1

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moonlanding cam

« on: April 23, 2021, 08:33:12 AM »

If you go here, you'll find very food answers to a similar question: https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/17301/how-was-it-possible-for-the-apollo-11-to-film-and-take-pictures-with-such-radiat

In summary, it seems that between the short mission time, quick development time and specially treated film, they managed to keep the effects of radiation damage minor, though perhaps occasionally noticeable.

thanks, thats what i call i useful answer.

2

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moonlanding cam

« on: April 22, 2021, 02:21:32 PM »

And i noticed that the material is highly temperature sensitiv, and whats even more important: radiation sensitive.

And how did you notice this? Why do you accept this to be true? Why do you believe cosmic radiation is a real thing?

On the package it says: protect from heat and x-ray.

Just noticed a contradiction. Cosmic radiation does exist, just go up with a balloon and measure it. If it is cosmic, is a different question. But inside the logic of "we've been at the moon, and made some photos", theres a logical mistake. Just read first post again

Are X-rays a significant component of this cosmic radiation?

https://www.nasa.gov/analogs/nsrl/why-space-radiation-matters

https://fstoppers.com/film/tips-traveling-film-dont-be-naive-x-ray-scanning-kills-film-206051

3

Flat Earth Theory / Re: Moonlanding cam

« on: April 22, 2021, 08:25:59 AM »

And i noticed that the material is highly temperature sensitiv, and whats even more important: radiation sensitive.

And how did you notice this? Why do you accept this to be true? Why do you believe cosmic radiation is a real thing?

On the package it says: protect from heat and x-ray.

Just noticed a contradiction. Cosmic radiation does exist, just go up with a balloon and measure it. If it is cosmic, is a different question. But inside the logic of "we've been at the moon, and made some photos", theres a logical mistake. Just read first post again

4

Flat Earth Theory / Moonlanding cam

« on: April 21, 2021, 07:24:25 PM »

Hi!

Just created an account for that:

I found my dad's old minolta camera, with analog film. And i noticed that the material is highly temperature sensitiv, and whats even more important: radiation sensitive.

I coudn't find any details about the film on apollo missions, just that it was made thinner to get more pictures on a single roll (seriously? Doesn't that make it even more temp. sensitive?).

Everyone's talking about how special the cameras are increased durability blabla....

But there not a single chance to prevent cosmic radiation from passing through a camera, that is built to be as lightweight as possible. With a lot of lead maybe.
And a superfast heavy lead shutter.

Anyone here got a serious explanation?