at all.

Period.

End of sentence.

242

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: October 20, 2023, 12:54:03 PM »

...Either criticising them is bad or it isn't,...

^This doesn't sound polarizing at all...

On the contrary, it sounds extremely well thought out and reasoned...

Are you struggling with logical consistency?

Not at all.

It has been clearly demonstrated that vocalizing or writing polarizing positions is an extremely logical course of action and has absolutely no possible adverse consequences on any significant level.

I mean, Jesus H. Christ...

You wrote "Either criticizing them is bad or it isn't...", then closed the same fucking paragraph with the words, "Try some nuance."

Who the fuck are you trying to fool?

GTFO with your claims that I might be struggling with "logical consistency."

You have no fucking clue what that means.

You should just quit writing here on this forum in any topic.

243

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Trump

« on: October 20, 2023, 11:53:09 AM »

...Either criticising them is bad or it isn't,...

^This doesn't sound polarizing at all...

On the contrary, it sounds extremely well thought out and reasoned...

244

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: October 08, 2023, 10:38:14 AM »

Pfizer didn't even distribute the approved formulation...

245

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Died Suddenly

« on: October 07, 2023, 09:23:15 PM »

Hey, the vaccine works...[/sarcasm]

246

Flat Earth Media / Re: New line-of-sight sea level signal transmission record

« on: October 03, 2023, 11:28:27 AM »

lets call it 40,000 F-16 pilots worldwide; some aces, some not the sharpest knife in the kitchen drawer.

^Unbelievable this poster here on a flat earth forum has the gall to compare an actual pilot to a dull kitchen knife.

247

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: Coronavirus Vaccine and You

« on: October 03, 2023, 10:49:28 AM »

While I do that, please define lethal for me.  Just so we're on the same page.

You and I on the same page? Nice joke.

If something has 0.1% lethality it still means it can kill you. That's what lethality means if you didn't guess. Even 0.1% is pretty significant - I wouldn't want to take that chance, would you? COVID vaxx have up to 1% lethality according to the study (so I guess you did take that chance after all, and then some). And that says nothing about damages in the living.

Really? So... showering is lethal?  Peanuta are lethal?  Sugar is lethal?  God damn man... you must be one hell of a coward!

And yes, 1% is about right.  I mentioned this before.  In some people, the vaccine causes bloodclots to form after infection with covid resulting in a 1% death rate(roughly).
Also some are deathly allergic.

Without the vaccine, its 5%.

Where did you come up with a 5% death rate for Covid-19?

248

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 22, 2023, 11:47:15 AM »

Its the telescope that must be level at each observation point not the ground in between and of course close to the same elevation.

If you want to test a hypothesis, you need to remain true to the hypothesis. Arbitrarily throwing parts of it away will invalidate your results. I get that you'd really like to talk about something else, something that makes you more comfortable, but perhaps you could take that elsewhere, too?

The hypothesis is that if the earth was flat a leveled telescope sighted on a distant object would maintain that sight line as it moves further away.  But it does not, it points every further up making the object appear to sink.  Thus the earth is not flat.

Here we have an RE-adherent claiming it is possible for an object to be continuously observed over a flat, level surface at a distance of say...400 miles.

I have made no such claim.  The surface need not be continuously level as long as the telescope is leveled at each point of observation (not continuous observation).  Nor did I give any distance which of course would depend on the height of the target object as well as being limited by visibility conditions.

Of course you did. You wrote that the telescope would need to be leveled. If it is already leveled once and remains on the same level ground, affixed to that point, that's your claim.

You claim the object disappears because a telescope mounted as described eventually ends up somehow pointing up.

The telescope needs to be leveled AT EACH OBSERVATION POINT.  Level is perpendicular to the pull of gravity which makes it tangential to the surface.  Since the earth is round the angle of that tangent plane changes at each observation point resulting in the telescope pointing higher relative to the target as the distance between them increases.

Damn, you need to report this to the surveyors in Kansas...They got their stuff all wrong there...not.../sarcasm.

249

Philosophy, Religion & Society / Re: President Joe Biden

« on: September 22, 2023, 11:42:19 AM »

But tell me again how Biden is cognitively impaired and unfit to be President. 

\
Can't you visit your local pre-school and ask one of the students to inform you concerning the facts of this matter?

If you take Brandon along, you would be even more enlightened...amirite?

250

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 21, 2023, 02:55:37 PM »

Its the telescope that must be level at each observation point not the ground in between and of course close to the same elevation.

If you want to test a hypothesis, you need to remain true to the hypothesis. Arbitrarily throwing parts of it away will invalidate your results. I get that you'd really like to talk about something else, something that makes you more comfortable, but perhaps you could take that elsewhere, too?

The hypothesis is that if the earth was flat a leveled telescope sighted on a distant object would maintain that sight line as it moves further away.  But it does not, it points every further up making the object appear to sink.  Thus the earth is not flat.

Here we have an RE-adherent claiming it is possible for an object to be continuously observed over a flat, level surface at a distance of say...400 miles.

I have made no such claim.  The surface need not be continuously level as long as the telescope is leveled at each point of observation (not continuous observation).  Nor did I give any distance which of course would depend on the height of the target object as well as being limited by visibility conditions.

Of course you did. You wrote that the telescope would need to be leveled. If it is already leveled once and remains on the same level ground, affixed to that point, that's your claim.

You claim the object disappears because a telescope mounted as described eventually ends up somehow pointing up.

251

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 20, 2023, 11:48:28 AM »

Its the telescope that must be level at each observation point not the ground in between and of course close to the same elevation.

If you want to test a hypothesis, you need to remain true to the hypothesis. Arbitrarily throwing parts of it away will invalidate your results. I get that you'd really like to talk about something else, something that makes you more comfortable, but perhaps you could take that elsewhere, too?

The hypothesis is that if the earth was flat a leveled telescope sighted on a distant object would maintain that sight line as it moves further away.  But it does not, it points every further up making the object appear to sink.  Thus the earth is not flat.

Here we have an RE-adherent claiming it is possible for an object to be continuously observed over a flat, level surface at a distance of say...400 miles.

Where do these people come from!?!?

252

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 11, 2023, 03:45:03 PM »

Well, I certainly do not and will not do dirt for any "brother." And again, the moon landing was bullshit. And I guess, all the reporting did present a heliocentric viewpoint...

Good for you. There are good and bad Freemasons. Just like there are good and bad people. It's really not hard at all to understand.

But knowing what I know now about how certain groups operate, I wouldn't be surprised if they could force you to do dirt, if you have a family they can threaten.

Masons do not go around threatening peoples' families.

Think about your basic argumentation here:

1) Masons do dirt for each other, meaning they help each other; and,
B) Masons are gonna kill their brothers if they don't do the dirt.

Sorry, those things just don't line up. Lots and lots of dissonance in the tune your singing there....

253

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 11, 2023, 03:41:58 PM »

Proof?

Still struggling with basic terminology, I see.

254

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 11, 2023, 12:22:52 PM »

Freemasonry isn't behind any heliocentric worldview. Masons always meet on the level.

When you're part of a conspiracy, you know that you're selling BS to people.

It's not about Freemasonry as a whole. It never was and it never will be. I can count the Freemasons that "went to the Moon" with my fingers. But they were there... in the hangar faking it lol.

The "Moon landing," was definitely bullshit of course. But that has nothing to do with the shape of the earth.

Yes it does.

If you meant "prior knowledge of the shape of the Earth is not necessary to fake a Moon landing", then sure. They're just working from a model of the "Solar System" that someone knows is BS. But it doesn't really matter who it is. At the end of the day Freemasonry is just a network of people ready to do dirt for their "brothers". Plain and simple.

Well, I certainly do not and will not do dirt for any "brother." And again, the moon landing was bullshit. And I guess, all the reporting did present a heliocentric viewpoint...

255

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 11, 2023, 12:10:44 PM »

Freemasonry isn't behind any heliocentric worldview. Masons always meet on the level.

When you're part of a conspiracy, you know that you're selling BS to people.

It's not about Freemasonry as a whole. It never was and it never will be. I can count the Freemasons that "went to the Moon" with my fingers. But they were there... in the hangar faking it lol.

The "Moon landing," was definitely bullshit of course. But that has nothing to do with the shape of the earth.

256

Science & Alternative Science / Re: NASA’s Latest Moon Actors

« on: September 11, 2023, 10:17:39 AM »

Nah, I don't buy it. A conspiracy spanning centuries with no genuine motive in sight just isn't feasible to me, and I'd need more evidence than the fact that a number of these historical astronomers were members of a silly club to convince me otherwise.

What are you talking about? Are you saying that you think heliocentrism is just a coincidence and there is no organized conspiracy associated with it?

Freemasonry isn't behind any heliocentric worldview. Masons always meet on the level.

257

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: September 02, 2023, 08:25:33 PM »

Seems even more unlikely in a hurricane, which typically has alot of rain, making Energy Weapons based on heat largely useless.

Actually, once you catch metal on fire, water is effectively useless in combatting that type of fire. DEW's tend to vaporize other materials.

258

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: August 31, 2023, 07:08:04 PM »

melt one of four aluminim caps (not rims, caps)

The rims were melted, not caps.

259

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: August 31, 2023, 12:33:02 PM »

Speaking of which - how tf did this dog's hair not get burned??

Can you please explain, Mr. Dave??

While the dog hair is unusual, that is not evidence the dog died at that spot while the car was aflame.

260

Science & Alternative Science / Re: Nothing To See Here (Maui)

« on: August 31, 2023, 07:37:25 AM »

https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106717

US Government website